Member Info for Chaebol

No you asked me if the stays were dismissed what then massi, this is why i go into low iq takes because it is just dumb whta you do tbh.

I beleive the verdict was given yday hence the short virtual hearing done by video. Janice was the one that filed the hearing so im guessing she had made her decision from the 14th May hearings in chambers. If she hadnt come to a conclusion, im guessing she would have called them to chambers for further info/evidence..........

I bleieve the spa clauses will be enough to saty it back to arb and I also beleive if they had been dismissed yesterday GST would have RNS'd that yesterday. So i think back to arb rns is coming next week 2nd to 4th June.

Bake GS20 Dead

Angr hasnt answered the phone since 22nd April ring ring ring doesnt even have answerphone.

Sement in court

Gs money website under construction for 5 years

https://gsmoneyweb.caliber.com.sg/about-us.php

SO you boys are 4 months in to high court writ and zheng zhu not even filed a defence yet

AI Google it this is law

Yes, filing a substantive Defence in the High Court would invalidate their ability to secure a stay of the court proceedings in favour of arbitration.

Under common law jurisdictions governing High Court procedures (such as Singapore's Arbitration Acts), filing a Defence constitutes "taking a step in the proceedings" to answer the substantive merits of the claim.

Doing so waives the right to arbitrate and submits the party to the jurisdiction of the court.

Key Legal Mechanics

Taking a "Step in Proceedings": Under standard arbitration statutory frameworks (such as Section 9(3) of the UK Arbitration Act or Section 6 of Singapore’s Arbitration Act), a party loses their statutory right to apply for a court stay if they take an action that implicitly acknowledges and accepts the court's jurisdiction to resolve the core dispute.The Nature of a Defence: A Defence is the ultimate procedural step answering a substantive claim. It forces the court to look at the facts and legal merits of the dispute rather than its jurisdiction.Waiver of the Arbitration Clause: By asking a High Court judge to rule on the merits outlined in a Defence, Zheng and Zhu would legally waive their contractual right to resolve that specific dispute via arbitration (e.g., SIAC or LCIA

No zheng and zhu would not file a defence in the high court as that would be a step in the proceedings and would mean they cannot file stay back to arb.

If stay gets dismissed, they will then finally file their high court defence with possible counter claims, if it is dismissed I think they appeal it and they can have that appealed in front of a judge, Janice is not a judge. That would be another month of procedure and they might get overturned if that is the reality.

Take a look at the arb med arb protocol. Ive tried to tell you look at the process.

Deep discovery takes place after failed mediation. What happeend after failed mediation here?

High court lol

I thought it would go back to ARB the day they announced court writ feb 13th and now GST narrowed the claim to law of confidence to avoid arb issues being heard in the stay hearing, I think its nailed on for zheng zhu to get the stay.

Not sure what they do about Chong but common sense would say she gets case managements stay.

Sorry, they file their defence with potential counter claims.

The stay applications prevented them from filing defence or counter claims or that would have acknowledged the high court writ as a 'step in the proceedings' and would have invalidated the stay apps from Zheng Zhu

Well if their stays are dismissed I think they appeal to judge on that, and then file potential counter claims and after that, it can finally go to deep discovery.

Zheng Zhu Chong seem up for a big fight and if smoking gun evidence was apparent I think Zheng Zhu would have already settled, this is going on for 1 year now in July.

FWIW its national holiday today in Singapore.

Sensible people understand Janice held the summons stays and gave the verdict by video yday and that Sim Junhui is the justice officer for case conference hearings (OC)

Every filing explains it simply for you, one hearing was held via virtual on the 26th May the rest were in chambers as filed.

https://www.judiciary.gov.sg/hearing-list trype sement and then oyu will see how the filings were heard what they represented ie stays or Case conference etc, this si not difficult to see and understand. So no they were not hel all by video, the filings confirm this b

04 Jun 2026, 10:30 AM HC/OC 143/2026

Case Conference (OC)

SEMNET PTE. LTD. v CHOO SEET EE (ZHU XUE' ER) & 2 Ors

Venue

Supreme Court, Chamber 2-1

Judge/Judicial officer

Assistant Registrar Sim Junhui

26 May 2026, 10:00 AM HC/OC 143/2026

(HC/SUM 1210/2026)

