Member Info for HHReturns

Fair points, although I don't know why they didn't also take the opportunity in the RNS to mention the cash as of yesterday as well. That would have given an extra point of reference to see the trajectory, and many companies do similar.

Nothing particularly unexpected in there, with delays in the funding rollout impacted on decisions and there are some positives in there (cash position, decisive action to cut overhead during this period and the outstanding Ofsted recognition likely to put Code in a good position to secure the contracts)

None of that is likely to prevent the stock taking a hit today. An opportunity to add maybe, if you believe in the long term direction of travel, as signalled in the RNS.

At least we'll get more trades today!

The 2021 element is different, as those holders clearly wanted that incentive to participate, but the later ones? Perhaps they are one and the same. Either way, done now, and hopefully Panr succeed.

Great joke Parker. Ok then, how about this one? Why pay the loan off at all with placing funds? Why not just not place that element at all? Why place to repay debt already established and in place?

Why have they paid off Bonds that were set up when the SP was 70p odd, with shares issued at 21p? Hindsight and all that, but why didn't they place at 50p plus rather than this?

Come one someone. Take this sack of sheete over for £1 a share. Put us out of our misery and we can all buy lollies with our lolly.

The liquidity hasn't been great here of late, with little buying and any dummy sells of even small size being NT. I can at least get a quote to sell 12,500 shares currently, which is better than for the last couple of days whenever I have tried.

Cue for someone to probably sell 12,500 shares lol.

In theory they are only mandatory if the number of shares in issue has changed during the month. We used to do a monthly giveaway raffle to every staff member who could get their tongue at least a metre up MM's a hole and so they were a regular event. People's tongues are getting a bit sore after all these years and so they need a rest.

Exactly. Dilute everyone to buttons at 1p a share and below followed by a quick shuffle of the pack via a name change so that new people comings to SATS don't realise the dilution to come. Very nasty, but it will sadly probably have the desired effect. Well dodgy

It is still nuts how Whey isn't hedged though, or at least managed better.

Anyone on the board claiming those buys today? (or any of the sells)

Fly my pretty, fly.

https://youtu.be/xBCXCwW5pRw?si=O9CIsSfVg45h3vc6

They do have £5m plus in assets though avocet, albeit a bit is goodwill. Nat-West were happy enough to lend £1.5m at low rates on the strength of their assets, so stronger than many small caps. The outstanding rating can only benefit them with the bidding processes.

Will do

It gets little volume currently. A few sells hit it just as some decent buys) as and when would move it the other way. Bleating about that doesn't achieve anything.

Are you still holding the same level as before here Joe? Your posts are getting more and more negative and soon laden.People rarely change.

I am saying that at least now you are quoting something a little more accurate as a starting point for discussion, so that it progress versus the first 100 times you posted that, I suppose.

We'll get you sane in the end, I promise. Either that or we'll get you sectioned but we'll do one or the other.

If quoting APN and Warpaint for comparison, please please can you use Enterprise Value (i.e including debt) rather than just market cap. You must have posted the same message 100 times and whilst people get the point (in which case why keep repeating it), it isn't accurate due to differing levels of debt. If you are buying a house which is valued at £200k, with £100k mortgage and £100k equity, you can't just buy the equity as the mortgage has to be paid off or at least transferred over as well. It's the same here, so the read over comparisons aren't accurate due to different debt levels that come into the valuation mix.

Bon, some of the shares convert at 0.2p a share and some at 1p a share. It isn't surprising that the demand was unprecedented as they could sell shares bought for 0.2p at 20p and make an immediate 100 bag. They are only paying fractions of the SP though. If demand was unprecedented then why couldn't they raise at near the SP rather than 5% ISH of it?

We'll see if much comes out from an AGM statement on Thursday. Sometimes there is substance on AGM day and sometimes not.