RE: Bluejay v ALBA1 Oct 2020 10:25
Bluejay also have other assets, some in Greenland and also in Finland. It's probably better to try and get a handle on the value of undeveloped JORCd assets as we are likely to sell them on rather than mine them ourselves. I'd expect the iron ore to be no more than a couple of $/tonne but of course if you have tens of millions of tonnes, it quickly adds up. Same with ilmenite, but I don't have much of a clue how much it's worth in situ. I think it's probably double the iron ore but that's only a guess, but again once you multiply that by millions of tonnes the numbers start to look very appealing.
With gold, completely undeveloped in situ ozs can range anywhere from under $10 (warzone in DRC) to $200+ (good grades, near surface in stable mining friendly jurisdiction) I'd argue that we should exceed the top of that range as we have a workable mine for some of the resource and an end product which commands a market premium, though a negative is being situated within a national park. Imagine one day getting planning permission for 500kozs at in situ sale value of say $300/oz? For the mathematically challenged, that's 2p a share as a straight up sale, and obviously more profit if we chose to mine it ourselves or in a JV. Then add in Greenland...