Member Info for Ivyspivey

Of course FDA decision is a major milestone.
Worth much much more with Approval and yes would certainly take a hit with a negative decision.
But I estimate COS of 95%+
No AcComm request as far as I know so looks good to me

When I searched on the link this was the only thing that came up but obviously from an age ago
LONDON, Oct 8 (Reuters) - Scancell Holdings PLC :

* Hlds - notice of results and share price movement

* Not aware of any reason that would lead to recent movement in its share price

((London Equities Newsroom; +44 20 7542 7717))

((For more news, please click here ))

That would be my take on the matter ie they are not going to commercialise ialise themselves

Agree LL and others about tweet.
It is a tweet simple as so please just await for official news or a much more evidence based assumption.
My worry would be that if the Nomad or FRR have to issue a RNS based on media speculation to clarify the situation then it may not be the news some people want so leaves an avenue for shorters and probably discourages FRR from issuing more tweets if it is being misinterpreted.

Hi BOB007.
AB Company’s may be a bit unloved ATM but all about the deal for US Commercialisation imo.
If MTFB was focused on commercialising themselves then it could take longer than planned but if it is with an already revenue generating Company in the hospital space which is what I expect then I am not so worried.
Also the doe icicles target market for Iclaprim rather than drug if last resort Inthink will play well.
Plus fully expect further supportive measures by US give to help encourage new ABs and this may be by guaranteed prices etc so maybe today’s elections may help US Healthcare we simply have to wait and see

http://cbw.ge/economy/italy-pm-backs-tap-pipeline-italy-to-get-natural-gas-via-georgia/

http://cbw.ge/business/sprc-on-the-global-petrochemical-map/

Inan
Like RR I am not at all worried whether you have any qualifications or experience or not.You stated my science understanding as poor.I simply responded and asked you the same question which you did not answer.
Just admit the truth rather than waffling on.
Please do not twist my words on the need for SCLP to improve its digital communication.I think most people accept that and it is not a criticism of the BOD.
You make mountains out of molehills and have total lack of any perspective.
I am certainly not claiming to be an expert and but equally you want everyone to bow down to you out of some superiority complex.
Well that is what I respond to and if you attack me I will certainly come back at you,
The one significant difference is I only respond to you as I certainly don’t consider myself inferior to you in any way but
never feel the need to argue with anyone else.
In contrast to you who wants to argue with anyone who takes an alternative view.
That tells me you are very uncomfortable with your self image whilst the rest of the posters on here( myself included) are comfortable with our views and how we communicate them.
Anyway work to do

No I As responding directly to your question.
I repeat what are your specific scientific knowledge and qualifications??
Failures to respond are what people do who have something to hide.

RR.
Funny I Failed O Level Physics and Art which were last exams I Failed.
Yes would hope working for pharma so long and speaking to Drs and Experts on a daily basis then I would have been found out long ago if I could not take the Technical messages on board from the Scientists but yes commercial side is main focus.
PS have also done fair bit of Management Consultancy in other industry’s as well as being Joint Managing Partner in Feveloping Industrial Sites.One of reasons why I chose to not to climb the greasy pole which sure many understand

Inanaco.Sounds like you are waffling.
You questioned my science background.I stated some of it.
What are your specific Science qualifications?
What is your specific Science experience or expertise?
Once again failure to disclose actual objective information I will take as a blatant attempt to hide.
I am afraid being a self taught bulletin board poster does not qualify
If I go and seek advice from any professional I need to know they have reached a minimum standard and not just self ttaught

Yes I am a salesman now which is something I choose to do.
Have also held Senior Sales/Marketing/business Development Roles with Eli Lilly/Merck and Danifi and currently work for another drug Company.
I have post grad qualifications in Business Administration and worked as Marketing Consultant specifically developing Non digital and Digital Ways of Communication/Engagement.
Yes my scientific qualifications are poor only an O level in Chemistry but hsbpbing eirjedbinmoharma for over 30 years I have br8ng able to communicate with the scientific community without any issues.
Do what is your great science background.Please explain .
I do look forward to the answer and would take great delight if my Chemistry o level trumps any formal qualifications you have.
I will take any refusal to list your specific science background qualifications as a clear acknowledgement of your lack of science expertise and as I say Inptefer to maintain the habits of a lifetime and take notice if real scientists not unproven bulletin board posters.

