Member Info for DeathStranding

Did you get the live map open parkez? It's a good source of info.

By the way 3131 was previously held by Conroy, surrendered in 2014 according to the online system.

Try this parkez. Hopefully it opens the map viewer. If not just web search "minerals ireland opals viewer". Select "PL Areas - Current PL Status" from the Layers List. You can search for the PL numbers in the search box.
https://dcenr.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=da2d9d49c3364f84a0f46ad0da0eeee8

Your map is almost as out of date as Conroy's investor presentation LOL.
I'll post a link to the Minerals Ireland live license map.

They exist parkez, don't worry.
4559 is adjacent to the east of 4098, around Cootehill if you see that on a map.
4554 is separate to the other PLs and is further to the east between Corduff and Laragh, just north of Carrickmacross.

Kittila in Finland is good to look at as a successful European refractory gold operation. 30 Million tonnes at 4 g/t. Also uses an autoclave for pressure oxidation.
https://www.agnicoeagle.com/English/operations/operations/kittila/default.aspx

Why would a link to Petropavlosk's massive POX hub be relevant to Conroy, Troajan? The latest Conroy studies (2014) used BIOX.

2 g/t is good grade, not especially high grade because the gold is refractory so harder to recover and more expensive to process.
Sub 1 g/t might be fine for a big heap leach operation but not here. Important to have that perspective.

Clontibret resource grade = 2 g/t
Strike length = 0.8km

Clay Lake is a low grade, early stage exploration prospect. I'm interested to see what develops there from the JV's exploration.
But talk of 15 million ounces is nonsense when the company has 517,000 ounces in resource and so far only sun economic drill results elsewhere from those many years of exploration.
That's my opinion parkez and I'm more than happy to discuss the merits of the projects if you are interested.

That's nonsense parkez, enjoy your weekend.

Let's see how things shape up in the next 3-4 months.

I think 34p is fair value for current status so I wouldn't say I'm negative. I have a cautious outlook based on the available facts. The company has to overcome significant market mistrust and in my opinion it is going about this in the wrong way. Let's just see. Unless they announce a more comprehensive plan for the JV, then it could get quiet here for a while if the next thing we have to look forward to is drill results. So far it seems Demir are also taking a very cautious approach - can hardly blame them.

Which report is that Troajan?

It's not a non-dilutive cash injection. It's 1 million cash to CGNR plus 4.5 million spent on the project which directly dilutes CGNR's interest in the projects.
Confirmation that the JV would complete was announced 10 days ago so I don't know why there would be expectation of a significant move today.
Also worth bearing in mind that the share price was 10p before any JV was announced, so in that context it is up over 200% on the back of the JV alone without any new drilling having been done.

Great to watch those video links from 2.5 years ago to wonder how it looked so good and went so horribly wrong.
Keep up the good work Troajan.

Seems the blinkers are on this morning.

Troajan - the mine has been producing for 2 years already, 2019 production and costs forecasts are out the window. I wish for many reasons we could all go back to 2019, but we can't.

Too right I moaned about the drilling campaign, it is well short of what the company should be announcing as a work programme having spent 18 months to bring in a funding partner, and that is reflected in the share price. What I don't understand is why you and others are not willing to challenge the company and its leadership to do better for their shareholders. You just think the share price should magically re-rate. Sorry, but I don't settle for that.

Of course it is good news because the co badly needs it, but its a formality, soon gets spent just running a plc and others seem to be making it out to be more than it is. It is one twelfth of the company's current market cap. Parkez seemed to be worried about it and there's no need to be.
Thanks for your investment advice, fairview, well intended I am sure.