Member Info for Fukurokuju79

If they prove the hypothesis then I won't put my price expectations on here for fear of being called crazy.
Saw the same chance I'm ARB at 3-5p as I did when I bought in here at 3p.
Sadly it's all in pension and not available for many years but I'd take it.

I hope they hit on these drills but I think it's only a matter of time even if they don't.

Atb though
Keeping it all crossed

Helx. Why on earth do you comment here. Don't say you're invested as if you are you're more a fool then you think we are.
At least we have a positive mood term outlook on the stock. I waited to buy in at around 2-2.2p.
You prob bought in on the 30p plus spike and expect us to take nothing of your constant dribble.
The lesson in investing is on you. Don't do a Helx.

I suggest that this now becomes a lesson, to all.
DONT DO A HELX.

If i worst happens I lose a little. Or average down ( I only bought a third of intended position). Or I make a load.
It's not rocket science. You need to apply a little more strategy and not follow the herd at the top.

Now do the honourable thing and move on already. At what point do you determine you've made your point? When it DM goes under and you lose what you have left ( if you ever bought).

Just a little odd tbh

Atb to you though. No skin off my nose

I agree

Ella I can understand your analogy. And no I shouldn't think the bank (arcm) would let the policy holder do that. They would engage with them but on the flip side would the bank or policy holder release this news to the buying market before it had a definitive outcome, or would it conclude those discussions or processes.

I get your point about Comms but you need to let things run a little. Give them a chance they've got plenty on ATM I'm sure.

Atb

Just have to put the drill in and see. As you say, it can be up to 70m of Kalahari sands so is what it is.

They'll do there best I'm sure but it's not exact and unpredictable. Best to check into the tw!tter feed and see how theyg are going.

Once they've drilled in they may release an RNS if they are excited by what they see, and may also release results of the XRF they do on site. That said, BT did say he wasn't decided yet, as he prefers to have it all confirmed. He is a bit of a paradox in that he shares more than most companies do of exploration data, but equally he rather favours having validated it as much as possible first. Which is a good thing I suppose.

Atb
Atb

Well they'll do what they do I suppose can't change that. They've probably been selling since 14th/15th.

At least it adds to RMM coffers by the tune of $2 million CAD or £1.1 million ish sterling. Every little helps.

Plus they've not got any further warrants so it's dealt with.

All in good time.
Atb

Not having done DD yet won't matter imo. Whilst AA are ahead having done their DD, that would just speed up the execution of finalising any commercial transaction.
It would not preclude other majors who want the asset, from making a higher and more competitive bid. It'll just mean that the ly will caveat that said offer is subject to the successful completion of due diligence.

Atb

Very useful thanks Keith. Just a case of waiting the drill and and results in time.

Atb

Thanks Keith..

I think he (Ben) got one of the independent consultants to prepare the table as an indicative (and maybe quick) tool to help explain the importance of the readings to standard PIs/ for his video announcements.

Certainly not bullet proof , just generally to help give PIs a better gauge on the meaning and relative meaning to the results they've found.

I'm not a geologist, but as you've mentioned graphite a couple times, would it be a likely element under the KSZ?

Also do you have a view on the comment made by icbb I've included below....

>>What gives me confidence here with KAV is the location of the conductors in the bottom of the gabbro keel. I think that is essential and distinguishes KAV from from other explorers with high conductivity targets<<

Atb

Also re your point .…

>>KAV is very unusual for its detailed communications.<<

I'd agree. I suspect it's because they want people to take the 'potential' at the KSZ seriously as we know it was previously drilled unsuccessfully and it's not your stereotypical prospective area with the circa 70m of Kalahari sands on top of what you'd normally use to help identify targets and prospectivity/drill targets etc.

On this basis I think Kav have made a decision after BT came onboard to share their new approaches, methods, and exploration at a deeper level than normal. Ben T has clearly said nothings for sure though until the drill has been in the ground.

Can't say it's not exciting to find out. Albeit a little nerve wracking
Atb

Keith,

Can you recall the company / project / location and what they found that had initially caused the TDEM that gave such a high reading?

BT has said it's never certain until the drill, but they've ruled out a number of possible false positives and I'd be interested to know more detail...to see how that compares

Regards

Nice RNS....

Ooooh so it's......

https://youtu.be/9jK-NcRmVcw

Yeah. Suppose they want to keep some powder dry.
Get this drill done and see what's in the table before or after.

Yeah, it's 18 holes 500m a piece that's my recollection of the call.

P S. That last message came across wrong. Not saying you're playing games. Just saying you seem to be really focused on the negative these days, looking for issues in your research, rather than being balanced when researching. Especially if invested. Fair enough I suppose, each to own.

Ella the drill was also delayed. I said it on here prior to the RNS. I hope you don't end up turning the same on KAV. You seem to show enthusiasm and good research to start , then just focus on what any possible negative you can unearth.
Seems a bit tactical / intended to me.

@Ella

Regarding your comment
>>Great to see everyone agreeing that we actually need to drill to confirm the presence of any copper<<

Maybe a little pedantic of me here but I'm certainly not saying we need to drill to 'confirm the presence' of copper. We already know it's everywhere based on exploration.
What I'm looking confirmation for on drill is the presence of massive bodies of high grade, tier one copper.

Atb

Thanks SeizNav.
Only one way to find out if they've chosen the right targets.......

Ta

You're really pleasant NorEsco. If tis, and every other board, is nonsense you're welcome to not visit, read or participate (I use that term loosely given your 'participation' so far).

Or you can continue to spend your time visiting, reading and then moaning about how pointless it is. As that makes much more sense.

Atb