Oh for an intelligent politician ... of topic, but how far?8 Aug 2024 00:25
Apart from light entertainment and comical utterances, politicians today are appalingly lacking in common sense, no matter what their idelogy or party. There once was a time when politicians said what they mean and meant what they say, and it largely meant sense.
Former PM (Paul Keating) of Australia to former Deputy PM (Kim Beazley)
Kim Beazley is utterly wrong, says Paul Keating
Kim Beazley is utterly wrong in arguing that Western Australia is at risk from China (“Beazley: WA is most open to attack by China”).
China has neither the intention nor the need to attack the West Australian coast for any purpose – especially when it can buy and secure all the minerals it reasonably needs in the marketplace, including – and particularly – iron ore.
Alarmist utterances of this kind, which Kim specialises in, are designed simply to inject drama as cover for the facilitation of US naval emplacements in Western Australia, which Kim enthusiastically supports.
If Kim or any other Austral-Americans truly believe China presents a military risk to Australia, why do they so blithely support Australia continuing to ship 900 million tonnes of iron ore annually to the supposed “enemy”?
If one truly believed China was a militarily aggressive state and was focused on military conquest of Australia or even Western Australia, one would be arguing for the immediate cessation of the iron ore trade.
But Kim is not arguing that. And he is not arguing that because he knows China has no intention in attacking Australia. And as for his analogy that half a dozen nuclear submarines firing traditional torpedoes, the same torpedoes our current Collins class boats fire, would represent some “hungry panther” in our backyard looking out for us – this is simply comic book material.
There are 20,000-odd shipping movements a year around Australia – does Kim really believe six subs with only two on station, firing eight or 10 traditional torpedoes, would be capable of protecting a shipping fleet of that scale? Or more than that, dealing with the 60-odd submarines China already possesses and can field?
The answer for Australia in dealing with China is common sense, trade and diplomacy – not local drama from warship enthusiasts like Kim who, in respect of China, are happily singing from the US songbook.
Paul Keating, Potts Point, NSW
Good on ya Paul...keep it up !!! Its amazing the rhetoric that jumps and sees a foe under every bed, and wanst spend billions on buying bombs and isslies and nuclear submarines, when there are far more sustainable options to follow that have worked in the past few decades ..diplomacy, treating people with dignity, trade, ...etc
PS we have about 34,000 of coast line, which is nuclear sub about every 8,000 coast line kms...??? plus or minus a few kinks ...
best
the gnome