Member Info for in4cedros

Irene - glad you mentioned reminding readers about previous posts - how about a reminder of the sweepstake entries - perhaps you could talk us through your rationale for predicting 0 bopd for Saffron - how's that looking after the latest rns Irene?

LayLadyLay - i'm proud of that post - it's a pity you didn't reproduce it in it's entirety - it was a reply to another poster who was suggesting, unrealistically, there would be a Placing ( where have we heard that before? ) .

By taking the further loan now LK gives himself plenty of breathing space to develop the opportunities which even posters like you, grudgingly, increasingly value at over 6p!

LayLadyLay - I'm really worried you've had to open a new box of Pampers over the share option strike prices - spare a thought for Irene and the other trolls who rossannan deterred from buying at 2.5p - how do you think they feel when they read your post and it dawns on them that even someone with your history of negativity is now seriously concerned over ' accretive investment ' at levels as high as 6p!

Rugby — more than that - it’s got to be worth, minimally, a modest box of Celebrations !

Irene - it's interesting that you haven't mentioned the sweepstake since the last rns - perhaps you're not too confident now about your 0 bopd suggestion.

I didn't bother with your sweepstake but I'm pretty confident the result at Saffron is going to be transformational for you as I'm going to be reminding people on here regularly of the stance you took and you'll probably vanish from the board soon after just like the Trollmaster rossannan!

For the avoidance of doubt it’s not me reporting posts - if it was they would have gone much sooner!

No panic from me LLL just social comment on motivation for posting.

Not that it’s a live issue at the moment but as I’ve said before if you’ve got expertise that proves there’s no future in deep drilling Cedros I’d be very happy to encourage you to personally present at the next AGM as it could save CERP a fortune. From what I’ve seen you’ve got nothing, except some unexplained negativity towards CERP, which is permitted on these boards - all pantomimes need a villain at this time of year but you do need to work on your jokes, as has been said before!

any - Andy presented at the TP evening and should have known ( from the b/b comment ) that there was increasing concern about how the revised basis of new business production may impact on the break even date. Plenty of emphasis on new business figs but insufficient on costs - that was his prerogative but the SP has tanked since. As he is a sensible chap presumably the market thought he had deliberately decided not to deal confidently with that issue.

Perhaps the market has got it wrong and those betting against it will do well but for some the risks here are too high.

Irene - if you think today’s news is Krapp and that people should sell why don’t you just say so - or are you scared you will look even more of a mug - 0 bopd forecast wasn’t it - we haven’t seen you reposting the sweepstake numbers lately - surely a good time to remind people where you stand LOL!

Irene - if all else fails how about more moronic questions -here's another - were you the guy who stood up and berated Bill Gates at the Microsoft AGM for not buying more ?

Irene - I'm surprised you want to talk about buying as you appeared unusually stimulated by the 30k sell yesterday at 2.75p - someone has bought a 20k slab at 3.34p this morning plus overwhelming smaller buys - do you think that buyers agree with your forecast of 0 bopd.

Abysmal trolling Krapp - at least LLL tries to put some meat in the sandwich !

Irene - thanks for that informative last post - not sure why you are pretending to be fence sitting as, correct me if I'm wrong you've already forecast 0 bopd in your own sweepstake!

Irene - I don't see annoyance, merely statement of facts - something that is usually absent from most of your posts which amount to sniping or asking moronic questions - try being less lazy, do some research and then state some facts or offer an opinion- you are allowed to do that - but you might be shot down in flames - is that what you are scared of?

any - I don't know but I'm interested to know why he thought it was worth taking a 75% loss on his loan to benefit shareholders of a company that was forecast to be cash flow positive a year later.

mossma - I've had a look now and I'm inclined to agree!

Fish - if I thought that Irene was in Year 6 I'd be more appreciative of her intellectual contribution to this board and that's pushing it to the max but if you take comfort from her I'm pleased for you !

Fish - I'm glad you agree my comment - ' I doubt that real trolls would recognise it as trolling - it is certainly less than purposeful ' .

I try to include a positive in my posts - well done fish for not becoming Irene's acolyte - asking moronic questions !

LayLadyLay - just because I've recently compared you favourably with the wannabe trolls doesn't mean I'm not going to critique your performance!

Those who read the funding rns carefully would know the Lind threshold was $25,000,000 not £25,000,000 so that the cushion is a bit fatter than you may have wanted people to believe. The threshold appears significant for the further tranche borrowing whereas under the BNP loan the covenants applied from the outset and left them calling the shots over management when Ritson ploughed on regardless with non commercial drilling.

Having said that if Saffron is a duster I would expect further softening of the SP so that Suriname would likely be financed by a Placing . At the moment no one knows - you seemed to be hinting Schroders knew something but it seems their selling is more down to Corporate Strategy !

We all wait and see now - a decent result here should lead to a much easier ascent to new levels of MC!

Rugby - well done for persisting with Krapp - you've clearly exposed her position ( or failure to take one haha !) - she lost credibility as a rossannan acolyte and doesn't have the confidence of Ross or LayLadyLay to come up with anything stimulating to troll this.

The trolling is of such low calibre from the double act of Irene and fish I doubt that real trolls would even recognise it as trolling - it certainly is less than purposeful.

Irene - rossannan was always drooling over TXP - they were recently quoting 95% COS - still would be too much risk for a Post Office book attitude Irene!

Irene - I posted to dim witted deramper 12bn that he might gain some credibility by explaining why we had 2 rns about TVR on different days quoting the same TVR number - are you or bubble blower able to fiSHED any light on it ?