Member Info for G_G_G

Another golden nugget from Zero:

'Here we have ggg's new mate taking up the mantle calling people liars etc. Disgusting i wish LSE would stop these people stating opinion as if they where facts. 25p will be broken with ease, just wait and see. Until then sure you keep sending emails to all these VIP's lol'

You say it's disgusting that people are stating opinions as if they 'where' facts, and then you go on to state 25p will be broken with ease. So an opinion following your f@cktard statement. Hilarious. Tell me Zero, when will we break this magical 25p barrier?

And people stating Calamity Baay is an incompetent liar are stating facts. He's also a devious, freeloading charlatan of a CEO. The list of lies and examples of his incompetence is as long as your arm, and the deviousness is his deliberately omitting and withholding material information from the market, which cause the share price to crater once we discovered his duplicity. Freeloader is self-evident. And the combination of everything makes the man a complete charlatan of a CEO. Again, go through those two lists and find errors in all of the FACTS I have stated.

The scary thing is that even after a raise that many on here were saying would be at a premium, which he did before we got Casc 5 and Central spud news, and for more than the funding gap amount, folks refuse to join the dots as to why it has all happened. We raised early because we needed the cash now for Central and the compressor - see RNS. And we raised more than necessary because we actually need it. Look at our funds flow from ops. I had the lowest estimate, and it was almost half what I had said should be expected. Casc 5 still not online - sometime in November now. Casc 4, sometime NEXT YEAR. And the legal case is not going ahead against Oak, d@dgy brothers, and the 'Middle Eastern' investor that SirRampsALot was trying to tell us was buying in. He, of course, heard it from a reliable source of his. So not only a raise at a lower price than the rampers were saying would happen, early, and for more money, but also diabolical production and commercial downgrades, timings pushed out for Casc 5 and Casc 4, and no legal case.

Yeah, anyone negative on our Charlatan CEO is lying, isn't invested, a trader, or a troll. The sad reality is that if you're not negative, you need to get your head checked. And that's all down to Calamity Baay. FACT!

ss, very funny. he also conned you btw. what's your holding and average again? and 15p in the next week, absolutely laughable. but if it does happen, i'll certainly be selling into it alongside all the pis buying at 11p and our new holders de-risking. seriously, what planet are you on? the share price might get to 13p with casc 5 success and central spud. but that will get sold into and we will stay around 11-12p for a while.

zero, look at the ****e you post. you talk of 'new holders' and 'traders when responding to people who have bought in from £1. and you still haven't found a single falsehood in the two long lists of failures over the past 6 months. the second list includes even lower production guidance on what had already been hugely cut this year. fund flow from ops at less than half your estimate, and yet you are fine with this. casc 5 pushed back, keeping in mind this was meant to be online and flowing 6 months ago. casc 4 pushed to next year, and not even a time frame was provided. this well is worth 2 x wells, and will likely flow at less than half the rate whenever it does flow. and it will be close to 1 year late. and they even dropped the legal proceedings on the raise debacle, so what does that say to you, zero? if there are falsehoods in those posts, then find one. you being a zero, means that you'll just continue with your drivel around 'not holders', 'traders', 'trolls'. if pb was even remotely competent at his job the share price would be 30p right now and we wouldn't even be talking about the list, which just got longer, of his failures in just 12 months.

stas, you are right that 20p is possible with casc 5, compressor and a couple of wells into central flowing at 10mcf per well. but that is a lot of things for a circus clown to get right. and he hasn't hit timings in god knows how long. so h2 next year at best.

i do love how johno still managed to find some excuse for the early raise. the argument given was casc 5, and central news would have been sold into, so better just to get on with it. i mean seriously? the same guy who was saying the raise would be done in his opinion in december, after these news items, at a higher share price, is now defending this most recent move. you were right the first time,johno, that casc 5 and central spudding would be material de-risking events for a company on its knees, and would have provided calamity baay with enough leverage to get the raise away at 12-13p. but he does it at 11p. why? the rns says it all - it's for central and the compressor. all that funds flow from ops that people were saying would pay for these things we discover isn't there. in the same way as we couldn't finish casc4 and casc 5 without the debenture.

all these things are in black and white. and yet ret@rds would rather ridicule someone stating facts than get rid of the lying charlatan who has lost pis £70m in 12 months. unbelievable.

