RE: t/o views19 Jan 2019 19:12
tiger - read the sky news article, you mention.
i note many are suggesting what may or may not be wrong doings from various bod's, i guess any potential evidence will ultimately find itself on the desk of the appropriate powers that be. It will then be for any regulators to assess the position.
others are suggesting what they would do next if they were various parties / bods, bb's are often enjoyable reads, are they not.
interesting comment re your view on many business reputations that are to be ruined, again i'll wait to see.
I'll sit and watch things pan out, am quite relaxed whatever the outcome, have a balanced portfolio, of quality FTSE 100 & 250 shares as the major part of my uk investments though i like to play, with a small % of my S &S ISA with recovery and aim shares. Made a nice return on FLYB in Nov on a small in and out trade. To be honest i followed one of your colleagues in the FCA group Moniman in with a trade on FLYB, at just over 10p, however i sold out the same day and took my profit on the deal.
I note its the view of the FCA group that 8.00 am on the 11th Jan, is the agreed cut off date for their proposed compensation claims, effectively that puts Tinker in the opposing camp does it not ?
As Tinker was busy snapping up those share sold off by pi's on the Connect t/o news rns later that morning.
Does that follow in your view that in those circumstances, if pi's and Hosking, are in the same camp, Tinker is in the opposing camp to Hosking ?
Gosh its getting complicated, i'm sure all will become clear,as the days, weeks and months pass.
I have no crystal ball so make no predictions as to what comes next. Although i was not invested, i recall, a similar shareholders, action group formed on the demise of CLLN - what a chaotic mess that bod made of things, parliamentary committees to attend etc to explain themselves, all over the national news with accusations of corporate failing, i believe corporate fraud was even levied by some,made interesting tv, though i'm not sure any shareholder compensation has been forthcoming from that shambles.
I generally feel for the lth's over on FLYB that decided to hold firm on years of grim rns news, less so for those that bought up their shares, when they fell to sub 9p on the up for the sale news, and held through nov to Jan for their multi bags, possibly to be caught out by their greed.
Many of these guys are in the FCA group, screaming that the bod of flyb has let them down, they weren't in the least concerned that the shares they picked up cheap at the time originally belonged to genuine lth's who also lost out, big time. but that's share trading for you.
I wonder if it had turned out differently, and those hyped bids, of 30p / 50p / 90p etc, had come to pass, would they have donated their winnings to charity?
Interesting times ahead.
gla