Member Info for Kaeren

Next one out 0407

https://twitter.com/KaerenH/status/1674033957174738947?t=LbOYr3KbT6XpsaAvRLo3Bw&s=19

The existing board will have under the guidance of lawyers and barristers provided evidence , responses , without doubt Graham Mullis , Antony Dyer and Ajan , perhaps senior R&D staff who were in situ in the hospitals training and then signing off on end users will be those in court.

It will be those who negotiated the contract and what ensued who will take the stand. It is only those individuals who can say X Y and Z happened and we were told to produce x amt in advance ASAP or we we were told to produce x amt of Promate and the DHSC would take all we could produce , or all preliminary testing great , now purchase as many reagents as you can. We don't know , only those who liased directly prior to the contract and throughout it know all the facts.

The judge or DHSC barrister isn't going to say well James what do you think Graham said to Lord Bethnall. I'm sure you get my drift.

Scottish Offshore Wind Energy Council

One to watch .

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/rickygray_were-pleased-to-announce-that-our-first-activity-7079448303364378624-Opje?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_android

Ah , missed that, sorry Lse03. Would have posted in correct thread !

Agree Dawski, as I posted late the other night I think they have achieved an incredible amt in a very short time.

Was just reading this , focusing on the man hours involved and the incredible cost. My thoughts immediately went to something JW said about Navantia after winning the FSS contract. It was something akin to we are thrilled to be working with Navantia which will ensure we stay on budget and deliver on time. It is a huge step up for Harl and reassuring to know that JW openly acknowledges how vital the partnership with Nav is.

https://www.naval-technology.com/news/cost-royal-navy-frigate-iron-duke-refit-revealed/

It is not my responsibility to reprimand TDF.

Incase you hadn't noticed I am oft the butt of his jokes , water off a ducks back to me. You bait him to post. If I was remotely so inclined , I am more then capable of ramping the share.

You however act as thought you are Dr Faust , promised heaven and were delivered into hell by the evil Mephistopheles( JW) For goodness sake get a grip , you aren't invested , you sold out years ago but constantly bring up things that are irrelevant to the future of the company. You claim to have a yacht , to be retired , perhaps enjoy it.

I think perhaps Broomtree that he is using the exact phraseology that Hebridian used to GGGG21 earlier today. Yes very condescending but in this instance it is called serving back what's given in exact measure.

Have to say Hebridian was so far off the mark with that statement that it confirmed to me that he is prepared to write/ posts any old drivel to further his cause.

Yes Roly , ive read it in the past when I was looking to see what Treks thoughts were on a share I was exploring.

15.13 " We post on it but none of us are invested in it"

🙂

Sounds an awful lot like the Harl board today , main difference being I don't think the motive here is to help each other out.

Yes Hebridian , right now the bottom line doesn't look pretty.

That is to be expected with what the company have achieved thus far.

It actually has the potential to be a fantastic UK success story.

To bring four yards from the brink of extinction and within three years to be dining at the same table as the' big boys' and beating them to win the 1.6 billion FSS contract is a remarkable feat. Throw covid in the mix , which decimated dry docking bookings , ship repairs and availabity to source required components and their success to date is even more remarkable. I'm invested because I believe this company can achieve further big contracts and their yards are ideally placed to benefit hugely from the incoming renewables boom. A primary reason Navantia wasted no time in signing a MOU with Harl, to benefit also.

The debt won't be an issue within a few years and proof of a strong forward book and a few further big contracts will work wonders for sentiment , a hugely important factor when investing on aim.

I agree JW should not quote dates without absolute certainty that they are achievable. In this instance his dependency on a third party is the root issue. We know the guarentee scheme approval gives him some flexibility on negotiating more preferable rates. I have no doubt that they are inundated with requests and being a new dept they are finding their feet. Who knows , not you or I , they could be saying processing complete imminently and then failing to deliver. Jw is hardly going to announce that to the market.

Don't know why you bother, if I could swan about on my yacht I most certainly would be doing that and not posting on here to Dog.

I think Dog that you are 100 % misunderstanding what Gg is saying.

He is not saying anything remotely negative about Harl.

Press the pause button.

I did indeed mean barges Broomtree.

Thx for correcting.

It's a very nice picture , l hope the end product is on budget , on time and generates multiple more orders. In the interim ... anyone for a game of find the missing tugs. Only 21 to find ,rumour has it that they are fairly large.

You asked me a question about fake news Dawski.

Lse03 carried a twitter post to the board re supposed work H&W were to carry out on RAF Argus. I responded that would be huge news. I then went onto twitter and responded to the original poster writing ..

Not heard this news before now , if your source is accurate then it is excellent news . Shall await further confirmation. Thanks for the info.

Xenor questioned the source.

I wrote on here poster not known to me , could be 100 % accurate or pure fabrication.

Personally didn't post it on twitter nor did i post it on linked in.

What spurious linked in post are you referring to , I must have missed it , I didn't see one. At best the Harland and Wolffs post was ambiguous re vwhy the ship was in the yard .

I was suprised by the RNS , what Harl have done is announce the numbers Friday and then will do so again , with the interest rate rise occurring on Friday too , I'd have pulled the RNS. Hope when we are in profit JW decides to inform the market at least twice by RNS. I appreciate speculation has been quashed but that was going to happen next week anyway. Now hoping he gives sufficient detail of the cash the company is in receipt of to allay the cry of placing required.

What I know confirmed is the 25mm FSS , 16mm Sapien, unknown number for RNLI platform , unknown number for 4 space frames and four ground anchor frames and no idea of value of all the ships we have seen primarily in Belfast. Additionally no idea of staged pyt for M55 or if we have hit required number to reach a staged pyt on Cory barges , or how close to that we are. Right now until planning app is signed off there must be a limitation on how far H& W can progress works.

One would hope that more details emerge this week now the known bad news is out the way.

According to all that JW has said thus far I am expecting news on some large contracts to be forthcoming soon. I too am impressed by the build out of senior hires LSE03 and without doubt they will have had exposure to the potential forward book , without that I doubt many would have joined. News rich period incoming imo , in the interim traders will trade ( no issue with that ) and those shorting will discuss in detail all the companies previous failures and highlight only the risks going forward

A normal Aim board.

The reappearance of some is no coincidence , who gives two hoots who is new v old , strikes me some of the old posters are the most manipulative and appear to suit their own agenda.

Great to see progress , bau for Harl.

Tech transfer will be brilliant for the company.

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/colette-duffy_fss-harlandandwolff-navantia-activity-7077956571627937792-siRj?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_android

I was perfectly fine with you Stokey12 until you relentless commented on everything I posted. It is interesting to note that you have no issue with what other posters say to you . I am very balanced and far from disruptive but you can't leave it alone . Regards 'her'

I'm not suggesting delays , I was seeking clarification on the rules.

Companies are allowed to delay if they meet certain criteria ( long list ) and that is for a period of three months. Rather it out the way ASAP and then onwards and upwards. So hopefully within in a week a trading update .

It's six months just looked it up..