Member Info for Doyezee

Absolutely Agree JayneC. Network protection is going to be one of the hottest areas for decades to come IMO as we continue to move into an ever increasing world of digitisation and I believe DT will be a front runner in providing the security needed.

https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/949788/barclays-says-bp-is-the-most-misunderstood-large-oil-company-949788.html

Agree Bluerill

Peter, Aston got plenty of attention from yesterday’s race and very much the wanted kind this time ;-))

https://apple.news/Ai-m-fnVvTWuXQXEXQ8Q4vw
And once the next gen infotainment is applied (along with any other internal tweaks), it will be right on the money as will all of Aston’s cars

5th and 8th, fantastic drives by both Seb and Lance today and team tactics spot on too :-)

Volume has dropped significantly so looks like this was played big time through the IPO but I believe it has a very bright future regardless as a LTH. GLA

International Renewable Energy Agency Director General this morning interviewed on Bloomberg saying Green Hydrogen will be 10-12% of the energy market by 2030 but also iterated that a number of companies with the technology are viable today. He also reiterated the need for G7 to act now regarding transition so future looking good.

International Renewable Energy Agency Director General this morning interviewed on Bloomberg saying Green Hydrogen will be 10-12% of the energy market by 2030 but also iterated that a number of companies with the technology are viable today. He also reiterated the need for G7 to act now regarding transition so future looking good :-)

Mcboatface, APPLE is down a little over 10% of all time high and Google 5%-how are these stocks being crushed exactly?!!! Sell them at your own peril. They will be the biggest companies and cash generators around for many many years IMO

This will come good Retirement Plan - patience!! Just add on the drops. This is a strong LTH for me :-)

Effectively, you’re saying he would be ‘forcing’ himself (AML) to accept a higher rate of 10.5%! If that were deemed outside of acceptable margins for such an issuance, that would be an abuse of his position and hence a conflict of interest

My point is he can’t be benefiting personally, directly or indirectly from the Bond deal - particularly if AML FORCED TO PAY 10.5%. If this percentage was deemed overly high when looking at the market place and Stroll signed off on it whilst benefiting from the future payments AML will pay, it would be a conflict of interest! It would simply be exploitation of his position at AML and whilst I know we live in a corrupt world, I cannot for one second believe something so blatant as that could be lawful.

And in fact, the more I think about it, I doubt Stroll or anyone else linked to AML is benefitting from the debt repayments. As you said yourself, they went to market wanting to pay 8-9% interest on the debt but it was much higher so if he had any part to play in that directly or indirectly and stood to benefit personally it would be seen as gross manipulation for personal gain and hence a conflict of interest

C26, you don’t do yourself any favours do you. Re-read my post and tell me where I said IT WAS unlawful? You’re the only person I know who’s in bad company when he’s on his own! As I said, I DONT KNOW FIR SURE but from my own limited business experience, it sounds like it would be a conflict of interest if it were to be the case that Stroll and anyone else directly or indirectly linked to a position of significant control over AML were to benefit from the bond issuance. I would have thought it would have to be stated in the annual accounts if it were legal at the very least. I will attempt to seek some clarification from colleagues. In the meantime, try to just to project a little class instead of being an ar5e!!!!!

I don’t know for sure but I’d be surprised if it were lawful for Stroll or anyone else directly linked to and in a position of direct control over the company to directly or indirectly benefit from any form of lending to the company other than by way of a Director loan or similar. It would be too easy and a conflict of interest if he/they were to have benefitted from the bonds. They could just take their 10-15% over the term, bleed AML dry and walk away writing off any other losses against tax. Plus I don’t think the likes of Moers & Co would be there if that was the game plan. For me, they can’t be benefiting and part of the bond debt as it would be a conflict of interest in that form plus even if it were lawful, it would have to be declared in the accounts.

Anyone’s guess Charles but I think DT has a very very strong future. AI is going to be the next generation of leading tech and will be a massive part of our infrastructure of which security will be front and centre and of paramount importance. DT will be one of the leaders if not the leader IMO.

Volume incredibly low again which is so disappointing. Of course there’s a long way to go but I can’t believe the recent partnership news alone has not rocketed the SP up to and past 175p - the price at the last and quite recent capital raise!!!

They’ll all come good retirement plan! As will Darktrace. The pullback here no surprise given the flash run up since ipo but 350-365 looks well supported so onwards and upwards from here hopefully.

The bottom line is that prior to Stroll taking control, no matter what was good or bad about AML, as a business it was failing and unsustainable. Stroll, along with the superb executive appointments he’s made has put AML on a firmer footing with a much much better chance of a very bright future. Those commenting otherwise are blind. Long and strong AML :-))))