Member Info for G_G_G

ss, i'm glad you've come around to what i've been saying, and not the way i've been saying it.

dbh, you and others need to stop talking about dd being done by new investors at historical lows. it means absolutely nothing to lths with averages in the 20's, 30's and 40's, even after they have averaged down, like me. of course, the new investors would have done it. and they would have been laughing their @sses off at calamity baay coming to them with a begging bowl to pay for all his f@ck ups and conning the market, which is how they have not only picked up 20% of the company for peanuts, but he has even thrown in a ned role just to make sure they'll give him the cash. all done 2.5 months early, before casc 5 and central spud. the dd has been done by them to ensure they more than double their money in 2 years when the pricing contracts change, whilst lth's will still be waiting to break even or get out with a loss in the mid 20's. why the hell should people 'look forward' and let the charlatan off the hook? i want the pr!ck crucified for what he has done. and we're still not out of the woods as casc 5 flowing at a good rate is the only well that has a better than even chance of giving us a good result. casc 4 is f@cked. he just isn't saying it because he's a d@dgy b@ll****artist. the fact they're still working on it, and he hasn't committed to a hook-up date, says everything you need to know if you assume he is full of ****. and then central success relies on a circus full of clowns finishing a well and hitting economical gas in an area where shell didn't bother drilling all these years. these guys are meant to know casc and have made a mess of things. they have even drilled a well for gas and hit oil. so i'm not holding my breath on them discovering anything at central.

calamity baay has cost us 2 x wells in fees alone on the failed trin deal, failed raise with d@dgy brothers, debenture @ 16p conversion, and new raise at 11p. absolutely extraordinary when you combine that with $7-8m on casc 4 (f@cked up twice) with costs still climbing. and worse still, the raise + casc 4 f@ck ups meant that we couldn't afford to fix or drill any more wells, so the real cost needs to include all the lost production from 3 wells not flowing from q1 to q3. just think about that. the real costs in casc 4 f@ck ups, fees, and lost production, and you're getting to $25-30m. all completely wasted due to the extraordinary incompetence and deceit of one man. instead, we have central, alongside a **** ton more shares at 11p, 16p, 20.5p and $65m in debt.

this is why he needs to be held to account for everything moving forward being on time and target. if casc 5, casc 4 and central are all a success, then great, we can 'all look forward'. but if just two of them are late and/or poor, then he needs to go, and someone competent needs to take his place.

I'm definitely holding a grudge against my losses Zero, who the f@ck wouldn't with close to 2m shares and down over £100k. Selling though, again who the f@ck would do that at all time lows (inflation adjusted), after Lyin Paul has diluted our ownership by 20% at 11p to pay for his litany of mistakes.

As for Discord, they're a completely useless group of shareholders who came together to pressure senior management to do a better job. Instead, they sit around jerking each other off whenever Calamity Baay speaks (lies) to them, and then defend the man every time he doesn't deliver on those words. They've almost become cult like in their belief in him. Some of them should be getting paid by TXP and Calamity Baay as their PR machine. Although any payment wouldn't come from Baay, as he only likes to put his hand out, and makes the company (shareholders) pay for his mistakes. The 'line' drawn by John27, who is their lead spokesperson, is laughable from an execution standpoint, and only reinforces he/they have no interest in holding him to account for our losses or ensuring that if he f@cks up again, we'll push to remove him.

So I've now sold at a loss? I thought I was trading and deramping for a lower price? You need to make up your mind, Zero.

cross, you have so many things wrong here. firstly, mm's don't create liquidity; this comes from people selling and buying i.e. basic supply and demand. on the supply side, you have no one selling because they are all sitting on massive losses due to calamity baay not delivering a single thing on target in an entire year, and instead f@cking up everything he has touched, including withholding and lying about material information. and then on the demand side, no-one in their right mind will put money in here when they're dealing with one of the most incompetent and deceitful ceos on aim. he has turned us into a casino stock at the moment. only concrete, good news will shift the share price. if casc 5 comes online with high flow rates, which will be the only piece of good news this year, then you'll have your liquidity and a small bump to the sp. no doubt sirtradesalot will be hard at work pumping and dumping as well.

as for a good rns yesterday - sorry you'll need to point out why our mgt team getting a tiny amount of cheap shares and freebies at bargain basement prices (that they created) is good? clearly not that good because it did nothing to the share price. also, no one has come back on the new proposed executive share plan. from what i can work out, they want to go with a 'buy 1, get one free' plan - is that correct?

