Member Info for djwall1s

I originally posted it to our DGI Telegram group hence the time disparity.

Reply received from DGI just now:

'Dear xxxxxx,

 

I hope this finds you well and many thanks for your email.

 

I completely understand your shock following Monday’s RNS, which we were of course most disappointed to have to issue. Please rest assured that the Board is fully committed to establishing the facts of the matter and is working diligently to do so before taking an appropriate course of action.

 

Many thanks for your support and understanding.'

 

Best Regards,

Jack Allardyce

CFO

 

On point. What does the 'persecuted' swazers actually know about this, as well as his cheerleading squad suddenly turning up here?

It's a headscratcher, isn't it?

You know, I don't know what the problem is with not expecting these small firms to raise funds. You really do use it as an excuse to cause total chaos. Nobody likes it but it happens hundreds of times, people moan and then things settle down, and we all move on. Things need funding. If you're prepared to sit tight you often see good reasons for such fund raises.

If she sold because she was frightened of a fund raise in order to make product as soon as 2025 she might as well sell up her entire mansion and come and work with the other half-baked sorts on here, going round telling people that every fund raise = bad. Even if it's the case that it is on its way, a lot of us here accept that it often needs to happen to get to better things longer term. It's how these markets work at this level.

I suspect any raises wouldn't be outlandish either, given the way the company has restructured itself.

Very under the radar share. Great promise on these assets imo. Obviously there'll be a raise at some point but could be a winner with so few shares swishing about and good governance/prospects.

Yep, all so they can make a few bob on a potentially stabilising RNS. If it's not they'll not have lost a great deal, they'll move onto the next smash and grab target. You get to recognise the boiler room names round here pretty quickly.

And neither am I buttering up the company, it needs to act before it tips off a cliff.

Cheers SL. Sorry to read about Christian's mother. And explains the lack of comms.

Let's see what they come up with. Ideally a boot up the arris of certain certains!

Don't stick around then. You only tend to show up to knocks stuff anyway.

It is trolling when you don't know your AIM from your elbow.

It's not your business. It's our business. You only get an opinion just don't expect to be lauded just for rocking up.

"same strategy on micro caps."

Same trolling of someone elses stock that you cannot possibly hold and haven't done a jot of research on.

For me, and I'm sure most others, it'll be a huge relief if they just get rid of the pair of them now. The damage this has done and the destruction of share price and investor confidence is apparent and even in 24 hrs the uncertainty is doing the company no good.

The company needs to focus on its terrific tech and team, not people who bring it into disrepute, whether they deliberately meant to or not. I'm a reasonable person but I'd certainly make the Boughtwoods past history if I had my say..toxic mud sticks unless you wash it right away straight away.

I'm inclined to agree. I don't think either the Boughtwoods tenures here are viable and if he's allowed to stay on it will rebound endlessly on the company.

You large shareholders as people who have met the company approached them yet?

Worth noting that her husband was the one that reported it in. But is his position actually tenable anymore? With this wording it appears not to be so secure:

'Martin Boughtwood is co-operating fully with the Company's investigation and the Board is considering appropriate courses of action in the circumstances, both in respect of Martin Boughtwood's position as a Director and also his role within the Company. Further announcements will be made in due course as appropriate.'

It does look that way - premeditated, and trying to get away with lots of sells.

Was she caught in her tracks before offloading more or had she finished? I'm amazed at the arrogance of thinking you could get away with this when it's driving the sp down for no good reason, not after the latest positive EVage news, which we should have soared on tbh.

I assume it to be the same guy because 'Boughtwood' is an unusual/rare name and to be called that and Martin, just by coincidence would surely be very long odds.

Well...yes, that's what I was quoting. Oak vs Boughtwood/PML of that time, 2009/10. It's one case and not a good look for him, but it is also over 13 years ago.

I'm not excusing it. What I'm enquiring about is does he have a potted history of this sort of thing? Because I couldn't find anything else. And clearly DGI saw fit to take him on. Perhaps now to their detriment, but they still gave him a position with them.

Can you provide a link please because I typed in his name and it only brought up the cases involving him and Oak from 2009/10. TIA.

Highly likely. But to be fair that issue with Oak went back to 2009/10, and there seems to be nothing else on him on that Casemine site. Or on Denise.