Member Info for Chuffchuff

Lookin forward to the feasibility study on Julie

Nice post Nomlas. I thought of Bellers too. My head ended above the surface of the water today. Hope it has for others and the likes of Bellers and other LTH's deserve something for their patience

Ace you must have had some pepper up your nose while typing that

Hi Nap. Ricardo got email reply

"I am happy for you to advise other shareholders that we have confirmed the structure of the ASX listing remains as we have previously described (i.e. in technical terms, a ‘cross listing’, not a dual listing)."

This is in reply to my email to GGP.

Also mentioned in video presentation

It's already been clarified

We've finally started the "regular news" phase which will hopefully gain growing attention leading up to ASX. Looking forward to full quarter figures and the JORC estimates to drive this on further. For myself and others in a similar situation it's time to get our heads back above water with absolute confidence. I'm sure the workforce we inherited must be absolutely buzzing about the security of Telfer jobs and the possitities to be extracted still. Furthermore GGP look to be a decent employer and will do right by everyone. I still hope the FS for Havieron turns up early in the second half to carry ASX momentum forward. There is hope yet that those of us who can't hold forever can still exit in perhaps 12 months with a relieved smile on our face. GLA

Why would you think that Kever? I've never attacked you. I even backed your stance that emails should be responded to. So yes I do think there have been more balanced posts made today by some. But even those have been attacked. Yours against me now kinda confirms where you have decided to go hasn't it? Let's all post about "sucking people off" and agree that wanting that stuff taken down is me being a nazi is it? I find it laughable that people like you and gravy train always cite that we don't attack this person, we don't attack that person when in fact the two people you are on about I don't think I've ever directly engaged with. You really ought to consider better what I wrote.

Good to see some reasonable, informative and balanced posts today. Keep reporting the filthy mouthed intruders for whom nothing is ever enough. Report and don't interact that is.

Let's face it, in relation to the PEL 94 farm out agreement the RNS was pretty vague - which is why Cybertron could be right, or ccc, or neither. It was left pretty vague with no timeline nor any definitive reason for the delay. Whatever anyone says in here is conjecture unless you have inside info because detail is deliberately (though not necessarily unreasonably) absent. Something fairly material appears to have changed late in the negotiation but we don't in truth know whether it is in a positive way or a negative one. Undoubtedly the potential must still be there but being encouraged by the farm-out geological teams expertise and insight whilst acknowledging the licenses merits does not mean it is problem-free. Proper, concrete news is what will move the SP because in reality the deal which was days away at new year has had no updates. I'm not switching colours here by the way, I'm still invested on a free ticket but it is proper news that will dictate whether this is a short term money maker or a rather longer play. Personally I'm pleased that Omar is less prolific on X but there does need to be communication via the email channels that GBP set up. I'll wait on a proper RNS with more detail on the farm-out before leaning any particular way on the oil side of things.

That's devastating Bellers, so sorry to hear this. I'm aretiring in April myself and time frames are certainly important. But your post is a very poignant one and I wish you and your family well.

In support of balance I would suggest that if the CEO proposed that email is the best means of contact to ask questions and receive a response, then that is what should happen. Even if they are busy a max of 10 days is suffient to reply, if only to say "we cannot divulge x or y at this juncture due to xxx". That is reasonable and what I mean by having some balance on this forum. A lack of reply however does not mean the CEO is a fraud, but in my view it doesn't reflect that well either.

I get the sense that LSE admin only look at individual reported posts rather than keep a log of repetitive disruptive behaviour by an account or else some here would be long gone. Especially when some posts are reported and have been removed on the basis they are potentially defamatory or libelous. Could be wrong though. Shame there's not another mechanism for reporting accounts in general rather than individual posts.

That's just the kind of reasonable and balanced post that goes down like a ton of bricks on here Mafs. There's no point reasoning with them though as it is never reciprocated. There is a tendency unfortunately that you will be told you are too clever and they will ultimately get very personal or abusive. I see one already had their posts removed a little while ago for childishly going below the belt on someone. They dish out a lot of misery but really don't like anything back, even if put in quite conciliatory or reasonable terms. I wouldn't bother.

You guys are disgusting. I'm quite open to hear arguments against investing here or to criticisethe CEO etc (as I've done myself) but the manor in which you're cajoling each other to jeer and wish ruin on ordinary people is something I detest. In particular one account that was set up to exclusively do so, and another account who is supposedly here because they have a beef with one person yet who is increasingly twisted baiting towards all. Then you have another two or three who may not use the same type of language but they support them or uptick them using them as their attack dogs whilst maintaining entirely different persona's elsewhere. Sick.

The people who spend time on this board telling us posters have no influence on others or on the markets, telling us that one poster has very likely influenced someone else that has detrimentally affected the market. They posted this on the board to say so. Just to influence someone (which is impossible because no one on here influences anyone according to them). When I type this it sounds completely ridiculous but it is someone's reality. Unfortunately and incredibly this stuff is left for us to sift through rather than being actively moderated. Just incredible. Utterly and laughably incredible 😂🤣

I think that is a fair point Packinsome. It's been on my mind for a while. Whatever the potential here (which is now backed up by the strength of being an operational miner) there's been a lot more at play suppressing this I believe. You are right that AIM is problematic for many companies in this climate and we aren't the only ones to be underpeforming. The confluence of Newmont issues, change of JV partner, subsequent negotiation, worldwide uncertainty (which has no sign of let up any time soon) and both PI and institutional wariness about risk have I believe held this back. Whilst I've reluctantly accepted that this is now a long game for those of us that were on the Havieron ticket and that the accretive nature of this share is still there, you can see it on SD's face the bewilderment as to why the SP is still where it is. I think we have to revise a lot of expectations and timescale until such time as sentiment is back.

GGP is however a survivor in a field where others are at the mercy of lender/investors that fail to materialise. The fact that we may not even need the loan facilities on offer from our backers is a sign that we are on firm ground. Timing is the issue for some of us ageing folk though. I feel large sums of my cash has been tied up an awful long time going nowhere and "accretive" normally means seeing some gain trickling through. But not as of yet and that word rings quite hollow for now. I am watching and waiting but if resource updates and/or the ASX doesn't shift things along then I will with not just a little regret move on. Not with big losses but with not really enough gain unfortunately. Paper gain but inflationary loss perhaps. Not a disaster as one or two other things have done well for me, but I'm struggling to observe the life changing sea change others keep saying is there. 6 months may change my mind but I'm kicking the can for the last time. Some will be pleased at that

Thanks. Thunderstorms, thunderstorms, rain. Got it. Your job is done. Congratulations again. With nothing now left to do then do put energy into your actual investments which I'm sure will be nothing but 🌞🌞🌡️ (according to yourself with the power of hindsight that is)

If you're to be believed R88 you doubted the share then celebrated it then bought it then miraculously sold at the top! Well done. But now you're out you can shuffle off. As for the other regular armageddon crew. Every single post is to try to sow doubt. Why? It's despicable really when some of them are legitimately invested elsewhere, sitting on p*ss poor performances putting a glossy spin on everything. But those who dare to sow any doubt on their investments get lynched. Sordid goings on where they seek pleasure in the hope that other people's investments will tank. What type of mindset is that? Surely it's born of inadequacy? You would just leave other people to it wouldn't you if you have no skin in the game?

You answered from the wrong account. Live in your head rent free

I'm just pleased to see an honest debate based on the prospects. Those who portray this company as fraudulent fail to read rns's going back over several years with real progress in evidence. Thanks for keeping it real. More of this and less of the cr@p that hijacks proper debate.