Member Info for Chaebol

Semnet high court writ and its suspended crypto services RNS's had nothing to do with the drop then? I see huge drops from those RNS's its logical.

The lack of comms since Decemebr has nothing to do with poor sentiment and volume ?

Bu this rise with no news and heavy tape manipulation is ok ?

I think you're clarifying my point better than I can explain it now.

Its been explained in the message I just posted, Im trying to stay polite Ray, read it again ?

Yes Ray because 120 SINTS printing in the same second is totally normal behaviour here lol

Yes, I have called certain people low IQ and I’ll stand by the context.

After I went directly to specialist lawyers and the Bank of Lithuania (the regulator overseeing MiCA in Lithuania) and shared the detailed, accurate information they gave me about GS Fintech UAB’s licensing status and the hard 31 December 2025 deadline, the overwhelming response from you and many others was

* Accusations that I was lying

* Claims I was spreading FUD

* Dismissal of primary source regulatory information

*

Months later, the company itself confirmed exactly what I reported they failed to secure MiCA authorisation in Lithuania, had to suspend crypto trading services, and issued the RNS that validated the information you all attacked me for bringing forward.

So when people continue to ignore regulatory reality and instead hype propped tape patterns, sints, and micro-buys as signs of “strong demand” yes — I lose patience and call it low IQ behaviour. It’s not an insult to general intelligence. It’s frustration at wilful ignorance in the face of clear evidence.

What separates us is simple

* I do primary research (regulator + lawyers) and update my view when facts change.

* You (and others) dismissed the facts, attacked the messenger, and kept pushing hopium based on hopium.

That’s the difference.

I’d rather be called rude for being right than polite for being wrong.

We’re closer, but the distinction you’re making still misses the core issue in illiquid Main Market microcaps like this.

I’ve never claimed the entire market is “completely fake” or that every share traded is fictional. There are real buyers and sellers. The problem is how the visible presentation (last price, perceived momentum, and volume spikes) is being systematically engineered with disproportionately small effort.

However the last price and headline volume that retail sees were being propped and inflated using tiny, low-cost trades. In a stock with a persistently wide spread and tiny natural liquidity, this small intervention has an outsized impact on perception.

That’s not “messy speculative trading with some cosmetic elements.”

That’s tape painting + artificial volume creation. The cosmetics aren’t incidental, they’re the tool used to obscure the underlying supply/demand reality.

No RNS around that period supported any positive catalyst or negative, ie fundraising, yet lol.

The most recent corporate news was the March crypto trading suspension (negative). So the “FOMO + genuine demand” narrative relies heavily on the engineered tape.

The underlying demand exists but appears weaker than the chart suggests. The sints and micro-propping don’t create all the buying, but they exaggerate its visibility and strength.

That distinction is exactly why these patterns are viewed as manipulative under Market Abuse Regulation, even if some real participants are involved.

The tape isn’t 100% fictional, but it’s also not a clean reflection of organic market forces

Why do you keep mentioning AIM?

You can call this “genuine speculative demand + some cosmetic activity” if you want.

The data shows manufactured optics on top of real selling pressure, with the visible price and volume being engineered using minimal capital. That’s precisely how tape painting works in low-float microcaps.

The bid didn’t collapse to 0.33 and stay there because someone is actively supporting the price with the micro buys and sint bursts.

Without that support, the last price and chart would look very different.

That’s not “the market finding buyers” in a pure sense, it’s selective intervention at key levels.

Interpreting the propped tape as organic strength while ignoring the mechanics is the real stretch here.I’m not saying every single trade is fake.

I’m saying the presentation of demand and volume is being cosmetically enhanced, and that distinction matters for anyone trading this stock.

But when the price action itself shows clear signs of manufactured optics (micro-propping + sint bursts) rather than broad, natural accumulation, it's reasonable to call it what it is cosmetic manipulation of the tape.

This doesn't mean every buyer is fake, it means the appearance of strength is being engineered, which misleads retail participants. The probability that 100+ trades printing in the exact same second + repeated 10-share propping trades in a stock with a wide 0.30–0.40p spread are purely organic is extremely low.

Genuine large buyers don't need to hide behind these tactics. The market will react to real news when (if) it comes. Until then, the tape tells its own story.

The data isn't ambiguous here ,

let's stick to the actual tape from 14 May Dozens of trades over 100 all printed at the exact same timestamp (12:28:05) — this is the definition of "sints." In a genuinely liquid, organic market you don't get 200,000+ shares across dozens of separate orders hitting the tape in one single second, neatly split between the bid and ask. That's not normal two-way interest; it's coordinated volume creation.

Repeated 10-share buys at 0.3999p throughout the afternoon (costing pennies each) to hold the last traded price near the 0.40p level, while millions of shares were sold at materially lower prices (e.g. 1.36M at 0.3311p and 2.41M at 0.3515p).

This is textbook tape painting + artificial volume. The large blocks show real selling pressure, but the visible last price and headline volume are being propped and inflated with minimal capital. That's exactly how these patterns work in illiquid microcaps.

Bull v Bear eh ?

128 sints v 28 trades

Logic v Bias ?

I think its all staring us in the face wiht this firm but ive been saying that for eons now. Time will always tell in the end.

You getting an RNS today ?

Raise or Stay?

