Member Info for djwall1s

This is a company that puts out product timelines, has done presentations, including on YouTube and keeps people informed via RNS and LinkedIn.

It's all out there to DYOR and I did after landing here green a couple of months ago. If I can do it, why can't mickee p and all these others stating 'Tell me x y z'- do your research and find the answers if you're not just here as wind-up merchants. It's not rocket science, its so easy to do.

...and I'm sure discussed before but I really liked the addition of colour pictures to the recent Ops Update here. It's rare to see any company bother to put pictures, let alone colour ones, to relay the quality of the minerals found into RNSs. I hope they continue in this 'vein' when it comes to Ops updates as it can be helpful to current and prospective holders, and I don't know of many 'LT'-type people who aren't for shareholder friendliness.

I call out troublemakers and trolls and ythere are plenty of them. You have big form on here. So yes, I will call you out.

It's almost as if you don't do any company research for yourself, asking others do your work for you. Well wise up.

Thanks herne.

Man, he looks rough.

Can you link it please, herne?

It's still early days and this is so under the radar. Not really a bad thing if you want to accumulate at a cheap as chips price. I think the backend of this year and 2025 is where the real action will be but plenty of time for surprises before then. Until then it's just a case of DYOR and tuck these away.

Utter bollards.

Date Time Trade Prc Volume Buy/Sell Bid Ask Value

12-Apr-24 13:59:49 1.119 100,000 Sell* 1.10 1.15 1,119

Can categorically state this was NOT a sell.

I don't understand why it needs to be complicated. Just report regular smaller at least trades accurately as buy or sell. It's so simple to do.

Why on earth did you 'by in' if you have to ask other will value be created.

What surreal nonsense is this now?

Sorry but there was always a reason you were green coffined. Just a shame one has to see such idiocracy before signing in.

They're like a chuffing toothache that lasts a day, bombards you with cack and then gone a day later. Off to harague some other poor sod's forum whilst trying to sound like the voice of all authority. :/

It's quite staggering how unloved and ignored this stock is with what it has going and planned but these bafflers do happen. Doesn't mean it'll stay that way indefinitely.

Because some people want to cause trouble.

Suggest just block it before it turns another forum into a mess. Nobody needs this antagonistic, deramping garbage guzzler.

There seems to be a lot of people trying to get holders to switch teams here.

I like HEX, and have advocated for having a hand in both but it's becoming rather obvious that people are cross ramping in earnest now.

Comedy gold.

Oxygen do you have experience of dealing with the Tanzanian government?

You are strange.

'Pursuant to the company's Articles of Association and as set out in the notice of General Meeting, a general meeting of shareholders is quorate if there are two or more shareholders present in person or by proxy and holding ordinary shares conferring in aggregate 25 per cent. or more of the voting power of the Company.'

I assume that 'by proxy' means you send a representative on behalf of yourself. If the company didn't put out a webinar to holders then one assumes that, as stated, they required at least 2 shareholders to be present in the room.

Yes, there could be some incompetence on the company's part here, but I do think it's likely that the vast majority of their holders on a London-listed AIM entity are going to be British and therefore based here.

It's hard to deny that HE1 is cosying up to government-linked people of the highest order in that country. You just don't play that game to turn round and say that there's nothing there.

Just flesh on the bones required via EWT, which all companies have to do. Otherwise it looks very much off to the races to me.

Like I said, it'd be a staggering amount of time and effort to get multiple players and governments involved here to run a dud. They know they have something viable, it's just a case of measuring how much. If it was so-so and wishy washy I doubt we'd be getting these types of 'pushing onwards' comms. They'd be less-than-subtely wrapping it up a couple of RNSs back.

I also (just personally) see HE1 very much twinned with Noble in the sense of the benefits of both data boosting the others potential and therefore, hopefully outside interest at some stage, which may come for both at the same time. Who knows, that's the thrill of the chase here, right? :)

If LSE allowed pictures I'd be posting that Julia Roberts theorem gif. The amount of mental gymnastics to drag down a decent update, which bodes well overall and actually benefits shareholders, is astounding. And yet unsurprising given the amount of deceit that goes on on these forums.