Member Info for feelinlucky

all limbs ok presently as hubby versed on heath and safety and now has to give a week's notice before making a move........need to gather together some teacake crumbs.........maybe HUR, so ssshhhhhhh! ;-)))

update.....and today IOG has made a move on DELT!

RBD downgraded HUR from 25p target and 'outperform' to 1p target and 'underperform'.......some kind of takeover move looks imminent (due to previous time spent together in AEX, appologies to Mouse especially for use of word 'imminent' ;-)) )

they have not bought the management's recent 'downgrade' argument. If they are right then HUR is being deliberately held down. Incidentally, M&A activity has already begun elsewhere....IOG making a move on DELT (also being held down deliberately) ...in a move on HUR AAOG may also pay down the corporate bonds with AAOG's cash facility instantly adding value......

Au Contraire my little whiskered friend!....yes HUR have effectively written off the fractured basement story, but they now know there's a serious amount of oil in the sandstone flanks of high quality that 'spill over' to charge the fractured basement. They are getting lazy regards drilling new wells in the Brexit/Covid/poor offshore situation..... but they have parcelled up their acreage into two sections (by dropping the middle licence section they would have had a drilling obligation on) and in so doing made two saleable oil saturated sandstone plays - which they will want to flog off as soon as possible

I'm not in HUR at the moment but was so have kept an eye on it since.....don't fret I'm not recommending it. I do think, having read this bb, that your management are more interested in 'corporate activity' than geology and they look like they know what they're doing. I believe you'll be ok here with very interesting months ahead

Better than Devon!.......had a thought if HUR may be the target acquisition, would same MCAP (going by your amount of draw-down facility potentially to be used) and de-staffing in Aberdeen, looking like assets about to be sold off.....may be next to become a cash shell after an AAOG take over? .........just theorising

just sharing a tip for West Newton drill if anyone wants in on that - go for RBD (fewer shares in issue), not UJO ( infested with insider dealing crooks!) ..........I like the peeps here and wish you all well

I'm following the 'Weald Oilers' tweetings for rig arrival and to see if the swampies will glue themselves to anything :-))

I recently tipped UJO for the West Newton drill so I thought to update you that I now prefer RBD (Reabold) for WN... as fewer shares issued and because UJO is unfortunately infested with insider dealing crooks (and also literal crooks working with them including an ex- armed bank robber!) and David Bramhill's name linked to Nighthawk Energy as a beneficiary of the winding up but company name strangely still linked to him. I have learned the valuable lesson to research directors!..........Main drilling rig about to arrive on site West Newton and good 'in' price for RBD All the best FL

not me, have moved to another bb

what if DB's rns was deliberately mis-worded? no one understands the fumbled message - whether he was confirming a placing had been leaked and that there was in fact one, or whether there was no placing.....and yet it could be argued he has told the market (however badly) that there could be one (which isn't saying anything).......was this an act of crookedness calculated at giving himself an 'out' should facts re. the leak come to light? (which he can then deny either way!) and if he failed to get takers for a raise there's another 'out' in denying there even was one!!!!?

That depends on the photo they appear in - it's always been Ant on the left and Dec on the right :-))

I hope to.......just as long as 'Ant and Dek' behave themselves ;-))

about him indeed......AND too many shysters standing up for him too who seem to be his best mate in the world yet strangely 'have NO IDEA what the raise is for'....they probably DO which makes what he's saying so insulting especially to Heid who has done a good job rooting out the bullcr@p... and this ill-timed raise is probably for cash to 'rest' in a highly probable bitcoin/similar account (most likely talked into by the PR floosy who's going a bit mental on twitter about it and gold, and how real currencies will be worthless imminently! no kidding) ....to tide him over Brexit/Covid/the Christmas holiday season? those are my suspicions and for that reason I'm out of UJO now!

I find many of your sharp observations refreshing and informative....and it keeps arrogant sorts on their toes! keep it up girl!

can he do the next one for 'share price will turnip'?

happy to see lively debate!...the more ideas and discussion the better! .....however it bugs me to see an overdone drop in sp when they aren't surely going for that big a raise....and we are sat here waiting to find out what's really going on. If raises were restricted to certain dates we could be happily trading today and false rumours of placings would not be possible....the only matters for speculation would be 'if' and 'for what'...as the 'cash for keeping lights on' and 'how low will it go' would be less pertinent.....as will 'insider trading'... just a suggestion, more opinions welcome

Specific to our company we should propose a 'Shareholder's Charter' for conduct of raises in future, a code the company must voluntarily agree to abide by. I think there should be set times in the year (on set dates and no others) that the company can raise (if it needs to) a strictly limited amount, which will be so small as to not impact the sp in an significant way, yet can provide a steady flow of cash for the company's needs, and the dates can pass without a dilution taking place if the cash earnings from production are adequate as agreed by consensus......would make for less of a rodeo?

strictly limit quantity of shares for each individual shareholder in raise or ban directors from participation in the raise?