Member Info for EricDraven

Best of luck with your latest buys lads. Let's see what happens this year. Lol.

Time for bed, you little hell cats. Best wishes.

Lol. Ramper number 2, I can imagine you singing along with that one. Fully sozzled. Happy New Year. Morny morn. x

Wow. Not good reading that. Anyway, best wishes matey and I hope we nail some good news here before the need to sign up for cryogenic freezing. Lol. Cheers Troaj.

Wishing one and all a healthy, happy and prosperous New Year. Posting now because I may be asleep by midnight, being an old git. Lol. Best regards.

Lol. I can imagine it Aug. A rainbow coloured rest home bus pulling into Kosovo. EU flags aplenty. Slight whiff of ammonia and formaldehyde emanating from the open windows. Elvis is doin' the drivin''. Let the drills turn and the money burn. And the mafia can shove off! Best wishes to you.

I'll monitor that one Troaj, but BEM is my only investment, or at least the only one currently trading on a platform, following BMR's delisting from AIM, and I won't be investing anywhere again, following eight years of absolute torture. Best regards.

Yes Bob, it's a rib tickler special. We are currently waiting for a not yet formed newbie Government to give us a decision. Lol. The interim Government, formerly the proper Government, having proven to be as ineffective for us as if there wasn't any Government in place at all. Which is what we've got now. Lol. Happy New Year!

Cheers Sooz.

This is fookin' stroke-inducing mayhem. Howl.

Hi Andy. Clearly, the MI is leaving it for the Government to decide. The MI, however, cannot backtrack on its statement regarding our EIA being in keeping with the Norra ruling. As Aug points out, there have been no further material happenings since then, no additional rulings made elsewhere, which we'd also have to unfairly ingest, lol, and it has also been established that there are to apparently be no indirect effects on the Kallak area from our proposed "green" mining operation. The MI then, has no grounds to not support our application, and, moreover, it is merely looking now to the Government for the Government itself to make a decision (perhaps via the MI), because the MI did not deem that it could force an opinion from the CAB. The recent statement in Swedish, to which you refer, is, in my opinion, procedural jargon. The MI to me is indicating that the onus is on the Government to decide. The MI will probably then be directed as to said decision and channel the decision accordingly. We must remember that the MI is an arm of the Government. All in my humble.

Yes, it was me who posted the Xpediator video. Only to show the strain in Borrelli's face, as he tries, but of course fails to come across as all responsible and genuine. Lol.

He'll soon be an empty husk. Repeated wrongdoing of others, without conscience, takes its toll eventually. Slip-ups on the cards.

That is when the Sweeney will have you by the plums.

All allegedly, in my humble.

Viva shareholders!

Andy is saying that the MI hasn't given us a "Yes" or a "No", which is true, but the Norra Karr statement in terms of our application, as Aug mentions, points to the MI's satisfaction with our EIA. So the MI is not in any way sitting on the fence of uncertainty. It is supporting what BEM has submitted in line with the ruling. A ruling that shouldn't really have had anything to do with us anyway. Norra is a million zillion miles away and a totally different beastie. Lol. That's how I see it all anyway. The MI is supporting our application, based on what we've submitted v criteria, rules and rulings. Zzzzz. Night. x

Aug and you are correct I believe. Andy is wrong on this. The last bout of passing the parcel was because the MI did not feel it had the power to force the CAB into giving an opinion, hence why the Government copped for it again. Had the MI objected to the granting of a Concession, it would have been curtains by now. I'm sure the CAB would have agreed to a "No" from the MI, but it's something that we've never had.

Amazing that. The compiler mustn't read our posts. Lol.

I expect you to be top ramper next year. Good luck with your latest buy.

Agree with that, and we have to believe that later won't mean too late Pocko. I don't feel it is apt for Kurt to continue to sit tight and watch this post-election debacle unfold, all the while at our expense. It'll be going on for a year soon, since all final comments were submitted in respect of our application. Hmm.

Well fair enough Sooz, but we've only had a transitional set-up since September. You know what I'm getting at. Good luck to us.

Double post. Sorry. Having problems with LSE, losing my posts mid-type etc.

Fair enough Vig and good points. Well said. Yes, for someone with a chaotic trail of crap in his wake, undoubtedly so, and the chap not at all shy of operating at times, it seems, close to the very boundary edge of, let's say, any published rules in existence, lol, I can see why you fancy that he wouldn't submit your letters to the Old Bill.

Why shine a spotlight on potentially incriminating evidence? Particularly if one is an ageing artful dodger, already on life support, and blowing out of one's lower orifice.

Allegedly, of course.

I hope some good comes from your determined efforts, though obviously, for shareholders only.

Best wishes.