Member Info for Chaebol

30k ish up May 1 to 9th May

Typo correction

30k ish May 1 to May 7th x;)

No, I didn’t “scare myself out of the boat”.

For 10 months straight I’ve had to listen to the same brain-dead bagholder cope “Gift steal”, “Yum yum”, “Cheap train”, “Don’t miss it bro”, etc.

Meanwhile the company sits in total limbo, refuses to give proper updates, and the only consistent thing is the same low-quality rubbish GST continue to serve up.

I’m not scared. I’m just not stupid enough to keep buying the same recycled manipulation hoping “this time is different”.

Missing the boat isn’t isn’t this. Missing the boat is repeatedly jumping into these awful pumps with zero real news, getting dumped on, and then saying weeks later saying .2 is an excellent buying opportunity.

I’ll happily admit I was wrong the day they actually release something substantial with real substance. Until then, spare me the emotional “don’t miss the boat” nonsense.

I’ve watched this same ferry make the same pointless trip for nearly a year.

Thats your afternoon here

15-May-26 16:10:27 0.3999 10 Buy* 0.30 0.40 0.04 O

15-May-26 15:36:41 0.3724 22,000 Buy* 0.30 0.40 81.93 O

15-May-26 14:35:40 0.3999 12,000 Buy* 0.30 0.40 47.99 O

15-May-26 14:13:14 0.3999 10 Buy* 0.30 0.40 0.04 O

This company cant sustain rises with RNS's and now the agenda is to believe a rise with no news is not manipulated rubbish.

Rightio bill.

Volume April 272k

30k ish up May 1 to 9th May

Last few days of March lots of sales but giving that with May 8th an ambitious 200k

Now youre gonna tell me most of it was all buys. X;)

Polish President Karol Nawrocki has not vetoed absolutely everything, but he has used his veto power aggressively to block almost all major, high-profile legislative reforms introduced by Prime Minister Donald Tusk’s government.

The sheer volume of vetoes is historic when compared to previous Polish heads of state

* The 6-Month Milestone: By March 2026, less than a year into his term (which began in August 2025), Nawrocki had already issued 28 vetoes.

* Beating Predecessors: In just his first few months, Nawrocki surpassed the 19 vetoes that his predecessor, Andrzej Duda, issued across his entire ten-year presidency.

* All-Time Record, He is on track to eclipse modern Poland's all-time veto record-holder, Aleksander Kwaśniewski, who used the power 35 times over a decade.

With Zondacrypto chaos, President is in a tough spot, no remarks from his office which I find quite telling ie no veto will be issued, lets see, KNF has 6 weeks to align itself in time.

GST must be panicking x;)

I was there for that as well......

https://x.com/ChaebolChris/status/1875896337855873186

Funny fact, not that I would.....But Could buy in all week and still have a lower average than all of you

Needs news to back it up, really simple.

The strongest pump phase was 8 May. We are now 7 days later and already seeing distribution signs + pullback. This fits the average window where these moves start rolling over.

Key Warning Signs That the Top Is In (or Near)

1. Micro-propping slows down

* Fewer tiny buys at 4p

* The “real spread” becomes wider and more visible (what you’re seeing now)

2. Volume remains high but price fails to hold gains

* Lots of shares traded but price closes lower (like 14 May)

3. Large sells at lower prices continue

* While last price is propped, big blocks keep printing lower

4. No positive RNS after the spike

* Very bearish. They usually drop news quickly if it’s good.

5. Price struggles at round numbers

* Repeated failure to hold 0.40p cleanly

6. Sudden increase in “quiet” periods during the day with very little volume

What Usually Happens Next (Realistic Scenarios)

* Most common: Price drifts lower over the next 1–3 weeks on low volume, then they announce a placing. Stock gaps down 30-50% on the news.

* Aggressive scenario: One more attempt at a spike (another sints day) to try squeeze more retail in, then final distribution.

* Best case (rare): Genuine positive news arrives and it holds. But with current silence on the court case, this looks unlikely.

Bottom line

These manipulated pumps in stocks like GST usually last 1–3 weeks from the big volume spike before the serious decline begins. We are currently right at the dangerous transition point.

The people who engineered this have likely already sold a large portion of what they wanted to. Retail who bought this recent top are now holding another bag imo.

Accumulation / Setup

Duration: Days to weeks

What happens: Quiet buying, building a position cheaply.

GST.L status: 8th May.

The Pump Phase

Duration: 3 – 10 trading days

What happens: Tape painting, sints, repeated micro-buys, sudden volume spikes and big percentage gains.

GST.L status: 8 May – 13 May (peak).

Distribution Phase

Duration: 2 – 8 trading days

What happens: Big holders sell into the FOMO. Price holds or grinds higher on low-quality tape.

GST.L status: 12 May – 14 May.

The Fade / Collapse

Duration: Starts 1–10 days after the peak

What happens: Artificial support is removed → sharp drops, often 30-70%+ losses for late buyers.

GST.L status: Just beginning.

Grind Lower

Duration: Weeks to months

What happens: Repeated small pumps, heavy dilution, and slow death by a thousand cuts.

GST.L status: Soon. x;)

President still has to approve it.

