Member Info for chris100

An offer from 'Diversity'. VIS wanting 22p, one board member 30p. Ken thinks the company worth is a fair bit less. The board is divided on value.

'Tim Truthfull's' post appears to have been deleted!

haha

Don't know who this 'Tim trutful' is, but nonetheless his comment (at the bottom, posted today) is interesting

http://www.safestocks.co.uk/2018/07/12/understanding-management-priorities-on-price/

try again 'awards' !

'performance wards' I mean. Doh

Most of those shares are 'performance ward's' which to some on here are a euphemism for freebies. The execs are well remunerated already so it is a little bit hard to swallow tbh.

There's 11 bids for DMS, at various stages, on the Veoneer presentation from Jan - only 2 of which have been won. I doubt SM would have hired so many new engineering staff, which in part required the fund raise, if they didn't think they'd win plenty more business. Smarteye don't appear to have done the same, yet if they're to be successful they'll need more engineering staff per head than SEE because they don't have a silicon solution.

The shares awards yesterday have hacked people off and understandably so imo. I don't think it was very well timed.

Also, look out for the people on here who only turn up here when the mood is low. I suspect some of them aren't even invested.

The rest of the shares at 'no par value'.

They need to bring the bacon home on these RFQs!

I think that's 410,337 of the circa 4 million at 6.75p? Unless I've misunderstood the RNS

I wouldn't begrudge it if the SP was substantially higher. But it's not. If there's a positive it's that Nick's taking part in the fund raise looks even better given that he is also receiving share awards from the company.

I just hope SEE clean up on those 13 RFQs and what should be a final raise in say 18 months is done at a substantially higher price!

Brexit and trade wars the reason for low ball placing? Those chestnuts again. Lame imo.

Interesting audio clip. Traction has failed to occur in rail yet there's a gaping hole here for the SM solution and I suspect things are slowly moving in that direction.

https://www.wabe.org/georgia-legislature-considers-railroad-safety-bill/

A ruse to get Panmure clients in on the cheap?

https://www.fleetnews.co.uk/news/fleet-industry-news/2019/03/20/handheld-mobile-phone-use-at-the-wheel-getting-worse

https://www.mixtelematics.com.au/blog/manage-driver-hours-using-fatigue-monitoring-technology

Two of the VSI directors have chosen to increase their personal holdings by I think 5 and 10 million shares respectively. It's no small number of shares and so they must surely believe in the company to do this.

Of course SEE have also been working with Volvo Trucks very recently:-

https://www.seeingmachines.com/humanfactors/astc/

LIF - It's not just premium cars SEE will go in to, as pointed by Mike Lenne here

http://www.ai-online.com/Adv/Previous/show_issue.php?id=7882#sthash.IDbJFD2l.dpbs

Also, I think SEE must surely be in pole position for services the coming regulatory requirements for DMS in the truck market, considering they've been doing this for years.