I mean, it could happen. The question is when. If you 'Google' ChatGPT Atlas there's an article on the BBC that tells you it's a very long way from impacting Search or even Comparison. They have decided to monetise their product with a user subscription model rather than advertiser-funded, so I think it's unlikely to impact us for years. And it would require a huge user behaviour change.

Google, on the other hand, could be different. But for them to change the way their business model operates to negatively impact our Search and Comparison divisions will be a whole bigger and trickier move than the recent shift to RSOC. Again a couple of years away imo. It's why I'm quite happy for mgt to aggressively pay down debt. If major changes do occur in the next 2 years, and the business cannot adapt in a commercial manner, then being close to debt-free means you are back to being primarily a DIS business, where they can then prioritise BBs. Of course, I'm happy for them to do targeted, strategic BBs if they're confident there is nothing to worry about from ChatGPT and Google Search innovations, because they have a major investor exiting, or to restore some market confidence and kill the algo manipulation.

Please take the effort to send the email copy I provided. It's a paper trail of investor concerns and demands that show mgt has not been executing their fiduciary duties in responding to the significant decline in the share price created by an information vacuum of their making. It will help to hold them to account if:

1. There is material non-public information they have not disclosed.

2. They are staying silent whilst a lowball approach/offer is in the offing. As mentioned it would need the blessing of Kestrel, who are effectively a connected party through Max Royde, so it would be very rotten and I'd imagine could create some serious issues for mgt if the offer is below 85p and we are to hit guidance.

3. They couldn't care less about investors whose wealth has more than halved in the past 12 months, and would rather spend time jetting around attending and speaking at industry events, rather than speaking to their concerned shareholders who are currently in the dark.

All of the above are obviously not great, but the second scenario wouldn't be so bad if we can get an offer of 85p or more, which would be the equivalent of the previous offers of £1.25 if you assume $60-65m Adj EBITDA and $80m Net Debt at year-end. It may even get another offer on the table for a bid closer to £1.

Send the email and let's see what happens.

smasher, that's exactly what you are saying - that shareholders are to blame for believing the lies from baay. so tell me how investors looking at the company's assets, the trin deal, the central deal, and baay's guidance just 12 months ago were not researched? the issue is they believed baay was remotely competent and ethical, by having trin locked down and water-tight from a legal standpoint, and that he could close central, not do a bucket shop raise, have it fall over, then spring on the market that it's attached to the loan terms, but for an even bigger amount? let alone the most amateurish development mistakes you could even think of. how the f@ck could the most researched poster know that any ceo, let alone one on an $800k package, be that incompetent and deceitful? yet it's shareholders to blame. you're a ****** who managed to get out by blind luck and is now getting back in and only wanting to hear good things about his investment after 80% has been wiped from the company in 2 years and half of it given away to two investors at 11p and 16p. and we even got more baay special surprises today.

for those who sent the email, i'm going to engage the fca. i'll provide a step-by-step guide on how a complaint can be made and the content that can be shared. i find it completely unbelievable that he has executed his fiduciary duties, and i'm hoping the fca will make an example out of him, other directors, and their advisors to make a show of governance over the aim cesspit. this is the next step. there are others, but let's see where we get to with the fca.

baay should not be in charge of a listed company. the share price has been completely bombed out, and getting rid of him would be one of the best things that could happen for shareholders who have lost close to £100m in the past 2 years due to his complete lack of competence and ethics.

