Court Papers6 Feb 2019 22:56
Just finished reading the court papers.
Think we need to seperate out the issue of PIs/Shareholders not having access to information from the details that tell us about the relationship between Hope/ OMF and FRR.
It's clear to me that Hope isn't living up to his fiduciary duties - in fact, making clear his predatory intentions in regards to assets/the company; tturning down the $5million loan facility offered by ZM, then offering the take control of assets and sell them.
GIven the dire situiation of the company, this evidence should slot in quite well to show that Hope was demonstrably in breach of his fiduciary duties. He was just not helping out.
However, there is more, the 24th Dec RNS,
'In the Statement of Claim, the Company states that defendant Mr Hope is in breach of his fiduciary duties as a director of FRC and these breaches include, inter alia, attempting to deprive the Company of assets for his own benefit and/or for the benefit of OMF, failing to act in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders, failing to exercise independent judgement, and unlawful interference with the business of the Company.'
Now, the last bit:
'...and unlawful interference with the business of the Company.'
While in the emails I see a clear breach of fiduciary duties, I don't see anything of the sort that would be classed as 'unlawful interference'. So they must have something else. But what?!
Does this relate to YA and YA were let off easy? [Including possibly the shorters?]?
Comms via Mole, YJ and Malcy tell me that we are from dead and that there will be reasonably positive outcome -- we will just have to wait.
Good luck all genuine holders and folks!