RE: What I was trying to post21 Apr 2024 19:37
CS , you posted 20/4 13.25...
'It was just the change in wording that was not only a surprise but very welcome.'
It was what they wrote in relation to the application for summary judgement, that took us all by suprise. It was strongly worded and they are confident it will be dismissed.
Now as the burden of proof lies with the DHSC , Novacyt must be feeling very confident to issue that statement.
I expected to see share price volatility until approx a week before the trial commenced.
My question, to which I don't know the answer is..
Do we collectively feel that the DHSC are using this as a test case to determine whether to go to full trial , if it was a minor point, why bother, is it tactical because Ncyt have to respond and therefore they will know before full trial how Novacyt intends to contest the issue in question ?
Furthermore does anyone view this as a critical turning point and potentially think any ruling will be indicative of final outcome or alternatively negotiations to settle to begin in earnest. Whilst I fully appreciate that non of us are aware what the application concerns , there must be a motive behind proceeding in such a fashion.