Member Info for Chaebol

Its normal.

Im waiting for the updates to happen and yeh will post as soon as i see the amendments or changes.

Last 2 filings have no updates since the 20th May, think we will see updates 1st or 2nd june on how the last filings updated etc.

This hearing information was last updated on 20 May 2026, 7:36 PM.This hearing information was last updated on 20 May 2026, 6:15 PM

Https://www.judiciary.gov.sg/hearing-list/hearing-list-details/ds-1-666991 June 4th OC will be vacated if the case is stayed on the 26th May

https://www.judiciary.gov.sg/hearing-list/hearing-list-details/ds-1-673181 Virtual hearing 26th May. Verdict on stay being upheld or dismissed.

https://www.judiciary.gov.sg/hearing-list/hearing-list-details/ds-1-673182 Virtual hearing 26th May. Verdict on stay being upheld or dismissed.

https://www.judiciary.gov.sg/hearing-list/hearing-list-details/ds-1-669341 Summons heard 14th May for stay of whole action. Judgement reserved until 26th May

https://www.judiciary.gov.sg/hearing-list/hearing-list-details/ds-1-669343 Summons Heard 14th May for stay of proceedings Chong. Judgment reserved for 26th May

Look into arb med arb protocol.

We dont know what terms they were trying to place on zheng zhu, and how restrictive they could have been in the mediation, all we know is GST came up with huge expressed optimism on an outlined agreement in mediation, that failed. It means nothing ! We dont know if zheng zhu rejected mediation or in bfds muddled brain rejected arb. We just know that no agreement was made.

They misled the market with bake reapplying in LT they misled the market wiht finferno eu expansion, thats gone in 5 weeks that vasp.

stablecoins gs money etc etc

So GST have form for expressing huge optimism in RNS's that go nowhere.

A ruling at arbitration found in GST's favour Chaebol, most people would describe that as the two former directors losing

Thats incorrect bfd nothing was found in GST favour. They failed to reach mediation success, do you know why mediation failed?

Ive already answered , if its dismissed thats good news for GST. Didnt say it needs to be rns'd

but when you consider they have used fake promotions of its company to try and ramp the price last 6 months wiht total bs, a court ruling confirming they have won this stay is a big battle and is news worthy will create interest etc. Thats why I beleive they would RNS it.

No its simple logic, sense and law, GST are not going to create an RNS from an oral verdict hearing. They have to Wait for the wording this is common sense. LAwyers gonna say to client what the result is but before oyu share wiht market let me get the sealed worded docs. lol Is it getting this stupid here now ?

ARBITRATION HAS NOT BEEN LOST BFD.

If it had they wouldnt be satyaing to go bank to arb.

Standard The lawyer will tell the client what happend duing the virtual hearing but will explicitly warn the client: "This is the oral outcome; we must not take definitive corporate action or make final market statements until we read the exact wording of the written grounds or formal order." Thats Why the Lawyer Must Wait for the "Worded Docs"

Complete wordings are important and may not be completely relayed during the virtual hearing

Yes but takes 1-3 days for lawyers to receive sealed docs from court and then GST transfer that to RNS i think june 2 to june 4 we get the news.

National holiday in Singapore so maybe longer.

Change of venue will need to be rns'd

This continuing in court and not going back to arb is good news for GST and investors, they tried to bs a expected mediated settlement with hopium rubbish so if they had got the stays dismissed im sure they would rns it. Theyre desperate to release fake hopium news a court ruling winning would be a great advantage for GST semnet in this battle.

No you asked me if the stays were dismissed what then massi, this is why i go into low iq takes because it is just dumb whta you do tbh.

I beleive the verdict was given yday hence the short virtual hearing done by video. Janice was the one that filed the hearing so im guessing she had made her decision from the 14th May hearings in chambers. If she hadnt come to a conclusion, im guessing she would have called them to chambers for further info/evidence..........

I bleieve the spa clauses will be enough to saty it back to arb and I also beleive if they had been dismissed yesterday GST would have RNS'd that yesterday. So i think back to arb rns is coming next week 2nd to 4th June.

Bake GS20 Dead

Angr hasnt answered the phone since 22nd April ring ring ring doesnt even have answerphone.

Sement in court

Gs money website under construction for 5 years

https://gsmoneyweb.caliber.com.sg/about-us.php

SO you boys are 4 months in to high court writ and zheng zhu not even filed a defence yet

AI Google it this is law

Yes, filing a substantive Defence in the High Court would invalidate their ability to secure a stay of the court proceedings in favour of arbitration.

Under common law jurisdictions governing High Court procedures (such as Singapore's Arbitration Acts), filing a Defence constitutes "taking a step in the proceedings" to answer the substantive merits of the claim.

Doing so waives the right to arbitrate and submits the party to the jurisdiction of the court.

Key Legal Mechanics

Taking a "Step in Proceedings": Under standard arbitration statutory frameworks (such as Section 9(3) of the UK Arbitration Act or Section 6 of Singapore’s Arbitration Act), a party loses their statutory right to apply for a court stay if they take an action that implicitly acknowledges and accepts the court's jurisdiction to resolve the core dispute.The Nature of a Defence: A Defence is the ultimate procedural step answering a substantive claim. It forces the court to look at the facts and legal merits of the dispute rather than its jurisdiction.Waiver of the Arbitration Clause: By asking a High Court judge to rule on the merits outlined in a Defence, Zheng and Zhu would legally waive their contractual right to resolve that specific dispute via arbitration (e.g., SIAC or LCIA

No zheng and zhu would not file a defence in the high court as that would be a step in the proceedings and would mean they cannot file stay back to arb.

If stay gets dismissed, they will then finally file their high court defence with possible counter claims, if it is dismissed I think they appeal it and they can have that appealed in front of a judge, Janice is not a judge. That would be another month of procedure and they might get overturned if that is the reality.

Take a look at the arb med arb protocol. Ive tried to tell you look at the process.

Deep discovery takes place after failed mediation. What happeend after failed mediation here?

High court lol

I thought it would go back to ARB the day they announced court writ feb 13th and now GST narrowed the claim to law of confidence to avoid arb issues being heard in the stay hearing, I think its nailed on for zheng zhu to get the stay.

Not sure what they do about Chong but common sense would say she gets case managements stay.

Sorry, they file their defence with potential counter claims.

The stay applications prevented them from filing defence or counter claims or that would have acknowledged the high court writ as a 'step in the proceedings' and would have invalidated the stay apps from Zheng Zhu