Thanks Lukee. Guys, please send the email content to those addresses over the weekend. It's easy to do. The date provided for a market statement and performance update is Wednesday next week.

let's play a game. who can name a single thing that calmaity baay has gotten right in the past year? seriously, anyone?

and before anyone grasps at a straw like 'casc 5', that would be false. it was up to 6 months late, depending on when you take baay's b@ll**** guidance, and it's still not flowing. it's also the only well they will have completed in an entire year of monumental f@ck ups. one well!

and yet people defend the man after he just diluted you by over 20% to pay for, wait for it, central and the compressor. the very things people on here were saying are covered by cash flow from ops that has been massively downgraded today as well.

it's so incredible that it's hard to believe everything that has happened. he had to raise cash, and he diluted us by even more than was required, because we couldn't pay for things people assumed were already covered. makes you wonder about all those claims of 4 x wells in central and a few more in casc next year. just to put things into perspective, calamity baay has paid in fees over the past year for 1.5 of those wells. and what do we have for it? and extra 50% more shares and absolutely zero trust in mgt.

stas mentioned that no one can believe a word that lyin paul says any more. and today, we discovered so much more deceit.

Nice one Lukee. Big difference between crypto that has made up value, and a business that is supposed to be making money and able to be valued. The problem is we have no idea how much money we are making, and therefore no way of being valued.

BTW, what's the IR email that everyone is using? I've got:

investor@teaminternet.com

Straight, no chance of 200 employees dumping their shares at this level. And most of them wouldn't have had shares anyway.

CRL, I didn't realise you were caught up here as well. God we know how to pick them. If there is manipulation going on to facilitate a takeover, and Kestrel is involved in any way, it would be very ugly for the directors. This is especially the case if folks have been sending emails covering the content I have shared. I know that AIM is full of sleaze, but TIG isn't your average AIM company, and it would come under a huge amount of scrutiny. Same with any other material information being withheld. I'm not sure Max Royde would be up for that kind of coverage, nor the directors. And if it's a takeover from a non-connected party is being facilitated, they would need to get past Kestrel and a few other major shareholders first, and good luck with that for anything less than 90p. Directors would also be called on their lack of action when the share price cratered inexplicably from 62p to 46p in 10 trading days.

Do me a favour and send the email provided. That way, there is a good 5-10 of us who will have the same paper trail if needed.

Guys, I'm unsure what else can be done. It's absolutely shocking, they are jetting around talking at industry events whilst the company valuation has cratered. And if there is no MNPI, and they want to blame it on algo trading, it's their responsibility to keep the market updated on performance to ensure such a thing doesn't occur. It's unbelievable that they are willing to sit and do nothing when shareholders are crying out for them to do their jobs and respond to the volatility / support the share price. It's not like we had jumped from £1 to £1.30 and dropped back again on nothing. We were already at a stupidly low valuation, something they have mentioned on multiple occasions, and have dropped over 25% further.

Send the email, and at least we have a paper trail running with TIG IR.

Cont...

MAR Disclosure Obligations and Material Non-Public Information (MNPI)

The magnitude of this price action, absent any company announcement, raises immediate and serious questions regarding the possible existence of Material Non-Public Information (MNPI).

We formally require confirmation that the Board is strictly adhering to its continuous disclosure obligations under the AIM Rules for Companies and the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR). Should a profit warning, a confirmed or potential takeover approach, or any other external factor that could have a material impact on the share price not be publicly communicated immediately, the Board would be in clear breach of its regulatory obligations.

Dismissal of Algorithmic Manipulation as Justification

We pre-emptively dismiss any explanation attributing this share price collapse solely to "algorithmic trading" or market noise. The Board cannot simply ignore a profound loss of capital based on market mechanics. It is your duty to take decisive, positive action, including prompt, detailed disclosure, to actively defend and support the company’s valuation against irrational market forces, thus upholding the interests of shareholders.

Demand for Action

We demand the following immediate and decisive actions:

1. A formal, public statement via Regulatory Information Service (RIS) no later than 9:00 AM on Wednesday, October 29th, 2025, addressing both the share price collapse and providing a concrete update on the operational performance and trajectory of the Search and Comparison divisions for the current half-year.

