Member Info for Jambo813

Thanks Funky.
I guess this goes 2 ways then, potential buyer has already negotiated a price based partly on DFS results or they and others await result then negotiate

So does the sale itself or just the sale price (obviously) depend on the DFS. Original question was not answered by the way “ most accurate assessment “ of what ? May be in the ground or actually in the ground . Which is it was the question and no one can answer it seems,

Reason was trying to get my head around the fact you had an aunt in her 80s three decades ago when you met your other half. Said aunt presumably in same age bracket as your parents and presumably they themselves in same age bracket as parents of your good lady. That is why It made sense to me both your in laws must be well over their hundred years. Take care

So how old are the in laws TMT

TMT you have shared so much information, almost. If you want advice what to do with your “2.5 m quid’ ‘ share it with the children and grandchildren

TMT sorry but I have to ask this question, how old is your father and mother in law ?

GGP are well on the way to confirming a Tier 1 mine that MRE was only the start . They will be upgrading the numbers over every qtr up to production. Well done even if the impatient cannot see it.

I agree but the market will discount the here and now value as it will a) act on sentiment of the negatives amongst us and b) timeline to future up dates and production .
If anyone is thinking of selling, tomorrow is not the time.
Patience with HAV as always will pay off, with or without SW

Talking of the decline, in the MRE report NM do talk about in the future making a “subject to a positive decision to mine”
It does not say when they will make that decision so is it possible it can be after they complete the decline ?

Read the NM MRIE report I am sure they used $1400 after costs and even have an exchange rate. Have a copper price as well.

And if the trade is MM to MM it is the selling MM that reports the trade.

There are other big players other than the MMs who can participate in the auctions (they pay for the privilege) so it is usual to see the larger trades taking place outside normal hours.

Increasing a short per the 8.3 notice, I take it that is a hedge

Hate to have to advise a professor on such basics, if you need to keep abreast of the NN director meetings you should google their website Prof

DGR , I guess arguably ( not that I want to) for an explorer if you have the equipment to do your own tests then over time you get your money back as it must cost to get the independent tests done. Explorers only hit the jackpot on rare occasions ( GGP hopefully the rare exception) and thats when would make sense to get the verification when explorers own tests look good. Just saying

Joe, may as well drop it . Tig, Spy, Merc and even the respected Hydro have posted about mates having info etc.
Never believe it and they are correct if a clown is buying in on the bull that is spouted. It is a shame as they do make contributions but must feel a bit insecure to pump every now and then usually contradicting what they have posted in the past. No need for it.

Please no pirates on board here. Enough of them on EUA lol

We are expecting an exploration update of sorts later this month, how important is this to the overall sale.
Regarding the sale, and the above results, is it really feasible any buyer will want the whole company, assuming there is one asset they do not want then EUA will still exist but with X amount of cash in bank. Assuming EUA continues to remain then it will be a special dividend distribution to shareholders. Anyone think this is a possibility?

I have been the antithesis from the start to Mickeys exuberance ( despite thinking for some reason he is getting it right) so will show a little joy.
It’s been not a bad day.

Waiting to exactly the same JS1990