Member Info for dai2belts

I don't know, they say they need to submit a revised report, so unless there is pre-validation.. you would expect to see the application is on hold.. but without knowing the process I am just talking rubbish??

I guess that extra area adds ~800m around the edge, so the boundary is 800m further away from the centre in all directions, if a perfect circle.. With that structure being up to 3000m below the surface what purpose could making another site visit serve unless they have X-ray glasses or deep tunnel mole holes to drop stones down.... Unless ?

Maybe there must be a frack induced earth quake zone to consider , who knows ;)

They can't lie, but we know that can word up dates so there are many interpretation, until the final picture is painted..

With the current picture being they are re-entering the well I bet many interpret additional opportunities as post discovery, especially with future developments mentioned..

==========================

"Due to the expansion of the structural closure to approximately 350 km² - an increase of 50 km² - the Company and its consultants are now required to submit a revised EIR to DEMIRS due to reflect the additional development opportunities within the field and enhanced scope of future field development. "

What if

"Due to the expansion of the structural closure to approximately 350 km² - an increase of 50 km² - the Company and its consultants are now required to submit a revised EIR to DEMIRS due to reflect the additional development.........."

Lol, Take it down for maximum upside.... after forwarding selling

This could be forward selling. https://invst.ly/1890zw

Interesting is the Aussie executives putting in millions of their own cash, both Noble and GEX, both very high risk, I suspect they must be hedging it some how

1. Would be a complete fraud, but it some how ended up listing on AIM not ASX ?

2. We seen how He1 played; silence, reluctance to give info, No rig,, then suddenly from rock bottom its all buzz words..

3. Delays, how many times did DM go quiet until there was a new set of ducks lining up..Trouble is bad luck also gives the opportunity to create extra upside

Zeph should also get a resource upgrade if flow rates are improved, as I believe the well design increases recoverability which is also indicated in Matd's docs for using lateral wells as opposed to horizontal

PANR, this drill is targeting a conventional play, not tight so no fracking, maybe a game changer if a discovery and it flows commercially..

Zeph, this well is designed to greatly enhance flow rates for an already proven discovery.. So if the lateral is completed without issues then the chances are good for improving the flow liquids...

That well design could then be applied to the follow ups.. It would be like Matd's enhanced model that almost doubles the companies NAV from the base model that uses horizontal wells..

Https://browser.dataspace.copernicus.eu/?zoom=14&lat=-10.45536&lng=40.03022

Maybe they did'nt do the AIM style sales talk, and are letting the results do the talking..

They did'nt promote a potentially massively bigger than big resource..

For the dips, if you were not holding you consider the change from the peak to the next dip automatically, but if you sold you tend to go from your selling price, and the profit you keep buying back that dip.. QED if I sold at 4p I probably would have bought back at 3.1p, definitely if sold at 4.35p as my investment would have been recovered..

I tend to walk away, but this year have really missed out doing so..

PANR bought about 17.2p sold 27.4p, then it dipped ~24p and in is now 36p

QED, bought about 1.2p, sold 3.4p it reached 4.5p, then it dipped 3.1p, stayed away as fund raise is any time unless nothing is happening Q1, clipped 8p..

but

Should have taken the profit on these two as was up +30%

Matd held for +4p as hit so many times, sold for a few pint

Gex, haș turned bad with the last update blowing the credibility of Hamilton

Those 10%s make a difference, especially over the long term..

Mind you I think you have to take the opportunity quickly and not wait for say a 3rd dip to confirm a pattern as its often over by then.. Plus you need to get both the peak and dip right to benefit, so not so easy.. These days once I have a good profit I like to keep it making the buy back a tough decision

@kev, the trades list is disrupted by bot trades, and then the BB has a queue of trolls waiting to step in if one should turn ramper or go quiet.. What beats me is that it makes a mockery of this websites BBs..

Its all crazy, AIM CEO's spin yarns and the supporting forums can be agenda driven chaos.. When Noble misquoted facts ASX police pulled them over and they had to correct their statements.. No wonder AIM is on a down trend, you have to be a gambler to dip your toe in

Interesting, CLN's will be issued at 3 prices 8.75p, 9.35p and 12.5p...

