Member Info for doze

I think that is the case Rollyroll where it is boxed as the sovereign test

I think verifiable results have to be the norm if we are to be properly prepared for future pandemics. We will have to make the effort to show we are 'clean'. It will be tricky to have it accepted this time.

I think Matt was born in 85. What will this generation say about the present in the future?

I was referring to a Myles tweet & long spread who is joining Paul for questions.

Thanks LLP. What site did you find the SINT info as I couldn't find it on LStockE? Who would be providing those numbers although maybe large orders at opening were provided by the MMs in a daily raid which did not shake out as hoped but still made them plenty.

He tweeted a 173,000 new long spread which will be up 86.5k this week Matt=tax free in a spread bet too.

I expect lots of delayed reporting with SP holding up so well

I don't think your second test is feasible. Repeat AffiDX will show when not infectious and the first +ve test with AffiDX I believe will not be bettered as a first indicator of infection. These scientists don't like simple but do have to churn out their research to get paid.

Put Sujood back on!

I think it is a bit more simple, the staff at Wetherby don't want to spend all day replying to emails from the US. It does indicate a lot of US interest.

The best don't sell early post I've read, sentiment is king.

I was hoping for an exotic first name from you Sujood then you sign off with Andy-can't say I'm not disappointed. Perhaps not from South Korea then.

Good attitude and the least disruption to society Zero. Get the test out asap Boris.

It will be the other way round McGurk. Affimers will go to China where the Innova test is made.

Quite Ndn, what was he trained to do if he continues promoting PCR it is because it has paid his wages for years and is brainwashed like a lot of the scientific community. They don't bother about spread of colds as they are endemic and difficult to stamp out. Covid is a cold disease that requires (or does not require-when put to a vote in parliament) the affimer LFT to control spread.
I don't disagree re carehome comment of Deeks but it would be a bit silly when you already have had a test that is negative.

That was @ Ndn re Deeks

He might as well shut up shop and go home then- the windbag- but agree with him about human behaviour and therefore that has to be overcome by compulsory testing where necessary so LFT use is worth the effort.

Sorry to hear that Zero; now what would you think, being in the thick of it, of a daily LFT affimer test until -ve as a regime for you? Do you think a compulsory negative test before you are allowed out is a good control of spread?

stopstopgo, there is no point pretending PCR has any virtue iro comparison to LFT as only the instant result conducted at home is going to be a safe control method. PCR is good for research after you have caught covid and been hospitalised. Cases of +ve LFT must isolate at home until -ve. Until this policy is adopted the regime will fail as it has to date especially with cost. 7x65m=£455m is the cost for everyone in England to have a test. Any areas that get an outbreak then residents need one test to be clear or repeat tests until clear. Keep it simple. AVCT will prove concept and spread around the world. This should have been tried a year ago.

stopstopgo, as strips are used in LFTs they do not undergo PCR. The N protein is detected at later stages of infection by the Mologic LFT but it is better to detect the S protein at an earlier stage. Why wait for the last indicator when affimers get first shot at covid?