RE: Shame1 Mar 2025 09:30
Some of us have made very strong arguments for why the jurisdiction risk is overplayed here and they are never rebutted, instead the claims are simply repeated further down the line so here goes again with a comparison to Resolute mining:
Resolute are based on Mali with western executives that have no link to the nation. Mali is a country that’s seen a civil war since 2012 with insurgencies springing up all over the place - executives being effectively captured and held to ransom occurred due to a combination of the above factors.
Thor is a Nigerian based company with Nigerian executives. The board is littered with individuals with strong business connections in Nigeria, with a history of success and commitment to the country and therefore have developed relationships with senior figures in the government. Additionally there have been no coups in Nigeria for decades.
So as you can see it’s light and day despite Resolute (poster boy for the risks used on here, alongside Barrick) and THX both operating in the general West Africa region.
That’s not to say Nigeria isn’t still a riskier nation to operate than say, Canada, or Australia, but in return THX have some of the lowest costs of any gold producer globally and have been saving $20m+ a year in corporation tax due to the holiday given to them as an incentivise and ‘pioneer’ in the country.
So on surface yes risky, dig a bit deeper and there’s easily an argument to be made that the risks are way overblown.