RE: English, for the benefit of Oz4 Mar 2023 15:48
Hi Jimmy...
Whilst I am not planning to try to front run any figures...
(I have my own hunches
But really want new figures...if any... to come first from Paul at the appropriate time)
I do agree that it's possible we could see bigger numbers from MOU1 ...not least of which as we have some very decent measurements already from MOU2...
A lot of folk seem to have totally overlooked such success already at MOU2 !!!
Thus, the scope seems to be available for MOU1 to prove up greater lateral extents than publicised to date
So far, what we are seeing is fitting in remarkably well with my own 'thoughts'
Personally, I would be a bit surprised if the resources available from MOU2 did not exceed pre drill estimates...
partly due to the much thicker sand bodies...( We know of course that there is an improving relationship between sands thickness and productivity per metre...methodology did great analysis work on that subject)
And partly...as I think Keith pointed out...due to the greater gas expansion factor we should experience at greater depth
To the market...
We would appear to be in a bit of limbo...hence silly SP imo
To those who understand ...
We would appear to be in a terrific position
Regards
GRH