2. A clear explanation of the Board's strategy to address the current crisis of market confidence.

We trust that the Nominated Adviser has been fully engaged to enforce the Board’s adherence to its regulatory duties and ensure market integrity is immediately restored.

We await your prompt and substantive response.

Sincerely,

What was his comment, Lukee?

New email. This is invoking their fiduciary duties to address a share price decline in excess of 25% in 10 trading days. Confirm when emailed to IR.

Dear Members of the Board,

I am writing to you today as a deeply concerned shareholder to issue a formal and urgent demand for an immediate public explanation regarding the catastrophic decline of more than 25% in the Team Internet Group share price over the past ten trading days alone. This significant and sustained erosion of shareholder wealth is indicative of a profound crisis in market confidence.

Invocation of Fiduciary Duties and Duty of Care:

As Directors, you owe the company and its shareholders a paramount Fiduciary Duty, which includes:

- The Duty to Promote the Success of the Company (Section 172 of the Companies Act 2006).

- The Duty to Exercise Reasonable Care, Skill, and Diligence (Section 174 of the Companies Act 2006).

The current lack of substantive, proactive communication in the face of this severe volatility is, in our view, a failure to adhere to these duties, particularly the duty to exercise the diligence required to preserve and support company value and shareholder wealth. Continued silence amounts to a passive dereliction of duty during a period that demands decisive action and transparent stewardship.

Failure of Operational Transparency and Investor Confidence:

This decline is exacerbated by the Board’s recent failure to maintain adequate operational transparency, which contravenes the spirit of proper investor relations and renders the company uninvestable for many.

We note that since the loose guidance provided in March, which already represented a significant downgrade from prior-year performance, the market has received only a single performance update via the H1 results. For a company where the core Search division is in transition/turnaround and the Comparison division is scaling, this minimal level of disclosure is wholly unacceptable.

Investors and the market currently have literally no idea how TIG is performing against internal forecasts, creating a massive information vacuum. It is the Board's fiduciary duty to provide a level of operational insight that allows the market to rationally assess value, especially when the underlying business segments are undergoing strategic transformation. The current vacuum ensures the lowest possible valuation.

Cont...

15mmcf I believe is yours, Johno. And you said yesterday that Lyin Paul confirmed the forecast flow rate wouldn't change for Casc 4.

But is that all you can offer with each post, finding one little thing to make a point amongst an extensive list of failings? And half the time you use Baay's words to back up the little points you make.

Quite something that you can be down by over £350k and still defend the man. Perhaps you should try getting him removed to get your money back. Rather than trying to push up the share price whilst Baay destroys it. All the L2's, petty and quite remarkable defences, won't change the fact Calamity Baay just raised more money, at almost half the original price, to cover a funding gap to a loan covenant that he didn't disclose to the market. And, that he just downgraded production guidance, from an already massively downgraded number, and commercial guidance, from an already downgraded number, and Casc 5 is delayed, Casc 4 he's trying to hide under the rug, and our legal case against Oak and the bucket shop has been pulled, no doubt because of a TXP oversight. All this with $millions in fees.

Oh, and then there's the TRIN fiasco that started the decline from a sp level more than 3x the current just 1 year ago. And again over a $million in fees.

You're not going to get your money back in this way, Johnno. Get rid of Baay, and that will be more effective at pushing the sp than a Central well that we need to pray will be ok. He gets $800k in salary, share awards, and probably some other freeloader stuff. He hasn't got a single thing right this year. Not one. So why bother with the petty points and defences, when the sp is 11p.

That's it Zero, nothing. You've got your opinion based on 'your experience'. And what experience would that be oh wise one whose mastery of English is second to none? The only experience you have with TXP is years of being wrong about everything. Or would you like to give us just one projection that you got right recently? Maybe get together with SirTradesALot and try to find one between you.

