RE: Pyrite aka Fools Gold17 Oct 2025 08:20
I think this RNS raises more questions than answers. I have noticed how Ed Mead has progressively been less excited with each update. The cores looked poor. Pyrite on its own means nothing. It ‘could’ contain gold but considering they drilled 950m there was no mention or reiteration of mineralisation, alteration, quartz zones etc, no chalcopyrite, nothing!
I know how to read an RNS and it weren’t good. And it’s obvious many agree with me (quietly) because people trying just a bit too hard to big it up!