Youre welcome x

Https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/polish-lawmakers-adopt-crypto-regulation-amid-multi-million-dollar-fraud-probe-2026-05-15/

Semnet high court writ and its suspended crypto services RNS's had nothing to do with the drop then? I see huge drops from those RNS's its logical.

The lack of comms since Decemebr has nothing to do with poor sentiment and volume ?

Bu this rise with no news and heavy tape manipulation is ok ?

I think you're clarifying my point better than I can explain it now.

Its been explained in the message I just posted, Im trying to stay polite Ray, read it again ?

Yes Ray because 120 SINTS printing in the same second is totally normal behaviour here lol

Yes, I have called certain people low IQ and I’ll stand by the context.

After I went directly to specialist lawyers and the Bank of Lithuania (the regulator overseeing MiCA in Lithuania) and shared the detailed, accurate information they gave me about GS Fintech UAB’s licensing status and the hard 31 December 2025 deadline, the overwhelming response from you and many others was

* Accusations that I was lying

* Claims I was spreading FUD

* Dismissal of primary source regulatory information

*

Months later, the company itself confirmed exactly what I reported they failed to secure MiCA authorisation in Lithuania, had to suspend crypto trading services, and issued the RNS that validated the information you all attacked me for bringing forward.

So when people continue to ignore regulatory reality and instead hype propped tape patterns, sints, and micro-buys as signs of “strong demand” yes — I lose patience and call it low IQ behaviour. It’s not an insult to general intelligence. It’s frustration at wilful ignorance in the face of clear evidence.

What separates us is simple

* I do primary research (regulator + lawyers) and update my view when facts change.

* You (and others) dismissed the facts, attacked the messenger, and kept pushing hopium based on hopium.

That’s the difference.

I’d rather be called rude for being right than polite for being wrong.

We’re closer, but the distinction you’re making still misses the core issue in illiquid Main Market microcaps like this.

I’ve never claimed the entire market is “completely fake” or that every share traded is fictional. There are real buyers and sellers. The problem is how the visible presentation (last price, perceived momentum, and volume spikes) is being systematically engineered with disproportionately small effort.

However the last price and headline volume that retail sees were being propped and inflated using tiny, low-cost trades. In a stock with a persistently wide spread and tiny natural liquidity, this small intervention has an outsized impact on perception.

That’s not “messy speculative trading with some cosmetic elements.”

That’s tape painting + artificial volume creation. The cosmetics aren’t incidental, they’re the tool used to obscure the underlying supply/demand reality.

No RNS around that period supported any positive catalyst or negative, ie fundraising, yet lol.

The most recent corporate news was the March crypto trading suspension (negative). So the “FOMO + genuine demand” narrative relies heavily on the engineered tape.

The underlying demand exists but appears weaker than the chart suggests. The sints and micro-propping don’t create all the buying, but they exaggerate its visibility and strength.

That distinction is exactly why these patterns are viewed as manipulative under Market Abuse Regulation, even if some real participants are involved.

The tape isn’t 100% fictional, but it’s also not a clean reflection of organic market forces

Why do you keep mentioning AIM?

You can call this “genuine speculative demand + some cosmetic activity” if you want.

The data shows manufactured optics on top of real selling pressure, with the visible price and volume being engineered using minimal capital. That’s precisely how tape painting works in low-float microcaps.

The bid didn’t collapse to 0.33 and stay there because someone is actively supporting the price with the micro buys and sint bursts.

Without that support, the last price and chart would look very different.

That’s not “the market finding buyers” in a pure sense, it’s selective intervention at key levels.

Interpreting the propped tape as organic strength while ignoring the mechanics is the real stretch here.I’m not saying every single trade is fake.

I’m saying the presentation of demand and volume is being cosmetically enhanced, and that distinction matters for anyone trading this stock.

But when the price action itself shows clear signs of manufactured optics (micro-propping + sint bursts) rather than broad, natural accumulation, it's reasonable to call it what it is cosmetic manipulation of the tape.

This doesn't mean every buyer is fake, it means the appearance of strength is being engineered, which misleads retail participants. The probability that 100+ trades printing in the exact same second + repeated 10-share propping trades in a stock with a wide 0.30–0.40p spread are purely organic is extremely low.

Genuine large buyers don't need to hide behind these tactics. The market will react to real news when (if) it comes. Until then, the tape tells its own story.

The data isn't ambiguous here ,

let's stick to the actual tape from 14 May Dozens of trades over 100 all printed at the exact same timestamp (12:28:05) — this is the definition of "sints." In a genuinely liquid, organic market you don't get 200,000+ shares across dozens of separate orders hitting the tape in one single second, neatly split between the bid and ask. That's not normal two-way interest; it's coordinated volume creation.

Repeated 10-share buys at 0.3999p throughout the afternoon (costing pennies each) to hold the last traded price near the 0.40p level, while millions of shares were sold at materially lower prices (e.g. 1.36M at 0.3311p and 2.41M at 0.3515p).

This is textbook tape painting + artificial volume. The large blocks show real selling pressure, but the visible last price and headline volume are being propped and inflated with minimal capital. That's exactly how these patterns work in illiquid microcaps.