Member Info for inanaco

Scancell does not produce Check point inhibitors .. ? so why is it damming for scancell ?

Ruckrover i don't claim i could do a better job ...

""""" And if you can't see that in some areas, on occasion, SCLP have been naïve then you are, well, naïve! """""

what occasion ? be specific .. otherwise its filibuster

You are not in the real world chap ... if you are using that article ..

"""" A broad range of regimen-specific toxic effects caused fatalities in 0.3% to 1.3% of treated patients;"""

when the other 99% will die if not treated ..

In the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) trials for lung cancer, 29 of 1176 patients (2.5%) were reported to have died from toxicity of the treatments. Several papers have reported the risk factors of early death after chemotherapy or treatment-related death caused by chemotherapy in patients with cancer.

what a load of codswallop ..........

""""""" Sadly, biotech companies issue timeframes through naivety """""""""

scientists as per scancells patents create "Discovery" this discovery is then translated into a product suitable for the clinic, SCIB1 ... further research gave us Moditope ... an other discovery ...which gave us Homocitruline another discovery ... other developments by other scientists gave us TCR ...

all this has to be taken through exhaustive testing .... with variable timelines as you are still in discovery as its not been done before on this particular product ... so Modi1 went from a great vaccine to a superb vaccine when they added Amplivant ...

and yet Leas comes on here and calls that Naivty ...

I appreciate you want to indulge yourself like Ruckrover .. but really you are not in the same League as the Scancell Scientists

You talk the share down before its even gone up ...........

Your words

""""""" I, like C7, would hope for a rise in the run up to the AGM, but history tells us it falls after."""""""""""

then stop moaning .........

if you consider all the news we have had do not constitute inflection points in value , and the market has not accepted them as inflection points, what can you do about it ...

Moan .. LOL

The issue for Scancell is not that it has weak science, because the science has been validated by many third parties, the issue really is the short term thinking of the stock market, expecting an on going daily dose of news like a comfort blanket, mainly because the hard work required to gain an in depth understanding of how scancell fits into the market and how the science is interpreted is very difficult to get your head around because its very diverse as well with 3 Platforms, or possibly 4 depending if you consider another PTM within the moditope patent another platform.

so the question is why does the market not respect the existing inflection points that have already passed.

I have no answer to that ... its just the way the UK investment sector works, In the US the presumption is success

In the UK the presumption is failure ..

indeed RuckRovers attitude clearly is tuned to this way of thinking ...

be happy that you are miserable .. don't break the habit, it's what make you such a great poster adored by all

Hiding ? Scancell is a side show at the moment, until we get to the AGM , 3.30 in parliament is of more interest, however reading your post warranted a response .. as your optimistic happy post made me smile ..

I see you woke up happy again Ruck ...

Take stock , its fully listed in the Funding round RNS exactly what the investment is for. Its not about priority as everything that scancell has planned for is funded and in the process of

so what question would you ask that multiple RNS have not already answered

scancell has already stated the position ...

"" SCIB1 has demonstrated impressive survival data to date, and operational and regulatory activities are underway for the initiation of the international SCIB1 checkpoint inhibitor combination Phase 2 study in patients with melanoma."

what more can they say ?

Tf they have just given you the time tables

If you are jacob R. M fan why back chequers ?

exactly what do you agree on with Konar/ruckrover post ? and why

this is exactly how i think ...

5 videos one after the other

https://youtu.be/MPhYmGv3wWs?list=PLRXacD0bo1ZZ-J2TOZA8JZlk_1Rs-YUyf

and any questions that fall under "insider trading" are deflected

which includes Deals, funding, governance

when all the funding is directed at the "Science and the development of the science"

asking a question to get no answer is not really sensible is it Ruck ...

so what questions would you ask if in attendance indeed that could also be asked of Konar

because actually brexit is way more important at the moment than any forward looking plan .. and i will explain why.
at the last election scancell rushed through a cash raise because of the election stated quite openly by Richard
why have they now added a uk trial arm before we leave the EU ?

many things apply to scancell directly in how we leave

yet you fixate on nothing ... ?

i have no interest in debating a time table that has not changed .. its not Northern Rail ..

So C7 you seem to have also assumed that the trial dates will not start on time as set out in the end of year forward statements ?

or are you just agreeing with everybody as a sign of solidarity ...

another point Konar

my post contained this

Why would you consider the BOD will change course in less than 4 weeks between notices. ?

which in effect throws your suggestion into question ...

posting part of my post is not playing the game fair ..

I agree Wild ... the event will consist of Questions about funding and moaning about delays .. this will take up all the Q&A section

rather than digging into the science of Glycans and Homocitrulline

lets hope that something curtails the remoaners before AGM ...