OA & Summons - General

SEMNET PTE. LTD. v CHOO SEET EE (ZHU XUE' ER) & 2 Ors

Venue

Supreme Court, Virtual Venue

Judge/Judicial officer

Assistant Registrar Wong Shi Hui Janice

26 May 2026, 10:00 AM HC/OC 143/2026

(HC/SUM 1211/2026)

OA & Summons - General

SEMNET PTE. LTD. v CHOO SEET EE (ZHU XUE' ER) & 2 Ors

Venue

Supreme Court, Virtual Venue

Judge/Judicial officer

Assistant Registrar Wong Shi Hui Janice

14 May 2026, 2:30 PM HC/OC 143/2026

(HC/SUM 1210/2026)

OA & Summons - General

SEMNET PTE. LTD. v CHOO SEET EE (ZHU XUE' ER) & 2 Ors

Venue

Supreme Court, CHAMBER 3F

Judge/Judicial officer

Assistant Registrar Wong Shi Hui Janice

14 May 2026, 2:30 PM HC/OC 143/2026

(HC/SUM 1211/2026)

OA & Summons - General

SEMNET PTE. LTD. v CHOO SEET EE (ZHU XUE' ER) & 2 Ors

Venue

Supreme Court, CHAMBER 3F

Judge/Judicial officer

Assistant Registrar Wong Shi Hui Janice

Afte your deranged takes form the last stuff, not posting on here, could you get into your low iq skull I will swap Ray with you happy to on the .2 and .3's same applies to billys fantasy 150 million, otherwise, please stop this low IQ repetitiveness, its so dull.

Step in the proceedings is clearly over your head Ray like a lot of things, clearly.

NO bill its real simple just arb med arb protocol that is it.

Take a look into it, The whole point of Arb-Med-Arb is to attempt settlement early and cheaply, before parties spend a lot of money and time on heavy discovery and preparation. Mediation uses the initial exchanged documents (Notice + Response) plus whatever parties voluntarily disclose. Only if it fails do you go into the full, more expensive discovery phase in arbitration.

"Deep discovery" (extensive document production and evidence gathering) is a feature of the arbitration phase, not the mediation phase. In some custom Arb-Med-Arb setups, parties might agree to more disclosure before mediation, but under the standard protocol it's deliberately kept light at the start.

Deep discovery takes place after failed mediation.

Wow....Il try and stay kind as huge pain is coming here.........What have I been saying since the Sement (sic) update was announced since feb 13?

I was told I didnt have a clue when I said on the 13 th February this will go back to arbitration, as GST cannot just move the venue because they dont like it, I was accused of being stupid etc, 4 months later on the 26th May , Janice delivered a verdict on whether it gets stayed or not, bill bfd many told me they couldnt file a stay for arbitration because zheng zhu rejected arbitration, lol

4 months wasted if it goes back to arb and lots more cash.

But i wasnt shouting at people on here all day Ray, I can clearly see what each filing represents even though its a shambles from you lot. Lol try and call Angra tomorrow, ring ring not even an answerphone service. No update to the ps25 rules so its not even near EMI compliance, thats going as well soon, ring ring ring ring

Pro neobankers x;)

said many months ago bake and Mica has big problems so does EMI and angra, its gettng to the point where the whole thing looks pointless Ray.

What you on about now posted what after?

Stay definitely, that would be awful for GST, its late morning where i am 27th...So been up for a few now x

Would have to pay zheng zhu chongs costs for the stays and pay big sums to up the claim in ARB, I think they would throw in the towel at some stage soon, pressuring the defendents publicly with high court writ has not worked.

4 months in and back to arb would be very poor for GST.

Lol okay Bill, you're soon going to realise that mediation is not arbitration — it is simply a tool within the Arb-Med-Arb protocol.

Mediation is confidential. The only time it can be used against you is if you lose the case and in assessing courts costs if you came across as unreasonable or difficult during the mediation negotiations then it can be used However under the Arb-Med-Arb protocol, the Mediation Act protects the rights of the individuals involved.

That cheerio bake was up on telegram early am its amazing what you guys don’t catch

No AI needed. x