Member Info for Bucolic

Lord 1 Recommendation in January: " I first got drawn to FUM because I thought MED was a good idea..."
Lord 1 Recommendation yesterday: "I totally agree with your assessment that Viagra is too strong to compete against. "

As the ED landscape hasn't changed since January, what has changed Lord 1 Recommendation's mind? The only thing that has changed recently is all the Viagra patents have run out now so big pharma must be looking for something else to make money in the ED market. Why has 1 Recommendation Hawkhead stated that there is no gap in the ED market? Any evidence, 1 Recommendation Hawkhead?

Dunno. Haven't heard much from Hawkhead either since his 5p by Christmas predictions. His predictions were on a par with Lord1RecomendationTopUp's, and strangely L1PTU appeared shortly after Hawky disappeared...

Sorry, Keifer. Yes it is very quiet on ADVFN. I think Glavey has killed off free speech over there. He's probably the one giving Lord1RecommendationTopUp his 1 recommendation. Two peas from the same pod, except L"1R"TU wraps his BS in cotton wool to try and sound like he cares about FUM, and Glavey has descended into rudeness. And no, I'm not Supernumerary. In fact I've almost forgotten who I am over there!

Hi kiefer derrin from ADVFN!

It was great to see Lord"1 recommendation"TopUp predicting a drop to 8p yesterday. It cheered me up no end as he's invariably wrong. Over 9% rise today, I must start buying when he comes out with his dire predictions. Toodle pip!

Baldy, I suggest you look up what a KOL actually is.

The way I see it is this. The eminent professor has been on the FUM advisory board and is a KOL for the company. Someone like Ken James is an employee of FUM. The two things are entirely different, because a KOL is an expert in the field, and is trusted by the company and also by everyone else to be as accurate and reliable as possible, and Ken James can be expected to herald everything with a company bias. This is why Jonah is getting so worked up about it, because baldy (and others) keep repeating that Professor Ralph is an employee and by implication can't be trusted, when in actual fact he's a KOL and can be trusted.

The Italian, I think that everything ltu says SHOULD be disregarded. He only posts negative things, and whilst some may be factual, his predictions are always woeful, in fact he hasn't been correct yet. His insidious style of deramping is damaging to the BB in my opinion, and should be ignored. As for recommending his own posts, well, that says it all, really. Or perhaps LadyTopUp has her own account!

Oops, I upset you yesterday, Bruce. I thought you were joking with your women question, but I gave you a serious reply. The answer to your question today is "Why not?"

"So many opportunities to make money off this one. A shorters dream, 12p here we come." How's your short working out for you, Eatmyshort?

In my experience, Bruce, women don't get erections, and therefore can't experience erectile dysfunction.

A couple of points, baldy. You're incorrect to state that Med3000 has no active ingredients. Alcohol, for example. Allying yourself with weareallguessing is an empty gesture to try and buy yourself credibility. Unlike you, he has a position on FUM, and he also has an optimistic viewpoint, unlike your doom and gloom predictions about something you aren't even invested in. What's with your sudden interest in MED? You've already written that off and are supposedly only here to see what happens with the pain relief gel. Most of what weareallguessing posted about has already been discussed on this board, and we don't feel the need to repeat ourselves constantly. Well, most of us, anyway. We are well past the point of having an unbiased eye, as you call it.

This conversation has been had before, frankmu. At the time I said something along the lines of if they don't get Dermasys clinically tested, it'll just end up in the bargain bins at Anne Summers and Love Honey. So let's hope they don't choose that path. Incidentally, that link by TraderTimeNow is on Twitter to which I don't subscribe. (He also posted it on AVFN under the name hotandcoldstocks) Would anyone care to share what it said about FUM?

However it's dressed up, P3 was a fail. Beforehand, we were told that 19 out of 20 possible results would be a success. The result was none of that 20, it was the very basic endpoints not met - Med didn't outperform the placebo sufficiently, and yet FUM tried to wriggle out of it. Sugar pills are often used as placebo in drug trials, how ridiculous would it be if a company said they would bring the sugar pills to market as they performed as well as the drug being tested?

I think the trouble with trials like this is they are undoubtedly done in private (unless anyone knows better?) and who knows who is applying the gel? Idg69 and I had a conversation about this pre p3 results, and concluded that the results could depend on whether it's Tingting, your young Thai bride, or Elsie Tanner, your wife of 50 years, with curlers in. I know who I'd stand for, regardless of placebo or med! Perhaps LordTopUp et al who have experience in these things might help us out here?

No point trying to blind us with science, Forge. If Med was any good FUM would surely be chasing it up, but they're putting all their eggs in one basket, Dermasys. As far as I can tell, they don't have a specific patent for the version of Dermasys that they used as the placebo, as they claim on the website it is "highly customisable". They have a few patents on it, and obviously they've registered the trademark, but an actual patent for the trial version? I've researched this a bit, and it was the subject of a lot of debate a couple of years ago. In 2017 a poster on one of these board claimed that Barder had emailed him and confirmed there was no specific patent, which is surprising for their core product.
I try to ignore the science because in my experience the way an AIM company manages themselves is more important than the efficaciousness of the product., so I'm hoping they sort themselves out and get the SP up a bit so I can bale without too much of a loss. Sad but true, and sorry to sound like a deramper.

Beginning to think Jonah was right about LordTopUp and his subtle de-ramping. Funny how they all come out when the SP is dropping. If you are genuine, LTU, then the bombing share price should answer your initial question and you should steer clear.

That was a welcome last minute jump there! Hopefully it will continue tomorrow.

The FUM website states that as a loss-making company, they do not pay dividends. Their business strategy is this: "...to develop our portfolio of innovative products for two large market categories, sexual health and pain to late stage, and then partner with major pharmaceutical partners at the optimum time to generate most value." To me that suggests that Futura itself will never pay a dividend, but if you stick with whoever they partner up with (if you are given that option), you might be lucky. Some big pharma pay divis, some don't.

Slipped up there, Formul/Goldsmith! I didn't realise you were the same person, but looking back your writing style is identical, with the incessant ramping and the double exclamation marks!!