looks like john27 has disappeared on the matter of drawing a line with calamity baay. seems he wants to forget everything that has happened to date, and only throw softballs at him on execution, which just so happens to be the only thing that matters to the sp. oh, and it's not lyin paul's fault that shareholders have lost over £100m of their hard earned money in 2 years, it's actually shareholders' fault for not doing dd on him being a completely inept shyster and somehow knowing that he was withholding material information from them. you can see how calamity baay has remained in charge when the leader of a shareholder group (discord) designed to hold the b@ll****artist to account, after a years of delays and monumental f@ck ups, is 'drawing a line at' 1. casc 5 only needs to be economical, 2. central only needs to be spud this year, 3. casc 4 only needs to be tied in pre-january 31st, but we won't say anything about whether it needs to be economical. oh, and everyone needs to be quiet and supportive, and only judge calamity baay and the sp from now.

Sorry meant to say 'operational' risk. And yes, timelines slip. But Casc 4 was meant to be spudded in Q4 2024!!! Casc 5 in Q1 2025!!! Central... What exactly constitutes 'slippage' for you? And as I said, it's Calamity Baay's Corporate failures and deceit that tanked the sp and led to the current mess we are in. Never seen this sort of thing happen before, so I wouldn't call it 'reality'.

Highland, Casc 4 was executional risk, twice. Corporate missteps that involved a failed last-minute bucket shop raise, and withholding material information on the loan terms are not Executional Risk. They are what took the sp from the low 20's to 12p, and not Casc 4. And the knocon is we now have 50% more shares printed at 11p and 16p. Plus millions paid in fees that we will never see again because it would appear we have no legal recourse against the bucket shop raise.

Another thing, 'I don't do echo chambers', seriously? That's exactly what you do. You built a Discord echo chamber and made sure that PB is never criticised or held to account.

john27, so let's get this straight, for you to agree to calling an egm calamity baay must not:

- f@ck casc 5

- miss the new cb spud date by at least a month, which is already many months late.

what about casc 4 flow rates? are you going to hold him to account on the well that is still costing us money above the current $7-8m, is over a year late, wrong drilling mud and re-entering the failed initial well whilst knowing the risks? or are you going to let him off the hook if it is less than 5mmcf? any 'failure' for you here? keep in mind that all the time and money wasted on casc 4 meant we weren't drilling any more wells, so the real cost is easily $15m over the past year.

and yes, you should align with me and other lth's given the years of excuses and support you have provided for calamity baay whilst pis have been rinsed. you are not to blame for believing in a conman, but you can take some responsibility for supporting and spreading his b@ll****.

and where was this line drawn months ago? what are you referring to here when we were still waiting on casc 4 & 5, and still didn't know what was happening with the funding gap that he sprang on the market...? where was it written? you keep telling investors to draw a line under things. we've now got to draw a line at 11p!!! no. the line needs to be drawn for calamity baay to deliver on these new, modest targets. but you're happy to give him a bunch of more failures before what, we have to draw another line at 9p?

as for jjr and purebond doing their dd, you have answered your own question. they are picking up shares at historical lows when accounting for inflation. yep, that's right, it has never been cheaper. great for them. but wtf does it have to do with lth's holding an omni-shambles ceo to account for these latest targets?

i have no idea what you are referring to on a 'conspiracy theory'.

clearly not going to get anywhere with you john27. you're basically saying that you'll 'send a letter first-class' if pb destroys the company even more than he already has with yet more massive f@ck ups. he gets to screw casc 5. central gets to be incredibly late. and let's forget about casc 4, omission of material information, misdirection, lies about our financial state, massive dilution, missed timings... and on each occasion, 'i spoke to him and he didn't have any choice, owned his mistakes, not his fault, told me about something new and amazing, so let's draw a new line and wait for...'. all the while the sp keeps sinking.

consider this, if your discord group was designed to be heard and pressure the ceo and bod, how effective has it been if everyone is sitting on life-changing losses? it's just a pb pr machine that has cost normal people a fortune.

Most importantly Nav, if Baay gets over those modest lines in the sand, which are less than his stated forecasts, then we should be sitting at 20p come the end of January. But no more leeway than these modest targets, which are simply him doing his f@cking job. He does not deserve any more rope given what has transpired, and the current sp with immense, avoidable, dilution to lths.

