Member Info for inanaco

all the agm statements have to be read out and voted on first ..by law then its lindy time ...

set procedure Crumbs .. again by law ...

Tf that was not the issue ....... Evans did not do well i accepted that in 2015 ... the questions that he had to deflect should not have been asked.

And they would not have been asked by professional investors

only by Amateurs

you see the sequence normally is animal testing

leading to Human ...

or is the Mod1 mouse modal data giving such significance to the TCR data that its just not required ?

because that means Modi1 clinical development has be accepted and peer reviewed by BioNtech ...

Ruckrover ... you keep asking me what questions i would ask ? why ? you have already stated you are way smarter than me... why don't you lead it out ? Get yourself to the AGM .. you can talk 1 to 1 with Lindy ... on the adjuvant requirements of nanovesicle .. etc etc etc ...

try this ... lindy have Biontech tested the moditope TCR in the mouse yet ? the whole process ? blood extraction exposure, tcr extraction ... then another animals t cell modified with new TCR, expanded and re infused ..

because they have only mentioned Humans ..

point i am making is time Ruck ... why waste 10mins of the Q and A on questions that cannot be answered, so that Ivy can monitor Body language ? wtf

so basically you want me to ask questions on the science at the AGM while being drowned out by idiots .... which you agree with

now you ask me to answer questions on the science while i am being drowned out by idiots ....... ? logic ..

None

i am a buyer of scancell ....... and the crazy part so is Ivy ...

the point i made which was i would not attend the AGM because folks will mess up the Q and A has proven correct
Ivy is going to ask questions of a nature that scancell is forced to

"hide behind protocols "

i guess you have just not understood the thread

problem is Crumbs, Evans was out of his depth, did not have the political side stepping skills of Teresa may to block the questions that are price sensitive ...

Ivy is coming across as if that should all be repeated again .. which now happens at every AGM .. cash call blah blah blah

"hiding behind Protocols "

unfortunately because you support this statement Tf .. i have no interest in answering any of your questions on the science as the BB is clogged up with posts that really you should be standing up against ..

..
"""""If they make the mistake again imo of retreating into their shell and putting up barriers and refusing to answer genuine questions or hiding behind protocols and/or bad body language as they did to a large extent in 2015 then I fear the reaction will not be good."""""

That was not a MISTAKE in 2015 ... thats was folks asking questions that are commercially sensitive

Typical ... So Boom and Tf both subscribe to the disruption of the AGM by shareholders asking questions that cannot by law be answered ...

Nice one ..

Do You support
that statement .......... by Ivy simple Yes or No answer will do

"""""If they make the mistake again imo of retreating into their shell and putting up barriers and refusing to answer genuine questions or hiding behind protocols and/or bad body language as they did to a large extent in 2015 then I fear the reaction will not be good."""""

Do You support that statement .......... by Ivy simple Yes or No answer will do

"""""If they make the mistake again imo of retreating into their shell and putting up barriers and refusing to answer genuine questions or hiding behind protocols and/or bad body language as they did to a large extent in 2015 then I fear the reaction will not be good."""""

this stuff is not price sensitive .. and really make no difference to the news that has been released as that has resulted in price movement,

The question of interest will be "why" ..and that discussion at AGM is of interest which will not affect the share price but would indicate the risk of how long this will take etc.

however the Q and A will yet again be all about Cash raising etc ... why no deals .. in other words valuable time will be used up by shareholders asking questions that cannot be answered

with Ivy claiming "hiding behind protocols" thus giving him yet again the opportunity to attack the BOD

Come on Boom .. you know Ivy's history on this subject stop trying to defend the indefensible, the reason why we have had so many spats is you just keep blindly defending bad posts ...

"" Hiding behind Protocols""" .. is an extremely bad post ..

just found this https://youtu.be/gnz5zlzsRYw

boom i don't know its something that has not been discussed in 7 years ... but we are talking tiny amounts ,,, 8 mg .. the whole point of the electrical burst is total precision relative to 8 mg ...that electric field is in a very small area

Now back to Ivy ...

stuck in his Lecture ... is this " hiding behind protocols"

now Boom if you and TF are not prepared to shoot down his posts ... you need to answer why ?

is this the New Era of Civil Disobedience ... greed of knowing information that others do not have access to unless they attend the AGM is that Fair .. ?

I assume it comes pre loaded, as that is a revenue source for Ichor .. otherwise you would be in all sorts of issue with contamination

another point i was at the AGM .. you have never attended one ..