Serious Question/breakeven10 May 2018 22:35
I applaud your efforts to analyse the figures Talygarntom but, with respect, I think there are some flaws in the analysis and the approach is over simplistic. You have taken as your starting point the production tonnage of 8811, whereas the more relevant figures are the sales volumes which were 4641 tonnes plus 5000 sq metres of processed slabs. The average sales prices are given as 170 euros per tonne for blocks and 72 euros per sq metre for slabs. If you do the maths on those numbers you get revenue of 1,148, 970, not a million miles away from the quoted revenue of 1,203,270 (the difference presumably being the result of using averages). A large proportion of our costs will either be fixed or non recurring. So a better guide to margin would be to look at the direct cost of sales, which was 795,895. So, from that cost, we generated about half that in gross profit. Ignoring head office costs etc therefore the margin is currently about 50%. We know the margin on processed marble is much higher than with blocks and, with the completion of the factory, we can expect the proportion of processed marble to constitute a higher proportion of sales going forward. If you assume conservatively doubling block sales and quadrupling processed slab sales (never mind the even higher margins on tiles) you get to revenue of over 3m euros of which about 1.5m would be gross profit (probably more if you assume cost of sales declining as a proportion of revenue). Knock off 0.5m costs on non recurring plant and equipment purchases and say a similar amount for non recurring quarry development and you are only about 0.5m from breakeven. All very crude admittedly but we dont know the precise margins or have clear view of how margins will improve with the sale of more in house processed marble, but my feeling is that the prospects are rosier than your calculations would suggest.