RE: POG27 Jan 2020 18:49
With all due respect, I think folks are over complicating the put option business, which is very clearly explained in the RNS. 60,000 ounces is roughly the entire production for H1. They have bought put options which give them the option (but no obligation) to sell those ounces at the strike price of £1350. Clearly the options will not be exercised unless the gold price falls below £1350 but, if it does, then they know that they can at least get the £1350 for the ounces sold under the options, thus ensuring that they can meet debt repayments. In effect, as the RNS states, they have put a floor under the gold price. It may well be that the number of ounces covered by the options reduces by a sixth each month but, if so, it matters not. If the price only falls below £1350 in the 6th month of the half year, and by that stage the cover provided by the options has reduced to only 10,000 ounces, fine, because that's all they have left to produce in that half year, having sold the other 50,000 at market rates above the strike price. It works the same way if they are only covered for 10,000 ounces in any of the six months, as they will only have 10,000 ounces to sell in any month. The precise mechanics don't matter but I am confident that the effect is as described. Any other interpretation is simply inconsistent with the plain words of the RNS in my opinion.