Member Info for Crocqman

Oh. Already gone whilst writing my reply.
Good weekend all

Funny how you agree with me on twitter when my view coincides with yours, and abuse me when it doesn't.

BTW, you earlier commented that you did not know who fool was and couldn't comment on the obvious suggestion that you are one and the same, and now you sign yourself off as 'Fool'.
Talk about not being the sharpest tool.

If 'free speech' means continually abusing people, swearing and ranting on twitter at anyone who you disagree with (who has no right to reply), blocking anyone who differs to your opinion to prevent the debate you are supposedly so keen on, and deleting your own inaccurate comments when found out in order to hide the truth around your real agenda, then I am happy to disengage.
Additional posts reported
#warpedviewofdebate
#ToomanyFridaynightbeers

It's funny how some people have an overwhelming hatred of LSE and everyone on it, borne purely out of their being banned for repeated abusive and disruptive behaviour, and yet they are totaly obsessed with reading every single post on here and commenting about it on twitter, copying and pasting posts to spout their anger and bile at anythng that goes against thier own, biased view, whilst continuing to claim that LSE is 'corrupt'.
Oh, and also claiming to be LTH's who buy and hold who hate traders, whilst trading theselves (on the quiet, of course) because 'that is what all rational investors do'
#deludedandtwofacedhypocrite

All Zodiacsign posts repoted

It's funny how some people have an overwhelming hatred of LSE and everyone on it, borne purely out of their being banned for repeated abusive and distuptive behaviour, and yet they are totaly obsessed with reading every single post on here and commenting about it on twitter, copying and pasting posts to spout their anger and bile at anythng that goes against thier own, biased view, whilst continuing to claim that LSE is 'corrupt'.
Oh, and also claiming to be LTH's who buy and hold who hate traders, whilst trading theselves (on the quiet, of course) because 'that is what all rational investors do'
#deludedandtwofacedhypocrite

All Zodiacsign posts repoted

Oh look.
A new poster joins LSE after hours on a Friday and starts to make repeated negative claims, talking to themselves and challenging replies.
#noagendahere

I think the lack of questions over the past few months is down to the fact that a lot was covered on the investor call, comms has been improved of late, and regular RNS' detail what is happening.
Add to this expected newsflow on several fronts, and there is not much else to query without further news.
Plus, the main agitators seem unwilling to ask the company directly for answers to valid concerns when it is easier to speculate and make repeated posts on here to try and spread doubt.
No doubt another reason is that the company will be aware of their personal details when submitting questions and they are worried about making public accusations without hiding behind a nameless avatar for fear of repercussions due to their 'mischievous' intent.
Not long until whichever camp is proved to have picked the right side.
Good weekend all

What has happened to TH2 recently?
Missing his weekly posts about 'topping up at these bargain prices' for this 'soon to be mid cap oiler'.
Has he lost the faith, or has his entire posting history just been ramipng BS?
I sense a trader much like Tymers, advertising all his buys, and recommending buying whilst queitly selling and claiming that this is what any normal investor would be doing.
Meanwhile, anyone who openly admits to trading is classed as a troll swampie by the same hypocritical posters.
TH2, where are you?
Good weekend all

The Antibody Song
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ewJNDxpc9v8

Or
Nothing Else by Antigen

Not the age-old ignorant comment about MM games, or market manipulation due to the buy/sell indicator being incorrectly shown on trades.
Yawn.
Why is it that posters who do not know the reason for something always resort to a sensational view and cry fowl?

There is ZERO obligation to report to the market whether a trade is a Buy or a Sell at the point of execution. It is simply a TRADE. Notihng more, nothing less
All sites (even the official LSE) use an algo to make a best efforts basis 'guess' at the direction based on the mid-price at the time of the trade being reported to market.
It is a guide only, nothing more.
The Trade Reporting requirements are part of an EU Directive (MiFID II) and have been in place in the current format for almost 5 years now. They are very unlikely to change with Brexit too seeing as it took over 2 years to implement.
And no, it is not a straightforward I.T. fix for this to be put right.

