RE: Blue7 Jan 2023 17:11
Moniman - If we went to a qualified financial advisor and said we want him to invest in a single company they would do their best to dissuade us and if we persisted they would strongly advise against it but if we must then do it execution only as they would refuse. They would also say don't put any more than 1 or 2 percent of your portfolio into it.
The only things that are regarded as higher risk that an individual shares are things like CFD’s, Spreadbetting, unsecured mini-bonds, IPO’s. Cryptos and so on.
This is how i look at THG, i think of it at it as four phases of investing. post IPO and the risk v reward around it.
1. On or around the IPO, these investors take the biggest risk for the biggest reward. IE it goes up over 5 pounds and stays there and value increases as growth predictions set out in the prospectus come to fruition and the risk factor are not as great as set out. Fevertree would be a good recent example.
2. The SP didn’t stay long over 5 pounds but investors at stage 1 would still believe that it was going to recover, until around the capital markets day when there was around a 30% one day decline. Then the value investing starts, individuals and investing companies take another look and say this is overdone and buy some more or enter a position for the first time., or they they think the risk is too great they continue to sell or avoid the share. Jupiter UK mid cap is a good example they visited the company and then bought more at 1.29
3 The sp continues to fall and when it went below 1 pound the Bottom Feeders start to have a look, they think has the price fallen to fair value( whatever that is), and they may take a small position . I of course am a bottom feeder.
4. Finally as the SP continues to fall the bottom feeders either add more or hold, and the traders arrive and things go a bit crazy , in THG case there was forced selling driving the price down , and we have bobbed around 40-50 in the main. This was all influenced by a high profile stale bull investor that held all the way down. Librium, they slashed their target and basically the rest of them have herded around that target and here we are.
So I am a conviction bottom feeder on THG, for reasons I have posted many times but principally influenced by the actions of Lord Allen and the idea that neither beauty or Nutrition are considered to have much value by the analysts.
I dont worry about shorts , for me its all about the company proving that it is worthy investment and i see my down side as being around 39p if the worst comes to the worst. But as I say I am a conviction bottom feeder and bought more in the break between Christmas and new year.
Unfortunately 48p all holders are now Bottom feeders whether they like it or not.
GL