Petch as you have produced a reasonable response
Back in Feb they did try to find a suitable CFO who could manage both phases of being a non revenue and revenue producing Company but these candidates are highly sought after and suitably employed and as JG did a very good job as interim and was prepared to stay on until a suitable replacement was found then why rush to appoint someone when you can wait until the most optimal time which is fast approaches ng.
I am not prepared to say only more on this specific matter and of course it is only material when a BOD member leaves or is appointed not when the recruitment process us still ongoing.
So yes they may have changed plans which I would expect with any Company trying to secure the best pathway mi big forward.
GL is consistent in that they plan,have options and make decisions as a BOD in the light of the latest available insight and information.
That way you tend to get good decisions andvtgeyveitk to their own timetable and not that if individual SH

Inanaco
Don’t expect you to understand as your primary focus is on minutiae of the science whereas I am much more focused on the strategic and commercial progess of the platforms.
I don’t know your background and “ expertise” but no matter to me as plenty of great scientists employed by SCLP that I can readily listen to.
My background is in pharma sales and marketing and strategic business development so may have some insight into these matters.
Whether people listen or not to is up to them.
Your crass comment on twitter demonstrates your failure to understand the importance of content marketing and the role of the likes of SCLP in working with these types of groups.
Because you do not understand it you pretend it is not relevant well we are now in a digital age which if you do not embrace it will bypass us.

Inanaco
Don’t expect you to understand as your primary focus is on minutiae of the science whereas I am much more focused on the strategic and commercial progess of the platforms.
I don’t know your background and “ expertise” but no matter to me as plenty of great scientists employed by SCLP that I can readily listen to.
My background is in pharma sales and marketing and strategic business development so may have some insight into these matters.
Whether people listen or not to is up to them.
Your crass comment on twitter demonstrates your failure to understand the importance of content marketing and the role of the likes of SCLP in working with these types of groups.
Because you do not understand it you pretend it is not relevant well we are now in a digital age which if you do not embrace it will bypass us.

Yes get the trials finished.
It is more than just a resource issue it is a way of thinking strategically from a non scientific viewpoint which is equally important in driving SCLP forward.
Not just about the amount of time Sally may spend on the website it is the distraction from her other work.
Either outsource or give it to a PhD student if they were so worried about the cost.
But it is a greater reflection on the attributes of the BOD who fail to realise the importance of thus way of communicating.
Think back to the importance of Patient advocacy groups in the US you need to communicate properly with them and that needs a good digital presence including website

It is my money I am risking so can where whatever coloured glasses I want but am sufficiently interested to take up every opportunity o talk to those that are much better informed than me and certainly you.
You do seem to have a very personal interest in the position of CFO.Dud you apply and maybe got turned down.
I dont really know or care as having an interim CFO doing a good job is better than having a full time one doing a bad job.
As said before if you don’t understand the different requirements of a CFO in being in a pre revenue as opposed to a revenue generating Company then suggest you do a lot more research before you invest here.
I am totally comfortable with current situation and met JG at AGM so no issues for me so why are you inventing non issues.
As for any other Company and the CFO becoming the CEO and then failing the Company then that is irrelevant unless you of course know nothing about MTFB and are just negative on all of AIM.
Anyway last comment from me as I only invest where I am comfortable until something concrete changes and certainly do not pay attention to a bulletin board poster with no genuine history who is clearly fixated on a specific agenda

Did not realise that.
Sally is a great asset but should be spending her time fully focused on science.The point was made at AGM by CH on several occasions about SCLP having limited resources.
So they need imo to think like a much bigger Company and outsource those functions who have the resources and expertise to do it better like digital communication etc.

HT,
Maybe they are just going about their business quietly and efficiently like they have for the last few years.
If I thought they were hiding bad news I would have considerably reduced my exposure here.
Most news points are predictable events like data readout etc and we have successfully passed those so the risk has got progressively less.
Really can’t think of any bad news to come out until PDUFA date and I think that has a 95% plus chance of being great news.

Hi Boom,
You will be aware the website point was made at the AGM and agree they need to improve their whole digital communication platform.