Member Info for dolphin5

Questions are repeated because the company keeps repeating the same mistakes, simples!!! So again I have highlighted the errors in the share allotment form and also asked how much money was raised at the last placing? Was it as per the RNS or per the share allotment form? The differences are out out by a factor of 10 and 100 times for the two allotment made on 14 June .

98889 Another lie and false allegation. Yet again why not argue your case rather than posting lies 98889?? Each time you, Jabberba and AudibleEnergy post your insults and lies the more you undermine any credible argument for investing in the company. Instead you are turning the board into the next CTAG bulletin board and look what happened there. It is your choice , carry on posting insults and false allegations and you just debase this board.

Just forward copies of the postings on here . This morning's one fully explains the dichotomy between the RND statement and the information on he share allotment form filed yesterday. As they are looking at that then they can check all the other forms back to December 2015 for errors and correct them. Simples, even for a Chippy .

Piltick,. So highly relevant comments about the company and its finances are irrelevant. Yet cut and pasting of whole articles which only relevance is they contain the word hydrogen is all okay with you. Why don't you just filter if you don't like the posts? We could all complain about the cut and paste posts which are irrelevant to the company and its future. Instead I either ignore them or filter the posters. I don't try and obstruct them posting by insulting them or asking why they post. Is scrutiny of a publicly traded company now not allowed? What will you say to IC, any of the daily papers or other investment blogs; please don't comment on my investment unless you say nice things about it? Had the snowflakes now migrated to investment bulletin boards?

So you don't like public scrutiny of s publicly traded company? Yet you enjoy the privileges of limited liability but want none of the responsibilities that goes with it. What a hypocrite. Let hard working taxpayers support the tax breaks of your investment but not allow any scrutiny of the company. Just like Jabberba you post like a ramper desperate to suppress any comment which isn't ramping the share.

Well you seem very disconcerted by the postings if you aren't concerned about them. Why have you posted so much about them ? If they are such an issue for you why haven't you filtered them?

Well if you disagree with the points raised in my post please explain. Is the share allotment form correct or is the RNS about the share placing correct? Instead, you post your insinuation. Only a ramper would deem the post as a negative. A balanced approach, where are you Dodger47 questioning other posters with many blatent ramping ?? No questioning their posts, so not a balanced approach from you. That leads to only one conclusion about your attitude towards ramping.

Dodger47, If you are unhappy with the posting then you can filter it, contact the company and ask them if my posting is correct or point out where I am wrong. This isn't the first time I have highlighted the issue and posters reply that they don't care about the errors in the forms. But other readers of this board can and do read all the posts as part of their investment decisions. So it is up to you if you wish to discuss it with the company.

Admin errors... These are simple company procedures and if they can't get these right then what does that say about the management's quality control procedures? How will they cope with new and unusual admin procedures such as building a new product without any quality issues? Well Olliespop you must be worried about the posts so they must be hitting the target as they say. If not why don't you filter posters you don't like??.

Expose a private investor scrutiiniding s public company.,a threat by a ramper. Well ADMIN will be interested in your disruption of this board. If you weren't ramping then you would just filter posters you didn't agree with.

I don't see any bashing of the share. Instead there are fact based questions raised about the company, its business model, RNS announcements and financial reporting. Only a ramper would call this bashing rather than proper discussion about a publicly traded company. Only rampers would want to enjoy the privileges of limited liability and generous tax breaks but not accept the responsibility of public scrutiny of the company. Poor Lollipops complaining about discussion of the company. Now why would he not want analysis and public scrutiny of a company which had to withdraw its audited accounts because of the many errors in them, late filing its audited accounts, late filing its directors appointment form, file share allotment forms with numerous errors in them, issuing interim accounts with errors in them etc etc. Rampers don't,,t want scrutiny.

And there's your agenda and you are not the innocent angel you seek to portray just another ramper. Rather than disagree or raise arguments against my postings you post insults and seek to stop any argument which isn't ramping the share. What a disposable and shallow life to prevent free speech. Perhaps you will enjoy your life in North Korea with their attitude towards public speech.

Thank you , you have thrown your insults and when asked what you disagree about my question on Tresoil Biofuels SRL don't reply. If you don't t want to read posts that fail to support your cause 100% then you have that option to filter. Instead you seek to impose your views and prevent anyone else from posting alternative views. No need to answer as you have failed to present a coherent and cogent argument.

Distracting from discussing z new businesses partner announced via RNS? What don't you like about the questions on Tresoil Biofuels SRL? Piltick is clearly concerned about the questions as he would rather throw insults and push posters off this site who don't follow his agenda. So let's go back to this business partner, Tresoil Biofuels SRL. Please explain what you don't like about these questions?

Tax breaks include investing via ISA , pension schemes, the tax free capital gains limit and also the ISA inheritance tax exemption for most AIM companys. So you and your estate do or would benefit from the tax breaks. Secondly, if you don't like opposing views you have the choice to filter them on here. Instead you continue to read and then insult posters who fail to follow you in promoting ( or is that ramping) the share for your capital gain. You try and plead all innocence but then complain about one or two posters with alternative views. Why don't you also complain about others with their abusive postings? Or those that just cut and paste any article which has the word hydrogen or waste in it? Let's just discuss Tresoil Biofuels SRL. This is a new business partner announced via RNS do is material and share price sensitive. It said the company was successful. Yet looking at accounts raised question which have not answered. What other projects have they been involved in and what is their financial strength if they are to promote the company in Romania? How is that bring negative? How is that slating the company? A real investor would accept these and answer them. A ramper would complain and moan about the poster rather than the message. Do we know from your complaining what you are. Until you accept unlimited liability then you have to accept public debate.

What expose a company for having filed audited accounts with errors in them? What expose a company for filing share allotment forms with errors in them? What expose a company for publishing interim accounts with errors in them? What expose a company for asking what projects their new business partner had previously been involved in? What expose a company for asking why a director's appointment form had not been filed? What expose a company for asking about a director s role in a private company which traded and shares half their profits with them? What expose a company for asking how many employees were recruited following a share placing which specifically mentioned it was new money to recruit sales staff? Or expose investors who want the public to shoulder the liability and give tax breaks while the shareholders revel in limited liability protection? .

Piltick,. So you want limited liability and tax breaks paid for by hard working families. But you run crying because posters raise questions about a business? Why do you disagree with public scrutiny of a public company? Instead of complaining why not ask the company to trade as an unlimited business entity? Oh no you want maximum profits but none of the risks, how shallow. Only rampers would protest about questions of their investment.

Hi AudibleEnergy, your "tyre..." can that be used in the new 25tpd unit ??

I know it is such a difficult choice; 98889 or Chippyjo.

Okay for rampers to post repetitive hype to push the share and don't want to be questionef nor challenged about this hype. Well why don't they trade as an unlimited entity and the shareholders not enjoy the privileges of limited liability and tax breaks? Oh no you don't have the balls to accept this so instead throw insults. So you accept the privileges but don't want any responsibility. If you don't want to read my posts you can easily filter me, so why haven't you? How many AIM company accounts have had to be withdrawn because of your postings?