RE: Presentation comments20 Jan 2025 21:34
Esduk agree with comments
They need to control the narrative with slides, it was a bit lazy.
Why not have slide saying spending 2.3m for key equipment and driving SPAC. Just deal with it head on
Because there was no SPAC slide the subject came up via questions on minimums. A good communicator would say, well that is not too relevant in our opinion. Look at the rns for comparable. Why would you answer that question and leave it hanging.
This was a very science based we ask the questions given. That is not the point of the call, you answer questions framed in your narrative.
There are questions on partnerships, no mention that cotec publicly stated twice discussions with apple, ebay. Even tesla!