Member Info for doze

Agreed CO, glad you are up for comment. AVCT should make loads of sales internationally anyway if AffiDX is validated and does the job.

That is the school start has jumped the gun of our sovereign test and ideally the whole population as an education and data gathering exercise should only be allowed out after a negative sovereign test because current test are no good.

Nothing has worked and huge costs incurred. T&T is a waste of money if our test works. Vaccines in conjunction with my suggested solution below is simple and enforceable even though not foolproof it would be the only solution.
Conclusions and recommendations
https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5801/cmselect/cmpubacc/932/93205.htm
How can these be properly discussed without the sovereign test development using affimers. Why has it been a secret?
The last four bullet points are answered with;
(Assume AffiDX is a huge success in its sovereign form)
While outbreaks still occur the localised area as notified will be under lockdown except where individuals have a negative sovereign test and this will be written into law with individuals responsible for evidence of test taken.
Lift of lockdown will occur when enough sovereign LFTs are available and allow you circulate after a negative test.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-56352684
https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5801/cmselect/cmpubacc/932/93203.htm
https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/127/public-accounts-committee/news/150988/unimaginable-cost-of-test-trace-failed-to-deliver-central-promise-of-averting-another-lockdown/

https://www.londonstockexchange.com/help/whats-issuer-profile-overview#what-is-trades-table-

LRGS' ie larger than market size (5000)- deferred report--Market Makers are allowed to delay publication of trades larger than market size which I suppose they take every advantage of allowing the dip at 15.15

A lot of fuzzy ticks for your post icecool- the thread is about low prevalence edict to say PCR booted into touch and I would say has never had any relevance in the control of Rrate and that is why the lockdowns were necessary.

Government document thread quercus @ 12.49 but well spotted anyway.

gold standard

The document is a bit beyond me but reckon the boffins have come round to my way and are dislodging PCR as golld standard for the purpose of LFT efficacy- what took them so long?

This licence is the third non-therapeutics agreement signed (New England Biolabs – life science research applications in 2018 and Astrea Bioprocessing in 2020)-FinnCap

you did i by mistake?

Isn't that the way with a lot of bio deals gkb. If we can drive a wedge with affimers the snowball should start rolling and eoy results will be instructive for you.

https://www.londonstockexchange.com/news-article/AVCT/diagnostic-licensing-deal-with-biokit/14892200

CO thanks for putting me right, I think most invested here believe affimers and spike protein detection to be effective. Lets hope they don't fail in the fight against covid like N protein antigen testing and rna PCR has done. No argument over their failure we just wait for affimers to have a go without those failures interfering with their +ve and -ve results . The proof will be in the data as the professionals are all over the place in disarray with arguments. Affimers deserve an equal shot at it as the rest after all AS has waited long enough in the shade and AVCT has to have the spotlight on it to prove up affimers but fairly. We might have a good future in those circumstances.

sleepydave, I don't think there would be so much confusion had AffiDX been in use now but the Innova test has more false positives. The government have not been transparent enough about our LFT/moonshot and of course putting rules in place for ours before it is in the box will fail. If the professionals had been apprised of the cunning Cummings plan the debate and policy could have been rational and included the term 'affimer'

trader72
The News at One on the radio said all positive LFT must be confirmed with a positive PCR

Trouble is CO and PL, in the early stages these N protein/RNA antigens and PCRs don't work to control anything so we have lockdown. You can't confirm a false positive with a test that throws up more false positives than the LFT but the original post was pointing out that the confirmatory PCR is going to throw up a false negative thus rubbishing AffiDX. CO believes PCR and rnaLFT detect as early as affimers even though innova says they do not and PCR imo do not detect spikes and cannot be a home test for mass use.
Coming out of lockdown you have to have the right regime. PCR and rnaLFT are not part of a successful one but recipe for failure.

Research hospitalised cases with mass spec but asymptomatic and mild vaccinated persons just test again until negative. The regime has to be a simple return to normality not isolating the non infectious for ages. Sorry to monopolize I hate being front of house but the LFT has to have the right roll out to be accepted and I fear for that not being the case with the latest edict.

Hope you understand more about LFTs now guys!