John27, I look forward to your response so I can draft a message. We can then align on the wording before it is sent. Most of the words will be based on your statements of 'failure' already; it's just those last two points, which again, I feel are more than generous to Baay given they are well beyond the original goalposts that have moved multiple times already.

Lukee, who did you email as the NOMAD? Can you put the address here?

Agree that we need to email the NOMAD. I think beyond this we should send the FCA some emails stating their duties to shareholders - I'll look into it. Because if the NOMAD and FCA get in touch and they say 'nothing to see here', then it will be a solid paper trail listing shareholder requests and concerns for them as well.

BB, I hate making excuses for well remunerated, incompetent mgt teams. But I must admit the majority of the sp decline has been largely driven by the Google AFD 'black swan' event. Until that point, they were doing a pretty good job. They were engaging with shareholders much more. And they had been growing the divisions for years.

BUT

They did massively f@ck up with Shinez. This would be worth 20p on our current share price. Debt would be $50-60m, which, even with Adj EBITDA failing to this level, would still give us plenty of runway for a reset. I have been saying for over a year that someone's head should have rolled on this. Not enough DD being done with a shady Israeli outfit (I say Israeli because they are well known for being d@dgy f@cks and hard to litigate) is completely unacceptable for even an amateur mgt team. They simply went out and bought everything in sight with the pandemic online windfall period, instead of growing responsibly. Just like ASOS.

AND

The current lack of investor engagement during a time when they should be doing more than previously is completely unacceptable. This is especially the case when the share price is being clearly manipulated and at it's lowest in history (inflation adjusted). They are failing at a range of their duties on this.

Quite appalling behaviour from them. If there's nothing rotten in the state of TIG, they must reassure the market. Even a simple statement that they are aware of the sp decline and still confident in hitting guidance. If that's the case, then why not say it? If not, well they are sitting on material information and that would be a massive f@ck up. They should have gotten ahead of the decline and reset guidance at $55-60m, and stating they are 100% confident in reaching this goal. Any profit warning now could create even more damage from a far lower base.

Otherwise, they are wilfully allowing the sp to sit at record lows and inviting a bid. This is where my head is going. And if something lands at sub 80p they will have f@cked lths for some deep poc-keted fund and/or Kestrel.

Aye, in case you haven't read them, my posts are about taking some concrete action. Unlike some on here, I want some 'lines to be drawn' for Baay. Because there is absolutely no way you, me, or any lth's will make money for years if he continues with the failures we have seen to date. Get on board with doing something for your investment, or filter me.

Exactly Nav. I want the best for lth's and my investment. We have been screwed again with the 11p raise. This unfortunate line is drawn, for now, on the share price. But a line needs to be drawn for PB, which has not been done before, and has led to where we are now.

Those 'failures' not happening are critical for the sp to reach just 20p. If Baay fails on two or more things, then we can conceivably be here for years. The sp is all that matters, and Baay needs to go if he makes any more mistakes.

We need to align on reasonable hurdles for the man to clear. Keeping in mind that 'reasonable' is still worse than the targets he has given us, some of which are already failures. If we can do this, and John27 commits to the draft email being sent, then I'll commit to not saying a negative word until the end of January i.e. I'll draw a line for myself.

Holding Baay to account, rather than deflecting on lth's who have huge losses, is the RIGHT way to do things.

Nav, I take immense offence to lth's and myself not having DD. Read my response and tell me how any DD could have been done on the failed 20.5p raise, loan terms, and even the last raise at 11p, where we were already locked in. Or the Casc 4 f@ck ups. Or not knowing the true state of our finances. These were things where material information was withheld, and/or we were misdirected or misled. Anyone wanting examples of those three words I will provide FACTS on for just the past 6 months.

I want John27 to make some firm commitments on Baay's performance. And if he fails on any of the things that John27 has already mentioned, and the two remaining things to be agreed upon, then he will push for an EGM to have Baay removed. It is completely beyond the pale to have a CEO in charge of a company whose value he has destroyed over the years, to continue taking a $800k package with even more failures. The sp is at its lowest point in history (inflation adjusted). With all of our assets. So what does that say to you about his ability to get us back above the 20.5p raise price alone.