'And with respect, counting “SINTs vs market trades” on its own doesn’t really prove manipulation either. In low liquidity AIM stocks, tiny prints happen constantly because the market structure itself is fragmented and noisy.'

Are you saying this is on AIM now ?

Multiple examples of manipulation

Monday afternoon a good one. The tape is easy to see.

16:20:14 check the sints from there. Multiple examples of this being totally manipulated since Friday.

No news should be ringing alarm bells for most now.

You have multiple examples of yesterday throughout the week. I think its easy to see its been manipulated especially the firm not issuing any update to support all this.

Fomo that could have bought at .2 bought in the manipulation at far higher prices. This needed news not this SINT and tiny prints to prop it all week.

Yesterday was 120 sints v 28 market trades. The SP is being propped up by manipulative means and that to me looks obvious.

Yes its my opinion. Just like you have yours.

But if this was organic niceness, you wouldnt have all the tiny prints nor the clusters of SINTS this has had since Friday.

These are decent clues tbf.

Its 1 of 3 things imo Ray,

Either a raise or a very large seller dumping very intelligently. Or a pro broker team rinsing this because they could.

The fomo buyers gamblers/punters got seduced into it and added to the hype.

Anyway, Lets hope bill understands the 4 p trades now

Its obvious that this is being manipulated Ray from Friday.

Fomo buyers bought in Ray ill never under estimate fomo buyers, but at the end of the day rises like this need to be supported it wasnt and every trading day has examples of this manipulation like yesterday afternoon.

Important Context

In a genuine, organic market for a small company like GST.L, you would not normally see hundreds of sints printing like this, trades printing in the exact same second followed by repeated micro-buys to hold the closing price.

These patterns are common in illiquid microcap stocks and are classic signs of tape painting and volume inflation, techniques designed to mislead the broader market about real supply and demand.

Under UK Market Abuse Regulation (MAR), creating a false or misleading impression of supply, demand, or price is prohibited. However, proving intent with small trades and clusters in low-volume names is difficult, so these patterns often continue unchecked.

Bottom line: If these sints and micro-propping trades are coordinated rather than natural order flow, they represent a form of manipulation that primarily benefits those unloading shares into the induced interest, at the expense of retail traders chasing the apparent momentum.

"Sints" refer to large clusters of trades that all execute and print on the tape at the exact same timestamp. In normal trading, especially in a liquid stock, trades usually spread out over seconds with natural variation in timing.

When dozens of buys and sells hit the tape simultaneously at two specific price levels (here 0.35p and 0.40p), it is highly unusual and often viewed as artificial. Creating fake volume illusion, By generating hundreds of thousands of shares in volume in just one second, it makes the stock appear far more actively traded than it naturally is. Retail traders and scanners often chase "volume spikes," so this can draw in new buyers.

Cross-matching / matched orders, In low-liquidity stocks, coordinated parties (or a single entity using multiple accounts/brokers) can arrange buys and sells to hit at the same moment. This is sometimes called wash trading or pre-arranged trading — buying and selling between related accounts to inflate volume without real change in ownership.

Notice the trades are concentrated exactly at the bid and ask. This can help maintain a wide but controlled spread while creating the appearance of active two-way interest.

Combined with afternoon propping, Earlier in the day they create artificial volume with sints, then later use tiny 10-share buys at 0.3999p to paint the tape and hold the last price near 0.40p despite large sells hitting lower levels. Together, these tactics give the illusion of strong demand and healthy trading activity.

Why it's manipulative (and risky for you)

* It distorts true supply/demand. The real market wants to trade lower (evidenced by the big sells at 0.33x), but small propped buys hide that.

* It's often part of a broader "pump" where insiders/promoters with cheap shares offload into retail buying. Classic pump-and-dump pattern in these micro cap stocks.

This pattern is manipulative if the intent is to mislead the market about genuine supply/demand. It's cheaper and easier in illiquid names regardless of the exchange tier. Similar tactics have been investigated on LSE before in microcaps.

Treat this as high-risk speculation, not investing. The propping can stop abruptly (or reverse when sellers overwhelm), leading to sharp drops.

Watch

* Actual volume-weighted average price (VWAP) vs. the last price.

* Order book depth (level 2) — thin books make this trivial.

* Consistent patterns over multiple days.

* Company news/fundamentals (dilution, cash burn, etc. are common in these).

If you suspect ongoing abuse, you can report to the FCA, but individual small trades rarely trigger action without broader evidence. Stay cautious — the tape in stocks like this is often not trustworthy.

How this manipulation works ("tape painting")

1. Create false appearance of demand, In low-volume stocks, even tiny trades can influence the last sale price that many platforms, charts, and scanners display. A few 10-share buys at the ask (or above) can "paint" the tape green repeatedly, especially near the close ("marking the close" is a related tactic).

2. Attract retail or momentum watchers, People scanning for "unusual volume," "green candles," or "buying pressure" see the propped price and small prints as bullish. Algorithms or retail traders pile in, providing real liquidity for the manipulator to sell into.

3. Control the close / key levels: The 430PM tape paint timing (or end of session) is deliberate — closing prices matter.

4. Asymmetric execution, Larger sells can be absorbed or routed differently, while the propping buys are aggressive small prints visible on the tape. The manipulator(s) might be using multiple accounts, brokers, or coordinated parties (wash trading elements if crossing with themselves).