If read correctly they total £548, 387, and pay 12%..?

But the issue prices suggest a combined total of ~£980k, can anybody explain this difference ?

16.9 Convertible Loan Note

In June 2021 Georgina issued 12% unsecured convertible loan notes to various investors in the company. On 11 July 2024 conditional on, inter alia, the completion of the Acquisition and Re-admission, the holders of the convertible loan notes in Georgina agreed to cancel their notes in exchange for £548,387 12% unsecured convertible loan notes in the Company. The convertible notes are divided into three classes, which convert into, in aggregate, 10,967,728 Ordinary Shares. Under the CLN the Company will issue: (i) 9,376,000 Class A loan notes, convertible at £0.0875; (i) 1,263,568 Class B loan notes convertible at £0.09375; and (it) 328,160 Class C loan notes convertible at £0.125. The notes shall automatically convert at the relevant conversion price on the earlier of: () Re-admission (where a Convertible Loan Noteholder has executed a CSS Lock-in Agreement ahead of Re-admission: or (li) immediately at any point after Re-admission if a CSS Lock-in Agreement is signed by the relevant Convertible Loan Noteholder in the six months following Re-admission; or (ili) six months and one day after Re-admission in any event where a Convertible Loan Noteholder has not executed a CSS Lock-in Agreement.

That 1 trade bot is still running, previously it was a seller now its a buyer ?

probably its been forgotten about

Need to have a think about Zeph, as results will be some time after TD, and take a look at how the price previously moved between approach to TD and flow results..

And a look at PANR, that has gone on another run waiting for drill results and news of flow test.. It dipped to 24p after TD and an early quarterly repayment and is now 50% higher 36p...

Its a shame they are not giving the customer names, unlike they did for Glencore..

Not sure what to think about this one, I think in floated at 28p, dropped to about 24p...Dec 31st U.S. private placement ~30p..

Does'nt seem to be popular on AIM, are we missing something ?

I expected a turnip not a potato, at least I think it was a potato..

I can't find any evidence for a Well Permit or drilling, I believe applications should be shown under "endorsement" comparing with other companies with applications in process

https://pgr.dmp.wa.gov.au/PGR/Titles/DisplayTitle.aspx?d=%2fxafR%2f74B0PcNn%2f9jV%2fwWWZ2D34N6cCUyYC29EXUhCoYZStSUOCCQEl4rbgxGwGyR7kOVa4DImI%3d

You would think if they had submitted documents for the application, and then been asked to make amendments that provide further details the process would be put on hold.. Applications on hold appear under endorsement with decision pending

I remember reading an article about Frances rivers and nuclear power station, If I recall correctly it was a hot summer so the rivers had to be used more frequently for cooling, overheating the rivers enough to have an environmental impact. Apparently some species couldn't tolerate the higher temperatures... Higher temperatures in summer increases demand, couple that with global warming and artificially heating rivers to cool nuclear power stations , then we another environmental issue...

We have seen increase in power demand through industrialisation, building of commuter based societies and now we have the always on, always connected world, where almost everything requires power..When you watch Open All Hours that shop has a mechanical till, and weighting scales, all good without power .. A modern supermarket would be stuffed if there was a power outage, and without internet I doubt they could take card payments.. At home we are told to keep the routers on 24/7 even when not in use, that also adds to the power consumption of the device at the exchange. In many offices, if not the computer, the monitors are often left running in screen saver mode. Local schools have external lighting on over night when nobody is there... So much avoidable demand..

Looking back at school we discussed oil running out while at the same time out of town shopping areas were popping up every where and building the commuter based society was in full swing.. I live in a town centre but need to travel to buy cloths, electrical goods, diy stuff, and get a cheaper food shop..

High prices are also partly because gas is not fixed price, its a must have commodity that goes to the highest bidders when supplies become tight.. I guess you also have market players who buy just to profit, never to consume, so creating nonessential demand especially when supplies are tight..

I don't think domestic energy suppliers are forced to buy from more expensive sources as I believe there is some sort of pricing structure in place to average the cost paid across different sources , but not too sure

Was this inspiration for black adder

https://youtu.be/JJ5D1li3tcU?t=628