Member Info for Fukurokuju79

Freshness, succession, optics - especially given recent news. Would be my view.

What's occurring with this case then? Was it held up again ad surely its not still in court 🤔

Assume the case proceeded and an RNS will be released....you heard anything Fulmar?

Cheers seis

I feel I've missed something n the bots side of things. When was a sale announced, maybe my memory has failed (highly likely). I thought the last was the results show it's likely to be an extension of the neighbours mine and that we have had interest etc.

Maybe I've forgotten something I heard in an investor call. Anyone able to elaborate?

Thanks

They should have asked you butowski....as clearly with your advanced knowledge, attention to detail and all coupled with your words per minute output, you could have had it wrapped up in about 24hours.

It's the upcoming drill campaign that's the key. Last one was less targeted than this will be, and as they go through each year.

I'm not expecting any assays to say anything earth shattering personally. I'm certainly not in a rush for them. I just don't think they will be what investors are waiting for. The next bunch perhaps I'll be more keen to hear about.

Trek was just a message direct copy below, not my words...

'Y’all need to chill TFO.

By 4/25 latest everything will be in place for $PXCLY.

Bond will be subscribed to ($75m+) and sulphide project beginning. Serious upside to combining Sulphides with Oxides.

Too many panicking and not seeing the real value. Pres Trump gonna make u rich.'

Same account said early March it'll all be sorted in 2/3 weeks or similar and that it'll be with green initiatives/funds to replace existing arrangement.

All in all no validation of statements or wider context or any history to give any weight to the above.

In reality I do agree with the sentiment about the macro environment with the states and critical metals on home soil. Obviously also believe pxc should be able to secure something in this environment (if ever there was a time to be able to). However clearly it the company we need to hear from, not an x rando.

Atb

Stop all this. I can't keep up with the posts and company announcements here 🤣

Connaught, equitable life, arch cru, madoff, bear sterns, Lehmann, Woodbridge...

Obviously the UK ones are covered by the FSCS.

However, you're making a pointless comparison. They are clearly not in the same category.

Move on and go seek those investment funds if that's what you prefer. That's no issue if you want a safer bet but even funds have different risk profiles. If you think people here don't understand the risks, that's on them. If anyone thinks funds are riskier than a direct investment in a single exploration miner then they shouldn't be here. You're making a very strange argument that's pointless, and frankly obvious.

I assume the collective we who are invested in pxc are aware of its volatility and risks. We take those risks for greater potential rewards. You can have 9 out of 10 risky stocks go belly up and make huge returns if correctly allocated. It's apples and oranges.

Perhaps best to let us be adults and make our own choices and teach your investment 101 to newbies.

Atb

There are a million ways to manage risk. There are a million different ways to invest, and vehicles to invest in. People can make money in them all. People can lose money in them all. They all have differing levels of risks. They can be held for different time periods. The investment world is bountiful and has so so many permutations you could discuss this forever changing the angle every time.

The bottom line is people should invest fully aware of the risks, with a strategy that suits them.

Is pxc more risky than most etfs, or most companies on the ftse is not really a question that needs an answer. It's obvious.

Honestly for many (and probably most) and certainly for someone like old smokey, a well balanced basket of collective investments, is probably the best option.

Let someone else do it for you. Drip feed it on the monthly to blend the average over time and you'll be fine.

Atb

All the best to you.

Have a good day

There are many large caps that dont make a profit. There are also many who have fallen. Exploration companies, by nature, and not producers and their assumed value isn't measured by profit.

Comparing an exploration company with Tesco or am ETF or another collective investment is like comparing an apple with an orange, just because they are both fruits.

While I respect others opinions and right to have different views and risk appetites. I'm not likely to go onto the Tesco share chat to belittle their freedom to choose.

If pxc, and microcaps, aren't of interest to you I'd recommend spending your life on something you enjoy, somewhere you consider more worthwhile.

Atb

Hopesmoke - clearly putting money on any stock is a gamble. Doesn't matter if its a blue chip or an exploration company. Essentially both can go down as well as up. It's just the risk vs reward that is the differential.

If we decide we are happy to place our money in pxc, whatever our reasons or level or research I suppose that's our own perogative.

I'll happily take a rise on sentiment. The whole market is sentiment and rarely based on rationality.

Lol

Cant be bothered to decipher the auto corrects. New phone. It needs to learn my words (and I need to learn to check).

Indeed. Just need Mr Market to catch up/on.

Frustrating really given where we are now

Nice RNS today and now to come so have to see what cm moves the sentiment. Could be a great stock in terms of gains, when/if the it starts moving.

I'm not anticipating significant results. Ultimately AA have only just (barely) got started on their commitments. My expectations of the drilling so far isn't about economic grades etc but about proving their theories and the general geology etc. They are simply a starter to know where to focus the money and time they will have to spend in the coming campaigns.

We're missing most the puzzle, that's the problem 😂

I'm not saying it isnt unusual, and we don't know the size or details of the swap, but logic would suggest as SH says it wouldn't be established for peanuts.

Re UBS being unhedged, how do we know they aren't? Clearly the market price suggests they haven't hedged by buying actual stock, at this stage, and certainly less likely if the swap is as assumed (of reasonable size to establish the swap in the first place). They could have hedged with a short or other derivative.

I agree it's unusual and intriguing etc. Ultimately though without full context there are too many factors to determine a meaningfully accurate hypothesis IMO.

Hopefully the news continues in 2025. Ultimately that's what will eventually bring the buyers, and momentum, hopefully!! Certainly should be a heck of a lot of drilling and they will have learnt a lot from initial phase. Plus we have bots .

I'm anticipating the approval of the licence will give AA the confidence to really open the purse strings, which they'll have to start to do given the capex commitments in the JV deal.

Gla