Member Info for Hotfinance14

You have to wonder what the hell is going on regarding the Morocco trial.I recall Peter said he would b e having a meeting with OCP and this should now have happened.Peter needed to ask OCP what is causing the delay with the OEM testand if they don't know the actual reason they should have a call with the OEM explaining they are causing the delay in a very important trial and costing OCP money each month.Put as much pressure on them as they can. This should have happened months ago even before Peter joined the company.

Valkor need to send those samples to QED.

This may be a great tool but are shipping companies aware of it and uusin it ?

'6 months since the Sparkle trial, no signs of commercial supply agreement/permitting?'

Staggering how long this is taking and I recall they don't expect revenues from Sparkle until the end of the year.

I recall the infamous SC informing us we should have revenues in Q425!!!

''Importantly for me is that since October, QED had NO AGREEMENT with Nouryon. Surely the other parties in the Bipartite agreements would want that QED+Nouryon agreement in place before starting the trials, as it is the agreement that guarantees supply of the chemicals that are used to make the fuels they will be trialling?'

We wre told after Oct 25 they still had an agreement 'in good faith'.

AKHM...there goes your super optmism it was connected to a commercial agreement.There was never any chance of that.

Financial Times: Maersk, the world’s second-largest container shipping line, is looking at boosting the use of ethanol as a green fuel for its vessels to cut reliance on China.

AKHM...There is no negativity at all.It is being rational.By your logic they had a multi year contract before because they did not expect a commercial contract in that period.

AKHM..Your over optimism coninues to amaze me.

Extended only to Oct 2026.I wonder why it is such a short extension.

'Think he stated Q1 for this piece of news. I may be wrong.'

He stated January

SN88...i think you will find there is a big differebce in investing in a company and being ther CEO of the company. Ask yourself this question. You are offered a CEO poition in a stable well established company on £400k per year with options and also offered a CEO position on the same pay but even more options with a pre commercial company but it may not exist in the next 2 years. I think i know what job you would take.

AKHM...ask any CEO and they would prefert to be at a stable company on a good salary rather than a pre commercial company that may not exist in the near future. AS you say Peter could make millions but life is not all about making millions.Stability and less risk have to be taken into account,

It is only 15 working days until the end of January so not long left for our new CEO to reach his target for the shipping agreements. I doubt they will be signed by the end of the month so this will be his 2nd own goal. He originally had November as his target timescales but from the AGM at the end of November they seemed no way nearee.

I think investors need to put things into perspective regarding our new CEO. He has much more focus and drive than JM/AM but his no magician He is a standard CEO with a lot of contacts in the marine sector. Some posters have even said his a world class CEO.If he was he would not be the CEO of a pre commercial tiny UK company.

However if he does meet these January targets I will be over the moon.

Contributes nothibng to the company.Should never of been a board member.Even fell asleep at one AGM.

Barking..spot on and I very much doubt the MSC bilateral agreements will be signed off this month.

Happy New Year Vince.Let's hope this year is not talk the talk with nothing happening like previous years.

I hope you got that adidas tracksuit from santa this year ol boy.

I can't see how the company can justify a technical director position.Surely JM does not need further assistance as we have not even started any trial yet.

'Did Peter not say, at the AGM, that we have enough funds to get to commercial supply? I appreciate we have been led on a merry dance for years but I still think we should take Peter on his word.'

He did say that but it doesn't mean will be in cash poitive position.No doubt there will be a future fund raise.

…'. Surely the 2025 Sustainability Report ;-)'

I agree but will not impact the SP. Very poor that Linda did not complete this in 2025.

AKHM..What will your thoughts be if he doesn't get the agasreements signed this month ? What other news are you expecting this quarter ?