Member Info for haggismchaggis1

Tiny compared to the number of shares in issue, not tiny in value at £10.38k. How many PI's have portfolio's that big, let alone can buy that much of one stock in one trade? 25% of PI's?

CrustyKnob, you are on filter so no point starting threads of abuse targeting me.

For those unaware, I proved CrustyKnob wrong several times, and instead of accepting he was wrong, he grew a massive chip on his shoulder, which means he now posts abuse directed at me at every opportunity. This is YOUR board, so maybe you can make him wind his neck in and stop doing it before this becomes yet another lse board destroyed by personal abuse.

Or if the price is meaningfully higher, just sell only enough to cover the cost of the new shares, then you end up with more shares at no extra cost. That way the share price takes less of a hit if many people do it.

But who holds the warrants and will they exercise them?

ASK is being walked up. MM's maybe testing to see if Miton are still around, unless they already know they are not.

1.467 then 1.47, now 1.482

For sure. 1.44 or 1.45 is sells. 1.47 and 1.48 are buys.

As usual the one that is wrong AGAIN resorts to personal abuse.

As usual the one that is wrong AGAIN is ignoring the fact stayed in the RNS:

"APT has recently received the first batch of field seismic data and expects to have processed and interpreted sufficient data to confirm the final drilling location of the Chikumbi-1 ("CH-1") well before the end of August. Field acquisition continues in order to complete the 338km2 3D seismic programme."

Post of abuse reported to admin, and the abuser back on filter.

Read the bashers rules and you'll see that this is exactly the way garmoan, DW, number, ade, git, etc operate. It's not rocket science to realise they have read it and do what it says, and have destroyed this board and stopped a lot of investors from investing in AFC, and making weak holders sell out, especially those that don't really understand the company or its product and timelines to commercial sales.

https://boards.fool.com/bashers-handbook-12158605.aspx

Not sure they would be able to mix their oil with biofuel without the QFI process and surfactants, as the two oils will separate like oil on water.

Just try mixing olive oil and sunflower oil in a bottle and then watch as the separate at different levels.

The QFI process gets round this by wrapping nanometre sized particles in water and surfactant, which isolates the particles and prevents them from separating.

Title
(EN) OIL-IN-WATER EMULSIONS
(FR) ÉMULSIONS D'HUILE DANS L'EAU

Abstract
(EN) This invention relates to oil-in-water (water continuous) emulsions that can be used as fuels, in particular oil-in-water emulsions comprising glycerol. The invention also relates to a process for their preparation and to fuel compositions comprising such emulsions.

https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2022118044&_cid=P21-L69X1F-90897-1

Reading the description page on that link will give you all the info.

Well done to those, like me, that expected the core CH-1 location to be fast tracked, whilst the rest of the seismic data acquisition continues.

Those that said that wouldn't happen, we know who you are!

I am keeping it civil. Someone posted a rant at me, told me to stop posting, swore at me and said my posts were boring. All I did was filter them and report them, and today is the first time I've seen them post since then so I presume they got a 3 day ban to cool off, but then they post more abuse targeting me today.

I'm guessing said poster has a chip on their shoulder about me for some reason, as I cannot see why a genuine QFI shareholder would want me to stop posting, or genuinely find my research 'boring', so what is the REAL deal for the abuse I wonder.

In any case, I will just keep reporting any abuse they post, simples.

Tetrolite,

Yeah, that one started off on this board with that kind of post many months ago, hence was on my filter list after less than a handful of posts. I get the feeling that is what they wanted though.

Jack,

Well spotted, thanks for sharing!

You were back on filter after my last post of good advice, as I have no interest in reading any more of your abusive posts today. I'll just have a quick peek at this one tomorrow at 8am and report it if it's more of the same kind of abuse you've been targeting at me (I'm fully aware the admins don't work at weekends, so no point doing anything about either post right now).

Another post the report, thanks. You really need to take up meditation or something, get rid of all that pent up anger.

Alt,

Absolutely!

Garmoan started his first posts here with negative spin and attacking AB. I said he was devious from not long after that, but others just let him carry on for 3 years by responding to him as if his posts had some credibility when clearly from reading them again now they did not. He's got a lot worse as we know, with his bashing losing the subtleness of the deramps and becoming far more blatant and obvious, which is why so many have now cottoned on to his agenda.

He has contributed nothing of any real value to this board in 3 years, just destroyed it, which was his aim from day one, so he is sitting there congratulating himself that most people have left this board. Will lse admins ban him for it? Not a chance.

DaProphet,

Agreed.

There's a big difference between free speech and posting lies, misinformation, disinformation, and other attacks on companies, where the poster clearly has an agenda to destroy any positive sentiment for a stock for their own benefit. I see it every day on this site. They do the absolute minimum required to enforce the terms and conditions that all posters acknowledge when they sign up to this site. Listed companies deserve a far more proactive approach that removes 99.9% of such attacks on them via this site.

HIs post of abuse targeted at me got deleted, and he possibly got blocked from posting for a few days because of it. All he has to do it filter me if he doesn't like my posts, instead of posting abuse that breaches the lse bb terms of use, simple isn't it really.

Here are the first two posts garmoan made on AFC. As you can see, and as I have been saying, he has been attacking AFC and AB since day 1.

These first two posts are the same garbage he has been repeating day after day for 3 years.

=======================================
9 Dec 2019 17:37

Garonne
Posted in: AFC
Posts: 2,272
Price: 16.50
No Opinion

RE: Excellent posts09 Dec 2019 17:37

First time posting here but LTH. Although there's a lot of positive feedback and hopes for imminent orders, I'm very worried about the constant SP erosion as I'd hoped we'd finally turned a corner with the market starting to recognise the value of AFC. Think we need some news soon to reverse the trend.

===================================
10 Dec 2019 07:20

Garonne
Posted in: AFC
Posts: 2,272
Price: 16.50
No Opinion

No News10 Dec 2019 07:20

The lack of any formal feedback from the investor day is poor on AB's part. Expectations have been built up and nothing. I just hope the SP doesn't slip further as a result.

===================================

So there is some evidence for you, to back up what I earlier today (I've corrected the number of days, as I have since found his first AFC post as above):

Who would spend virtually every day of 966 days trying to think up negative misinformation to try and put investors off investing in AFC Energy?

Who would continually lie about holding the stock, when clearly from their circa 966 days of attacking it they never have owned it?

Why would they continue to do this during every price movement, throughout all uptrends and downtrends, even when the price was shooting up to 80p and they could have made a huge profit?

1) A disgruntled ex-director or ex-employee that hates the company so much that it is a vendetta
2) An employee of a competitor
3) Someone employed by or paid by a shorting hedge fund like Brontë
4) Someone paid by a disgruntled ex-director that could afford to pay them to trash a company they hate