RE: Fundamentals26 Apr 2018 18:12
“Another ED project with better financing will be the nail in the coffin”
So they have come out of section 15-16 in profit, they now have a **free carry** on the oil and gas that comes out...
If they repeat this, they have a repeatable plan. They have partners, they are less risky as they have done it, proven it.
Each individual deal can be done for a percentage or two better and then at the back end they can come out with several % more. Some deals could even be done up front, dependant on IP’s produced.
When you prove something, it becomes easier to repeat, people have trust in you (as individuals before or wouldn’t have got the deals) and as a company, a collective, now.
Your constant bashing of the board and clearly something else is laughable as the boards reputation will continue to grow in the oil and gas industry as yours plummets here!
First you slate the IP despite being in the top 3%. Then you slate the revenue, baring in mind we have only just started to realise good gas sales also.
Then you dream up a collapse in oil price.
Then you quote all the expenses which you never forget all of, but conveniently always forget to add all of the credits up to offset them.
You attribute nothing to DTU, don’t even acknowledge the 15% uplift in oil and gas revenues in the Permian test, in an industry desperate for a solution to that problem. You assume giving out the caps is a negative, to me it shows as a premium sponsor at nape they had a lot of people visit their stand and it upped their profile further still.
Why don’t you just go and enjoy the Sunshine?