Member Info for Jerryspaniel

Not an exchange requirement but it makes a lot of sense to have a ‘grown up’ share price, and a lot fewer shares.

Spud the minimum is 20c

Depends how much you think is there.

Leslieby. Correct he did. He referenced one of his directors. I think that is Alex Borelli, the ex chairman. I think he is wrong except for stamp tax on purchases. This has been discussed before but there are some stocks on AIM that benefit from Business Property Relief on IHT. I have investigated this before and I am virtually certain that GGP does NOT qualify.

I just wish GGP would take some professional advice on this and publish it. Its company specific not investor specific, so I think it falls at their door.

BBloke, I am pretty sure that Shaun has said that Havieron is a 20m oz endowment, which doesnt mean that will all be produced (though at these prices that must be a possibility).

My guess has for some time been that Hav is 20-30m ozs resource and Telfer is at least 10-15m ozs. But I doubt whether the former will be delineated while I own shares. The latter might be.....

Bunky, I am with you 100% on dividends. However in Australia they get a tax credit called a franking credit which 'encourages' the payment of dividends. Perhaps Shaun might consider paying a stock dividend as an alternative (for people like you and me), as they do in France. The added benefit in France is that the stock option is always at a nice discount!

Johnycash, if you are having to ask that question at this late stage, I think I can guarantee it wont make the slightest difference if you vote or not.

Sageman, that absolutely wont happen. Firstly because a company needs approval to buy its own shares back and secondly cos what you suggest is trading shares in its own name, which I am pretty sure is illegal.

Spy, I would say that it is relevant and its interesting. Macro is important to GGP as that drives our sales revenue.

As to be the journalist, well it would be wonderful if any journalist could be bothered, or was intelligent enough to do any of this analysis. Sadly they just trot out the same old arguments of the Keynesian school - assuming they know what that is....

Absolutely MH01, these are bad results for NS and arent a fair comparison to any other miner including GGP. The market will be focussed on whether this is a blip or a sign of a bigger issue and how NS explain its the former.

It makes GGP look even better but I wouldnt read too much into it from a GGP pov.

Morning All. It’s all opinions really. My opinion is that Liam’s interviews have got immeasurably better over the years. He is allowed an opinion too, but it shouldn’t be thought of as more important than anyone else’s. He knows more than some about Ggp, but less than others. There are many others on here whose opinion I would value much higher, so it needs to be put into context.

In this instance I think his opinion is quite different to mine. He isn’t wrong to have that opinion just that I don’t see it like he does.

The way he has gone about is a bit odd but that’s his choice.

The fact that Shaun has stuck with Liam suggests he sees value in this form of communication though that will diminish as we hopefully become dominated by institutional ownership.

Storm in a teacup imo.

Amplenomore. Very funny. Often feel like writing that myself. Instead I put 10 more in the bin today.

I am afraid MisterMike you are about to cop it, but I fear that you are just symptomatic of many on here.

You have held the shares since 2019 but you dont know much about the company do you? Are there many shares you hold where you havent a clue whats going on?

You dont read the company statements.

You dont read whats on their website.

You dont listen and watch interviews with the CEO/MD.

You dont engage with fellow shareholders.

You dont understand the difference between a dual listing and a cross listing.

You dont understand how a cross listing works and that the shares are fungible on Computershare.

You dont understand why the ASX is a resource heavy index and the nature of the Aussie super funds investment mandates.

And yet you own a volatile Australian gold mining share listed on AIM.

Buy some premium bonds....They do it all for you.

In amongst a load of absolute tripe from some new investors there is a good explanation from Bluetiger, multiplier and Speedy and more sense from Element.

The pain is I have to wade through so much garbage every morning. Would rather not filter new people until I know they add nothing but it looks like I will be adding to my 150 in the bin.

12p, 15p does it really matter in the long run? You either get it or you dont.

Brilliant video from Peter. It encapsulates my thoughts entirely.

If you dont think he is right maybe you could point to where he is wrong?

I am somewhat saddened but not surprised that some(most) on here want to post about whether the sp is 16p or 15.95p when the RNS today was so significant. The company has reduced the dilutive effects of options by 500m shares. The company will be compliant with the UK code and the ASX, so as to allow even more institutions to buy their shares.

This is entirely due to the fact that in Mark Barnaba and Shaun Day we have two class operators who can see the big picture. They can now truly state that they are aligned with long term shareholders.

I look forward to Mark rewarding Shaun with a new long term incentive plan, and for Shaun to do likewise with senior management.

This news is somewhat irrelevant to those who are looking at a quick penny trade, but its brilliant news for those of us who can see the future.

I am sure something like this has happened before though I have never seen it. I wonder how many on here would agree to do the same?

It’s clearly best practice and perfectly aligns directors with shareholders and the fully diluted shares in issue reduces massively.

My opinion of the board keeps improving and they were always very good.

I think Shaun and the management do need some more options now. It’s not like they don’t deserve it.

Maguire has been talking about July 1st, Basel 3 for months.

Sellme, last week I assumed that the US actually did have all 8130 tons of gold. I wondered what gold needed to get to equal the reported federal debt. $128,000 I think was the answer. Very nutty indeed.

Martin, it was just an example. It works for any number between 0.0001% and 100%. You pick the dividend you want.