AHL & Man's SP7 Jul 2014 10:09
Hi jackd, thanks for the mention.
First and most important, if your issues are able to be, hope they are improved speedily. If not then hope they can be overcome and you are able to move on.
Secondly, I believe the blip on Friday afternoon was triggered by a combination of a premeditated conspiracy by some illicit shorters, trying to recoup some of their losses, that was accommodated by mm's trying to get pi's to panic sell. (I had discussed with Bigel earlier on Friday that I suspected something like it might happen). I can see no other reason at all, especially as AHL had put on another 1.1 to rise to 1.2321, highest it's been for well over a year and when the share price rose to the 1.20's. Note!!! the shorting happened just before the AL results were made public). Without that shorting and manipulating, Man's price, in all logical reasoning, should have risen to around £1.20 and, as dduck posts, may have gone further up the 1.20's today.. Therefore, I feel we are being cheated. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
After previous discussions with you I am not against shorting, (as allowed in the rules). But I feel strongly, that, If done by company insiders then it can be nothing short of commercial/ industrial sabotage, (if not insider dealing). If done by others it can be a form of financial bullying by financial cowards. However, such wicked variations used by some just to feather their nests at the expence of many looks like it is going to get a big airing in public. Even lawmakers (MP's), are taking notice. Perhaps the law keepers (LSM) will be shamed into doing so and the illicit predators will not be so arrogant. In addition it is hoped that those lending shares, along with marketmakers, really ought to be made to share responsibility if their actions result in abuse of the rules. My opinion but seems to be shared by many.