Member Info for JG68

Don't listen him, he's a horrible troll shorter that floats from board to board. Aka lodgeview

I don't know why people aren't wondering about Azvalors huge stake?
Between their 2 funds ( international and mutual) they hold 25% of the company.
You would have thought that they must have some influence behind the scenes, and can't be happy where current SP sits.

So according to Advfn 8 million shares bought and 400k sold.

Bet this is now the new trading range 116-118

JPMorgan are also short here, 0.6 %,
I'm sure shorts are still trying to control this one, be interesting to see if they all close out now, scumbags

What is the conditional offer though?
How are they pricing this now? Guesswork!!

Was in the papers a few months ago, no RNS, I mentioned it on here

Be interesting when US opens

Was mooted at 500 earlier in the year, surely a figure has been discussed , what's the offer

A whole string of chunky sells by the looks of it

A new one disclosed yesterday , lucky gits

Need an activist investor or an interested party.

Me too LG, it rose on results, tanked because of Liberium and stayed there.
The only possible reason I can think of is the debt, but other companies have plenty of debt too.
It always seems to trade in such a tight range, even earlier when the spike was blatant on all of mine , except this and b----y PFC.
One day Rodney.

Dow and ftse up NEX down
Dow and ftse down Nex down.
Inflation down Nex down, inflation up Nex tanks.
Oil up Nex down, oil down Nex down.

Such a weird share, everything spikes on US cpi data, except this.

I have taken some parts of Tareqs statement today and note a very Conservative and cautionary tone in the statements below, it feels like he has given worst case scenario.
The bond price remains unmoved, today is not all doom and gloom.

"a cautious view of the quantum and timing of recognition of certain revenue claims that would have partly offset those costs."





Approximately 50% of these additional costs are expected to be paid over the remainder of 2023, with the balance spread over 2024 and 2025. "Any future recoveries from clients would mitigate this outflow."



"A significant proportion of the resulting costs are expected to be recovered "but discussions have not yet reached a sufficient level of maturity to recognise this incremental revenue.



The figures announced today also include an "allowance for adverse settlements as part of our efforts to accelerate the release of working capital balances."

Pokerchips
Do you think it's telling that this RNS has hardly affected the bond price?

Why would they kitchen sink it today only to sucker punch with a RI in 2 weeks ?
Doesn't make sense really.

KG
I'm overweight here too, tranches in my ISA, Sipp and trading account.
It's the way it appears that individuals have the ability to alter a companies value by bypassing the basics rules of supply and demand that really irritates me.
I'm happy with my investments here and I don't lose sleep over them, but it annoys the s--t out of me that a price can be moved so much for example to fill an order. These people should pay the price like the rest of us.

LG doesn't it feel like that a human individual us sitting in front of a screen with a green up tick and a red down tick that they are able to click at will ?

Doesn't it feel like individuals move the price accordingly to help an II buy or sell?

Would this sort of practice occurred b4 the internet, and I'm only talking 25 years ago?

What's happened to the basic valuation principles of supply and demand?

And as for PFC I'm still very cautious about them, again too many shorts, downward movement on blue days, the jury still out on that one.