RE: Eric14 Jan 2019 15:51
Good points. Had we known prior, the possibility of having to shell out such an amount to Blue Square, then I would suggest there should have needed to be a more detailed explanation of the service to be provided. We still don't officially know exactly what BS did, to assist in retrieval of the licence. Neither do we know why the licence hasn't been suspended again, due to JLP's lack of progress at Kabwe.
Nothing appears to have favoured BMR shareholders really though, and we must remember that ZEMA approved the processing of lead and zinc using our own proprietory methods. Why were these methods then later deemed almost immediately unviable by the JLP team? Price of acid, yes, but I can't help but feel that Jeremy got the rough end of the stick. He seems to have been unfairly steamrollered out of the picture.
I'm all for a larger plant, but we can no longer look forward to a main share of any future profits. Far from it. I'm not sure why JLP haven't yet cracked on, as they were supposed to. It makes their percentage of profits look even more false. I'm sure the JLP holders aren't too chuffed either with the lack of progress on this project.
Why are the licence rules severe for BMR, yet seemingly not so for JLP?
Many ponderings 3card, and it's frustrating not knowing the answers. It would be appropriate though, considering our reduced profit margin due to the derisory deal struck by Alex while we were off AIM, to have an indication of just when we'll be likely to see the royalty. What is JLP waiting for? Is it looking to adapt a former plant?
We looked at the old Sable plant and deemed it unsatisfactory to acquire and utilise, so if JLP is able to use an existing plant, rather than build a brand new one, that will be another kick in the teeth for us BMR holders. Lol.
Let's see what happens.
All the best.