RE: Thoughts ?9 Aug 2023 12:48
Yes BBH we only want justice and the compensation that comes with true justice, Argentina wants to put their country in order to eventually bring their country back to its glory days and be self sufficient in its national resources, it can achieve that ok but not at the cost to innocent YPF oil and gas investors, Burford has taught them a legal costly lesson, essentially don't steal from foreign investors or you'll pay dearly for it ,in national interest and monetary terms, just look at near the bottom of this link's text, =
According to the Contrahegemonía website, “the priority for the Government, the opposition, and the economic power is to organize the country around extractivism as a project of capital accumulation and national dependence. That is to say, to exploit as much of nature's common goods as possible, transforming them into ”commodities“, merchandise destined for the international market. The objective: to obtain dollars to pay the IMF and private funds.”
If they want all this then surely they had better pay all their international court lead debts, though mostly Burfords because of its huge size, though I would say that,
Argentina is going to do very well long term if it shows the world it recognises international courts and there legal determinations, and from that it then harnesses the big oil and gas companies firing power/ billions of investment money to get tax money back from the oil and gas sales,+ save on these exact imports, they can't presently really afford to completely invest in these oil and gas reserves themselves so it's essential that they court the big multinational oil and gas companies themselves with a solemn pledge to demonstrate that they respect international courts determinations and honour any financial settlement awards that flow from international courts, to do all that they really need to now start to respectful work on how they can at least show to the world that they are trying to deal with our upcoming very large settlement award, or at least pay a very large bond payment down if they wish to appeal the courts determinations or decisions, that's their legal right to do that ok, but not to then say they can't afford a large appeal bond payments, then they should put the ownership/ shares of the YPF company as a appeal bond payment, I'm sure Burford would be delighted at that gesture or development, I certainly would welcome that offer, and why not make that offer, if they are so sure they have a good case to win then put your chips on the table and take your chances, though we all know they have lost here no matter what chips they throw on the table, it's make your mind up time here, they obviously want to appeal to delay bringing this financial news to their own electorate right now, also they don't want to put a massive amount of money into a appeal bond, so it's possibly a appeal bond of some kind or another and hopefully one of a very large size,