Not the age-old comment about manipulation due to the buy/sell indicator shown on trades again.

There is ZERO obligation to report to the market whether a trade is a Buy or a Sell at the point of execution. It is simply a TRADE. Notihng more, nothing less
All sites (even the official LSE) use an algo to make a best efforts basis 'guess' at the direction based on the mid-price at the time of the trade being reported to market.
It is a guide only, nothing more.
The Trade Reporting requirements are part of an EU Directive (MiFID II) and have been in place in the current format for almost 5 years now. They are very unlikely to change with Brexit too seeing as it took over 2 years to implement.
And no, it is not a straightforward I.T. fix for this to be put right.

To be fair ZeroSight, there are probably many posters on many 'so-called covid' stocks, who have no idea what any of the other 'covid rivals' stocks actually do.
It is just lazy generalisation to try and compare one to the other, whether it be market cap, SP, news, etc and whine about the fortunes of one compared to the other (or gloat) based solely on this aspect and not even being aware of any other aspects of the company.
I am sure there are investors here who see Avacta as being a 'covid stock' only.

You only have to look at the Rolls Royce board to see how little some people know about their share investments. There are regular comments from posters there, who claim to be invested, about news flow relating to the car manufacturer.
It is quite worrying, tbh
gla

They must be doing the hokey-cokey with that RNS.
It has been lodged and pulled more often that I care to imagine.

When it does come though, lots of posters will have claimed to have 'called it'.
gla

Not too much of a pedant to pick me up on 'Mirasols's' though!

Points taken, ocelot
1) a badly worded point on my part. I knew what I meant.
2) They can, but is it likely? Most 'contentious' decisions always seem to be left to the last possible minute. They have 13 weeks to review and make a recommendation (for or against), so they could just as well do this in the first week? Everyone appears to habe been using the full 13 weeks for their estimation of when to receive a decision, so 25/11 seems a reasonable comment to make. It is expected in the next 5 trading days then. Is that better? :-)

Have you been taking some of Mirasols's pedantic pills?

littlebricks,
Many funds will have permission/approval within their mandate to buy AIM shares.
They may have limits on the % of the total portfolio they can invest in AIM, the size of an individual holding in any AIM stock, or a minimum market cap for an AIM stock, but being on AIM will not hold back Fund investors at this stage of the company growth too much, imo.
One thing Fund Managers/analysts may also look at is whether management are personally invested as they see this as a good indicator for small cap companies.
For me, therre are plenty of good indicators here to suggest the company can attract large II's and Funds at this time.
It is a crowded space though, so getting coverage from the large firms is important. Hopefully, the addition of a second broker will help with that and lead to introductions, company meetings, etc, to help promote the company.
Longer term, moving to a main market would be a good plan, but there will be plenty of opportunities to attract chunky buyers now, especially after the latest government news and the spotlight being thron on this sector.
gla

Decent volume already today.
I recall there was good uplift on ukog before their Loxley planning (tunred down but currently being appealed). It rose almost 100% in the week leading up to it, peaking on the Friday when the EA granted a permit, before the refusal at the meeting on the Monday caused a rapid drop back.

Not suggesting we will see the same here, but it will be interesting to see if therre are noticeably higher volumes in the run up to any news on 25/11, and any corresponding SP movement. Can see a spike before there is perhaps a sell-off on good news.
It would be good to see news on multiple fronts over the next 2-3 weeks to hopefully see the SP trading in a higher range as we get closer to Q1 and SF.
Interesting times ahead, whichever side of the ANGS fence you are sitting, and plenty to discuss over the coming weeks.
gla

But SS has options they will all cry!

It's just moving back to where it has pretty much been for the past 3 to 4 weeks (with the odd rise/drop).
Low volume today too.
Nothing to get too excited about for me tbh unless volumes are around 10x the current level with some chunky trades.

Plenty of pending news flow could change all that though
gla

That's probably the most positive post I've seen from you on here, Iceman.
You must be warming to the possibilities :-)
gla

It's all been recorded, Furion.
Missed about when it would be made available.
Hopefully presentation, slide and Q&A will be on the website in the next 24/48 hours