RE: Monthly hearing1 May 2018 07:51
Is did sound as if Renegade tried to get the application withdrawn not through anything other than a technicality that “technically Highlands are not a mineral rights holder and shouldn’t be allowed to pool”
A lot of effort went into them trying that and if fortunately wasn’t upheld with Highlands view of “Surely the right to drill, grants you the right to pool and on other grounds of basically it not being right”
Anyway, for those that didn’t listen it indeed did sound as if it was going against us with the first few summary’s sounding like they agreed with Renegades interpretation, even if some understood Highlands point, but they must have simply asked those people with those views first.
When it went round it did indeed go our way.
The good thing is that we should hopefully now get to the why pooling should go ahead, or not, rather than arguing a simple technicality on if we have rights to ask to pool or not.
Token film link - At a minimum we should now get to showcase section 15-16, the fact that we don’t need more doo-ers in our movement, and the fact that the popular people’s front are sat of there (points at just Ed). -
So hopefully we get to show, pool and get 2 more of these (producing effecient pads) don’t pool and you have Renegade doing nothing and it’s in the interests of COGCC and everyone to do this (pooling and spacing)
That’s my two cents anyway. Still some back and forth to go, but definitely good that we got through last night, surely our “showcase final” will be better.
Fingers crossed for later.