120k shares! wow! huge trade! wait a minute, how many shares have just been issued again?

zero, are you going to join sirtradesalot and tell us when 'she's gonna blow'? weren't we meant to have lift-off with this raise sirtradesalot?

here's a thought, once the newly issued shares land, don't be surprised if the sp drops below the raise price. contrary to sirtradesalot's !diotic projections, this happens quite often. and given the complete lack of liquidity here, and new pis hoovering up 11p shares, it's going to take a long time before we breach even 13p and hold it for more than 2 weeks. a long time means until the end of january, providing they can actually drill a central well to forecast.

so let's join together and pray that our late casc 5 well, coming online sometime in november now, hits the forecast flow-rates. and they are capable of actually finishing a non-f@cked up well in central by the end of january. and they find gas where shell didn't bother drilling with all their spare capacity and high fixed costs. and casc 4 hits 15mmcf as per lyin paul's comms with johnno (*cough* b@ll****) whenever it comes online in 2026.

in calamity baay we trust.

Zero, you still haven't come up with a single mistruth, have you? I gave you a list yesterday, all you had was an opinion on how long it takes to close a straightforward deal, which Calamity Baay still f@cked up.

And what about today - have you got anything that show a mistruth or inaccuracy on the massive raise at 11p, for more than the funding gap, over 2 months early (so contrary to what Baay was saying, no other options were being pursued), for development costs supposedly already budgeted for, downgraded production guidance (again), downgraded commercial guidance (again), Casc 5 pushed back, Casc 4 not even a month provided, legal proceedings dropped, you got anything to say about this? Anything inaccurate Zero?

C'mon, show us all that you're not a complete joke and find something to back up your pidgin English posts.

As for the FCA, that's the obvious next move after this morning's raise to have him held to account for such a litany of investor disclosure failings alone.

SS, don't excuse CEO's deliberate withholding and omission of material information, as 'it happens on AIM'. You're right that the FCA is useless, but perhaps they will see this as a slam dunk to show some teeth against what happens on AIM.

no i'm calling sm out as a trader, can you not read? the same thing that every other person was doing this morning with his 'this flys (sic)' and l2 ****e.

unfortunately, because you only read 'he's ramping, therefore i like what he's saying', you cannot see what any clear-eyed investor can. and then sm calling me out as having multiple accounts when getting rumbled pretty much sums up his little conjob. sniff of good news and he's on the discord human centipede, advfn, and here. on the other board, they tell him to f@ck off with his mindless b@ll**** constantly. you can read the same cr@p on panr, tek, he1 etc.

yeah, but he's saying something +ve about our 65% losses in the past year, downgraded production and commercials (twice), basic f@ck ups on production, and the deliberate omission of material information from our ceo that has caused the mess, so he's not so bad eh? we couldn't even pay for central and the compressor, so the funding wasn't just in the loan covenant, it was necessary. it's why the funding gap wasn't removed. but lyinpaul couldn't come clean on our further downgraded production and commercial guidance until we secured the fire sale of 20% of our company, and for even more than was needed.

johno claiming 'let's see who's right' on whether they bring a single well online this year in november. well you'd hope so, wouldn't you, because what was the original date again? how many wells were they meant to drill this year? and now you're playing let's see who's right with stas on the whole month of november.

you've been right about as often as sirconjob. raise was going to be in december after the sp jumps on casc 5, central spud, and casc 4, wasn't it? lyinpaul was still talking about other funding options just a few days ago with you, was he not? guidance was not going to change, was it not? and lyin paul said he wouldn't change guidance on casc 4 production, which is about the only thing you can say 'let's see who's right'. and you'll be wrong on that as well, whenever it comes online 'next year'.

seriously, go and work in pr for them. you and john27 spin calamity baay's lies and b@ll**** whilst coming across as credible, better than anyone. you ask folks to excuse the most basic f@ck ups like wrong drilling mud, and re-entering the same f@cked well, as 'learnings', and 'it least he owned it'. poor calamity baay was let down by a last-minute bucket shop raise to close a 'transformational' asset that fell in his lap. what about the withholding of material information on the raise falling over, and on it being attached to the loan terms? and the deliberate avoidance of notifying the market in multiple rnss over two months, then dropping it on the market. we now know they're not pursuing oak and portillion, so what does that tell you mr right?

you have as much credibility for being 'right' on things as lyin paul has for being a competent ceo.