John27, I take you to be a decent man. But there is no place for staing that lth's lack of research and DD is the reason for their losses, and they shoudl sell at a huge loss after a huge raise or shut up. John27 has also heavily influenced PIs around his conversation with PB, which,s to no fault of his own, h,e proven to be misleading or false. His words have encouraged investors to double down whilst Baay has been making a mess of things without our knowing. His words I have invested on previously (and Johno's).

So I want his commitment and his words to hold Baay to account for any more failings. The man has been given so much rope it's almost unfathomable.

John needs to 'draw a line in the sand' with PB, and not investors continually having to re-draw lines for his failures at a much lower sp.

As for me cutting out attacking Calamity Baay, that's only when you (Discord) and I (plus others sharing my view) agree on what constitutes failure.

I want your commitment, which I'm assuming is more valuable than Baay's, that any more f@ck ups will result in Discord being mobilised for an EGM. He has had years of destroying this company, so the whole 'judge him from now', after everything that has happened, is absolutely unacceptable. People in the last 2 years have lost over 80% of their investment, when we have great assets, but unbelievably incompetent mgt.

There are two things we still need to align on. My position and arguments as follows:

1. Central spud by end of December. I do not accept this as his failure date. It was meant to have been spud months ago. November (up to 30th) was the pushed out timings that he provided, so that's his failure date if you take the man at his word. I'll agree to mid December (16th), no spud, and it's a strike - deal?

2. I believe we should agree on Casc 4 flow rates. I'd propose that adding if the well is uneconomic (5mmcf or less), it's a failure to add to the list. This is a well that has taken over 12 months to complete from inital timings. It had the wrong drilling mud. It was re-entered when they knew the risks of doing so. It is now delayed further. For a cost of $7-8m and still growing, I believe that close to 'uneconomical' (5mmcf) is highly generous for Calamity Baay to have as a failure. Do you agree?

We are aligned on:

1. Casc 5 flow rates. I'll accept it can be difficult to judge on initial flow rates, so happy to go with your 5mmcf or lower pre-compressor. Agreed.

2. Casc 4 completion date. I'm assuming we are aligned on January 31st as his cut-off date for hook-up and gas flowing based on your last post? Agreed.

If you are in agreement on the two remaining points above, I will draft something that includes all of the things you have already committed to, and we can send to Baay and IR. This way Baay is held to HIS WORDS WITH GENEROUS LEEWAY, and any further failure, on top of the litany of failures over years, means he is held to account. The simple truth of the matter is another CEO would have done, and will do, a lot better with what we have. He gets one last, documented chance, to prove his $800k package.

that is complete and utter garbage john27, and you know it. you state things like 'he's mostly right' and then deflect and make excuses for calamity baay on an 11p raise saying 'he had no choice'. well, either he lied to everyone about all the other options, or he did a raise for over 20% of the company at the lowest share price in history (inflation adjusted) for a new entrant to enjoy the spoils that lth's were promised. and he did 2.5 months early. before casc 5, and central spud, which would have pushed the sp higher. did we all know he would do that? and even if we did, would you be selling and crystallising your losses before knowing?

tell me. should we have sold at 20-22p when we didn't know the raise funds hadn't been received? and then had no idea about the loan terms? and the additional funding required? what was the dd that was missed here by lth's and me? was that the thing that cratered the sp to 12p in a day?

the only thing you can accuse investors of doing is believing in a con man and his b@ll****. and ffs stop saying that investors, who are locked in here, need to sell at a massive loss, after a massive raise, or shut up.

appalling things to say, so cut with the cr@p that people on here like to come up with when they have run out of arguments and excuses. you're better than them, and you know these things to be untrue.

John27, I think that's a ridiculous amount of leeway for a CEO who has delivered nothing other than abject failure, and immense value destruction, which is evidenced by our worst sp in history (inflation adjusted).

I ask that you change your view on the following:

- Casc 5 - "If it’s not flowing commercially by mid-November (i.e. sub-5 MMcf/d or stuck indefinitely), that’s failure". That's not just failure, you are effectively talking about a write-off. That isn't even remotely acceptable as a target for Calamity Baay. This is a well that's 6 months late, and even late on its most recent pushed-out timings. Can you agree that Casc5 1. MUST BE COMMERCIAL, 2. MUST BE 10MMCF (GIVEN TARGET WAS 15MMCF).

- Central - "But if we get to end-December without a spud or clear explanation, that’s failure". Again, that is a ridiculous timeline given what has transpired. You are talking about a well that has been pushed back continually because we didn't have cash (Lyin Paul hasn't owned his complete ignorance or wilful deceit about our financial constraints), and you are giving him until the end of December? He should be given until the end of November. His original target was months ago. If he misses the new pushed-out target, that should be another strike. Do you agree?

- Casc 4 - "Sometime in the next 4 months...?" Seriously? Calamity Baay and his drilling team should have until the end of January to get Casc 4 cleaned up and online. No ifs, buts, or maybes. This is a well they have f@cked up twice. Over the course of a year. That has cost us 2x wells, and the cost is still growing. Not ok. If he fails to commit to a time-frame, then we should give him ours, which is incredibly generous. Failure to meet the timeline is another strike.

Everything else I agree with. But they should go without saying after what has happened to date. EXECUTION is most important, which he has already failed at multiple times this year alone, he should not be given any more leeway on the already pushed out timings and targets.

If Calamity Baay doesn't have his feet held to the fire on his incredibly late, new commitments, then when will you ever hold the man to his word? The Casc 5 and Central timeframes and targets are pushed out, and below his original flow rates. Should be easy. As for Casc 4, he needs to be given a date, and to say end of January (3 months) for it to be cleaned-up and flowing is more than generous considering it was meant to be finished Q4 2024!!! There's also no way the sp gets near 20p by the end of January if he doesn't deliver on these things. And that's still below the failed placing price.

Do you agree with these targets? And if so, will you be willing to share amongst the Discord Group and also forward to Baay as his reference point for an EGM being called by PIs? If you are happy to do this, then I'm more than happy to give him the time and space to DO HIS JOB and EXECUTE. I will also refrain from my attacks on the man.

SS, I understand your pov, but that doesn't mean we cannot get rid of the shyster. He doesn't have any skin in the game, it's not like he set up the company and has been funding and feeling the pain like we have. He'd probably not played so fast and loose if he had a couple of million in the company. Having said that, in all my time on AIM, I have never encountered a CEO deliberately withholding market-sensitive information like he has done. I'm sure it exists, but it's a minority even on AIM. Baay needs to be ousted.

Correct Nav.

Yeah, and there have been fewer trades than fingers on one of your hands, Spud. I do agree, however, that a 15mmcf Casc 5 result and Central spud should get this to 13-14p, at least until SirRampsALot starts trading.

smasher, i believe i have answered this question. the only difference between me and the rampers here is that i bash the mgt team, in particular calamity baay. i have never bashed the assets. and the prospect is why i bought here originally, and averaged own. the issue of course is that calamity baay has f@cked every single corporate action with unbelievable incompetence and negligence, and has diluted us into oblivion, such that a share price of 20p would have been +30p in old money with a raise at 20.5p and no additional funding in the secret loan terms.

i have averaged down, just like sirrampsalot, johno, john27 and most other lths. can you get your head around them averaging down? because they have invested even more than i, with averages much higher, regardless of the stories sirrampsalot tries to spin. i averaged down, believing that lyin paul would make amends for his deceit regarding the loan terms, to ensure we don't get diluted further. the bet was that he wouldn't f@ck over lth's to benefit a new entrant at 11p!!! i was wrong. he's a c@nt. and instead of a non-dilutory solution, he went for the easy option and gave away more than 20% of the company for peanuts pre-casc 5 results and central spud. a semi-principled f@cking monkey could have gotten this company to 30p, even after the trin fiasco. instead, he couldn't close a straightforward deal, leading to a panic raise with a bucket shop, for more money than what was required for the loan terms he didn't inform the market about. as i said, it's so unbelievable that when i tell people, they can't get their heads around it. i hate b@ll****artists. so imagine what i think of a charlatan who has cost my family a fortune, who has continually lied to the benefit of deep-pocketed new investors and to save his own skin. nothing can be undone now. i want the man crucified. and until i get an aligned commitment from his lead private investor pr asset in john27 on what constitutes 'failure', then i'll continue to remind people of his gross incompetence, negligence, deceit and how much we should be worth had we a remotely capable ceo.

my comments will do jack**** to the sp here. in the same way as sirrampsalot cannot push the sp. results will get us back to 20p. the issue is we haven;t had a good 'result' under calamity baay in close to 18 months. if you cannot get your head around how i have ended up with over £300k in this d@g, then try to work out how johno has invested more than £500k and sirtradesalot with his £750k or whatever he claims to have now.