Jesus, no I only looked at the 11p raise section and what the proceeds were for.

Incredible, the useless, lying pr@t cannot even reach the massive downgrade to production for the year, and sticks it right at the bottom of the raise RNS. He announces Casc 5 online in November. And Casc 4 next year. Can someone remind me how many wells he guided for this year? And legal proceeding dropped, confirming he f@cked up.

Johno, are you and John27 on TXP's payroll? Seriously, you should apply for a job in PR there. You have spun the most ridiculous stories and excuses for every f@ck-up, misdirection and lie that Lyin Baay has mentioned to you. You talked about a raise in December after Casc 5 and Central spud, because you believed the sp would be significantly higher. And now you are spinning a different story for Baay?

SS, have you had a brain trauma again? Tell me about the twisting of truths in my post yesterday - the True / False game. You, like the other h@lfwits were talking about Casc 5, Casc 4 and Central spud re-rating the share price. So what do you make of Casc 5 November, Casc 4 no date next year, and Central no doubt late as well? And you talk about 'me, me' types? And asking would I be ranting if I was making money? Well of course I wouldn't you gold-plated t!t. But for any of us to make money, it would have relied on Baay not only delivering on the most basic of development plans. But not f@cking a straightforward fundraise, and then omitting and deliberately withholding material information about the fundraise being part of the loan terms.

And then you have traders like SirConjob saying 'this flys (sic) in my opinion'.

Zero, calling a buyout at 30-80p.

dbh calling a buyout at 60p next year.

Smasher telling posters they aren't researched well enough, and that's why they have lost 80% of their money to Lyin Paul in 24 months. Smasher, the research on the assets, production guidance, Central, and the number of wells to be drilled, is why everyone bought in. Or are you saying investors should have known that Baay is the most incompetent and deceitful CEO on AIM, and therefore it's their fault for believing him? You're such a winner getting out with your shirt and buying back in. Well done.

And last but not least - 'look forward and not sp performance of 90%/80%/65% losses over the past 5/2/1 years. Same imbeciles saying the same thing, but calling deramper, trader, not invested, on anyone pointing out failures.

I've told you what will happen. The sp will be range bound between 10.5-12.5p for a long time. SirConjob will be here pumping it constantly and talking about how many shares he is buying, and then selling into it alongside others. Johno and John27 will talk about their special relationship with Lyin Paul and relaying his messages down the Discord human centipede. And it will all go on.

as for the biggest b@ll****artist pi here, sm. you appear on a sniff of good news and a few buys to get things started, and then the deluge of stating the most ridiculous share price targets, casc 5 or some other bull**** claim will be transformational, 'l2 is going crazy' on your few buys, and then you disappear after the 10% pump to do it all on other news driven, bombed out micro-caps, like he1, panr and tek. you've even admitted to trading at the edges, and yet you make pathetic accusations of 'deramper to lower your average', 'you're not invested', or that posters are the same person.

you are either the most ignorant poster on here who never gets a single claim right, or you're a conjob just like baay. all those behaviours have been on display here for a while now sm. we've all seen it, just the h@lfwits believe your b@ll**** because they want to live in a happy, clappy, echo chamber of baay's making.

answer my last post and provide reasons for the following:

- why has baay raised before casc 5 & 4 would give us 'lift off'?

- why for more money than the funding gap required?

- why are the funds now directed at development when everyone was led to believe they would be covered by cashflow?

- why more than 2 months before the funding gap deadline, when he stated so many other options were being pursued?

also, you said raise + casc 5 = the high teens. with + central = 20-25p. you are going to be reminded of these b@ll**** statements daily sirrampsalot.